AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds recorded benchmark results for the Intel Core 3 201E, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has no individual benchmark entries or head-to-head comparison scores listed. This asymmetry limits direct numerical comparisons, but the available Intel data can still be examined for what it indicates about that processor's performance profile.

The Intel Core 3 201E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613 and a single-core score of 1780. Those figures place it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19056. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047 (a delta of 0 percent), the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039 (0.1 percent behind), the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982 (0.4 percent behind), and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979 (also 0.4 percent behind). These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Core 3 201E sits in a tightly packed performance cluster where less than half a percent separates it from several comparable processors.

Looking deeper into the Intel chip's benchmark breakdown, the Cinebench R15 multi-core result is 1271 versus 179 for single-core, while Cinebench R20 shows 5297 multi-core and 747 single-core. The PassMark suite reveals a similar pattern: multi-thread score of 14839, single-thread score of 3482, integer math at 43894, floating point math at 33260, extended instructions at 11035, data compression at 164160, data encryption at 8931, physics at 1141, random string sorting at 17783, and prime number finding at 57. The data compression result stands out as exceptionally strong relative to other PassMark metrics, suggesting the processor handles compression workloads particularly well.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE lacks recorded benchmarks in this database, no direct wins or losses can be quantified. The data simply does not yet contain head-to-head results between these two parts. What can be stated is that the Intel Core 3 201E has a verified performance footprint, while the AMD part's measured behavior remains unrecorded. That absence does not imply inferiority; it only indicates a gap in the database. Future measurements would be required to establish comparative scores, deltas, or percentiles for the AMD processor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE is built on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core 3 201E uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. That process difference alone suggests the AMD part may have an efficiency advantage, though no direct power measurements beyond TDP are available to confirm it.

The AMD chip belongs to the Gorgon Point codename family and the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which the database describes as Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. The Intel chip carries the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. The AMD part integrates 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part offers 4 cores and 8 threads. Both processors have a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, but their base clocks differ: the AMD chip runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel chip at 3.60 GHz. The higher base clock on the Intel part could translate to better sustained performance in lightly threaded workloads that do not require boosting.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201E also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is larger at 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 is 12 MB shared. The Intel chip thus offers more total cache, which can benefit workloads with repetitive memory access patterns.

Memory support shows another split. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s compared to the Intel chip's 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Both support ECC memory, which the database confirms for each. The PCIe configuration differs as well: the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). That gives the Intel part a clear advantage in raw PCIe bandwidth and lane count for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD chip uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. No benchmark scores exist for either integrated GPU in the database, so any comparison there would be speculative. The AMD socket is AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has a TDP of 35 watts, the Intel part a TDP of 60 watts. The AMD chip's lower TDP, combined with its smaller 4 nm process, points toward a power-conscious design, though actual thermal behavior would depend on system-level implementation.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and the Intel Core 3 201E have a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Their base clocks differ, with the AMD chip at 2.00 GHz and the Intel chip at 3.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE supports only DDR5.

Q: How do the two processors compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is higher than the Intel Core 3 201E's 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has a TDP of 35 watts, and the Intel Core 3 201E has a TDP of 60 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher PCIe version and lane count?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE provides PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

The recorded data shows the following differences between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and the Intel Core 3 201E:

• Cores: 6 on AMD, 4 on Intel
• Threads: 12 on AMD, 8 on Intel
• Base clock: 2.00 GHz on AMD, 3.60 GHz on Intel
• TDP: 35 watts on AMD, 60 watts on Intel
• Socket: AMD Socket AM5 on the AMD chip, Intel Socket 1700 on the Intel chip
• Codename: Gorgon Point on AMD, Bartlett Lake on Intel
• Generation: Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) on AMD, Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) on Intel
• Process node: 4 nm from TSMC on AMD, 10 nm from Intel on Intel
• Die size: 195 mm² on AMD, 163 mm² on Intel
• L2 cache per core: 1 MB on AMD, 1.25 MB on Intel
• L3 cache: 8 MB shared on AMD, 12 MB shared on Intel
• Memory support: DDR5 only on AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 on Intel
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s on AMD, 76.8 GB/s on Intel
• PCIe: Gen 4 with 12 lanes on AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes on Intel
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 840M on AMD, UHD Graphics 730 on Intel
• Release date: 2026-03-01 for AMD, 2025-01-12 for Intel
• Launch MSRP: not recorded for AMD, $134 for Intel
• Part number: 100-000001922 for AMD, SRVTR for Intel
• Average benchmark score: 0 for AMD (no data), 19056 for Intel
• Percentile vs all CPUs: 50 for AMD, 73 for Intel

The two processors share several traits as well: both have an 80 KB L1 cache per core, both use dual-channel memory buses, both support ECC memory, both are locked (multiplier unlocked is false), both are active production parts, and both are desktop market segment chips.

The Verdict

The data in the database offers a clear but incomplete picture. The Intel Core 3 201E has a verified benchmark presence with an average score of 19056 and a 73rd percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals sit within 0.4 percent of its average score, indicating that it performs in line with a known cluster of mid-range processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, so its measured performance cannot be compared. Its percentile is listed as 50, but that figure appears to be a placeholder rather than a derived ranking, since an average score of 0 accompanies it.

Given the available data, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only part with demonstrated benchmark outcomes. Anyone relying on the database's measurements would have to consider the Intel chip the known quantity. The AMD part, however, offers architectural advantages on paper: more cores and threads, a smaller 4 nm process node, lower TDP, higher memory bandwidth, and a newer release date. Those specifications suggest potential in multi-threaded workloads and power-sensitive builds, but without benchmark scores, that potential remains unverified.

The Intel chip's strengths are also visible in its specifications: a higher base clock, larger L3 cache, bigger L2 per core, dual memory type support, and PCIe Gen 5 with more lanes. For tasks that depend on single-core responsiveness or high-speed expansion devices, the Intel part has the recorded data and the spec sheet to back it up. The AMD part's advantages lean toward efficiency and parallel throughput, but the absence of measurements prevents any definitive statement about real-world wins.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 3 201E wins in every measured benchmark category because it is the only processor with scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613 and single-core score of 1780 establish a baseline. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 14839 and single-thread score of 3482 provide another layer of evidence. The data compression score of 164160 is notably strong, and the integer math score of 43894 outpaces the floating point score of 33260, suggesting compute workloads that favor integer operations will perform well.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE, lacking benchmark data, cannot be said to win any measured category. Its specification sheet, however, indicates where it might excel once measured. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with 4 nm process and 35 watt TDP positions it as a lower-power part with more parallel resources than the Intel chip. The higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s could benefit memory-intensive workloads. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics may offer different visual output capabilities than the UHD Graphics 730, though no scores support that claim.

For users prioritizing verified performance data, the Intel Core 3 201E is the safe choice. For those looking at architectural efficiency and multi-threading potential, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE presents a compelling spec sheet, but the database cannot yet confirm that potential with numbers. The Intel chip also wins on expansion capability through PCIe Gen 5 and 16 lanes, and on memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support. The AMD chip wins on power draw, process size, core count, and memory bandwidth. Until benchmark results are recorded for the AMD part, any judgment about performance parity or superiority must remain provisional.