AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

The database holds no common benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE and the Intel Core i7-14700HX. The AMD part has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rival entries, while the Intel part carries a full set of Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark scores, an average score of 45953, and four nearest rival entries. This comparison therefore separates into two parts: the Intel-only measured results and the specification differences between the two chips.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist for this pairing, so the database records zero wins for both processors. The only measured scores belong to the Intel Core i7-14700HX. In Cinebench R15, Intel scores 3812 multi-core and 296 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 13059 multi-core and 1843 single-core. In Cinebench R23, Intel scores 24595 multi-core and 2103 single-core. Geekbench results are 14390 multi-core and 2116 single-core. The PassMark results cover data compression 438539, data encryption 26092, extended instructions 25718, prime numbers 165, floating point math 93836, integer math 131296, multithread 36566, physics 2252, random string sorting 48544, and single thread 3947.

The Intel part’s average benchmark score of 45953 places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: AMD EPYC 7303 at 45960 with a delta of 0, AMD EPYC 4364P at 45970 with a delta of 0, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46030 with a delta of -0.2, and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 at 46062 with a delta of -0.2. Those entries show that the Intel chip’s average score is not an outlier; it sits effectively alongside the two EPYC parts and within 0.2% of the two higher-scoring rivals.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE, the database shows no score to compare. Its percentile of 50 and average score of 0 are the only recorded summary values, and they reflect missing benchmark entries rather than a measured performance level. The largest raw number in the Intel benchmark set is PassMark data compression at 438539, followed by integer math 131296, floating point math 93836, and random string sorting 48544. In the Cinebench suite, the multi-core scores scale from 3812 in R15 to 13059 in R20 and 24595 in R23, while the single-core scores are 296, 1843, and 2103 respectively. The AMD part has no scores to place against any of those results.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists an empty benchmark list for the AMD part, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. The Intel Core i7-14700HX has recorded scores in Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both list ECC memory support as true.

Q: Which processor has the higher clock speeds?

A: Intel has a base clock of 2.10 and a boost clock of 5.50. AMD has a base clock of 2.00 and a boost clock of 4.50.

Q: How do the process nodes and foundries differ?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. Intel uses a 10 nm process from Intel. Intel lists a die size of 257 mm²; AMD does not list a die size.

Q: Which processor is listed for desktop and which for mobile?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE is listed as Desktop with an AMD Socket AM5. The Intel Core i7-14700HX is listed as Mobile with an Intel BGA 1964 socket.

Architecture Differences

AMD’s generation field identifies the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement, codename Gorgon Point. Intel’s generation field identifies the Core i7 with Raptor Lake-HX Refresh, architecture Raptor Lake, codename Raptor Lake-HX. The AMD chip is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC; the Intel chip is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. Intel lists a 257 mm² die size, while AMD does not list one.

The cache layouts differ. Both parts use 80 KB L1 per core. AMD uses 1 MB L2 per core and 4 MB L3. Intel uses 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB shared L3. The core counts differ sharply: AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel has 20 cores and 28 threads.

The memory and I/O features also differ. AMD supports DDR5 only, with a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, but no memory bandwidth is recorded. AMD exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 10 CPU lanes; Intel exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Both processors are listed as Active, both support ECC memory, and both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two processors differ.

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE | Intel Core i7-14700HX |

|---|---|---|

| Series | None listed | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 6 | 20 |

| Threads | 12 | 28 |

| Base clock | 2.00 | 2.10 |

| Boost clock | 4.50 | 5.50 |

| TDP | 35 | 55 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Architecture | None listed | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | Not listed | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 33 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-01-07 |

| Multiplier unlocked | false | true |

| Part number | 100-000001781 | SRMXG |

| Percentile | 50 | 89 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 45953 |

The Verdict

Measured performance in this comparison belongs entirely to the Intel part. The Intel Core i7-14700HX records an average benchmark score of 45953 and an 89th percentile placement, with nearest rivals within a delta of 0 to -0.2. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark scores, so the database cannot confirm any performance level for it.

The AMD part’s specification sheet does show a smaller 4 nm process, a lower 35 TDP, a desktop AM5 socket, and a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part shows 20 cores, 28 threads, 33 MB shared L3, DDR4 and DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part also has higher base and boost clocks and a larger L2 cache per core.

For a decision based on recorded benchmark results, the Intel part is the only option with supporting data. For a decision based on power draw, process node, or desktop socket compatibility, the AMD part has specification-level advantages, but without measured scores those advantages cannot be quantified.

Where Each One Wins

AMD has no recorded benchmark wins in this pairing. Its case rests on specification fields: a 4 nm process versus Intel’s 10 nm process, a 35 TDP versus 55, a desktop AM5 socket versus Intel BGA 1964, a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus no Intel bandwidth figure, and Radeon 840M integrated graphics versus UHD Graphics 770.

Intel’s wins are all measured. In Cinebench, the Intel part records 3812 R15 multi-core, 296 R15 single-core, 13059 R20 multi-core, 1843 R20 single-core, 24595 R23 multi-core, and 2103 R23 single-core. In Geekbench, it records 14390 multi-core and 2116 single-core. In PassMark, it records 438539 data compression, 26092 data encryption, 25718 extended instructions, 165 prime numbers, 93836 floating point math, 131296 integer math, 36566 multithread, 2252 physics, 48544 random string sorting, and 3947 single thread.

For use cases tied to those tests, the Intel part is the only chip with data. The Cinebench results support rendering workloads, the Geekbench results support general processor throughput, and the PassMark results support compression, encryption, math, physics, sorting, and single-threaded tasks. For use cases tied to power draw, process node, or desktop socket compatibility, the AMD part has the specification edge, but no benchmark score is recorded to support a performance-based use case split.