AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is asymmetrical. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14400T has a full suite of recorded scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests. This means the head-to-head analysis is based entirely on the Intel processor's measured performance and its position relative to other CPUs in the database, since there are no direct comparison scores for the AMD part.

The Intel Core i5-14400T delivers strong multi-threaded results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 places it well above the 10,000-point range typically associated with mainstream desktop processors. The single-core score of 2,426 in the same test confirms that the processor is not just a multi-thread workhorse but also carries solid single-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 7,219 and single-core score of 1,018 follow the same pattern, showing consistency across benchmark generations. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 1,732 and a single-core score of 244, which aligns with the expected scaling from the newer test versions.

Passmark results reinforce the Intel processor's capabilities. The multi-thread score of 20,223 indicates robust parallel processing, while the single-thread score of 3,512 shows that lightly threaded workloads are handled with ease. Integer math completes at 65,667, and floating point math at 49,139, both strong figures for a 35-watt part. Data compression scores 235,636, which is a substantial result for everyday file handling and archiving tasks. Data encryption reaches 13,244, and extended instructions score 14,562, indicating good performance in cryptography and SIMD workloads. The processor finds prime numbers at a rate of 73, and physics calculations score 1,244. Random string sorting, a test that stresses memory and cache behavior, scores 25,181.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark scores in the database, the Intel Core i5-14400T records zero head-to-head losses and holds the only measurable wins. The database shows no direct comparison scores between the two processors, so the analysis relies on the Intel part's absolute scores and its percentile ranking.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14400T's benchmark score in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T scores 17,189 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core score of 2,426 in the same test.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400T compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27,166. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K (27,097), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (27,051), 0.7% behind the Intel Core i7-13700H (27,355), and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G (27,382).

Q: What percentile does the Intel Core i5-14400T achieve among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T ranks in the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark entries in the database, so its average benchmark score is 0 and its percentile ranking is 50.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE's position relative to all CPUs if it has no scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database, though this is based on no recorded benchmark data.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14400T's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has a launch MSRP of $221.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture for one side and a data gap for the other. The Intel Core i5-14400T has comprehensive benchmark coverage and a 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 27,166 places it in the company of the Intel Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, with margins of only 0.3% and 0.4% respectively. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark scores in the database, so its performance cannot be measured against the Intel part.

For users who rely on recorded data to make decisions, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance numbers. It delivers a balanced combination of multi-threaded throughput (20,223 in Passmark multi-thread) and single-thread speed (3,512 in Passmark single-thread). The Intel part also offers a larger shared L3 cache of 20 MB and a die size of 215 mm², with a 10-process node from Intel's own foundry.

The AMD processor brings its own specification advantages that can be stated from the recorded data. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, a newer manufacturing node. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. Its integrated graphics is the Radeon 840M, compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 730. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how these specifications translate into real-world performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both have the same boost clock of 4.50 GHz, but the base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 1.50 GHz. Both are rated at 35 watts TDP.

Memory support differs significantly. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database lists no bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 10 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The sockets are different as well: AMD uses Socket AM5, and Intel uses Socket 1700.

Both processors have an integrated GPU, but they are different models: the AMD part uses the Radeon 840M, and the Intel part uses the UHD Graphics 730. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE is built on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which uses a hybrid of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. The part number is 100-000001781, and it was released on 2026-03-01.

The Intel Core i5-14400T belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 215 mm². The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 20 MB shared L3 cache. The part number is SRN3N, and it was released on 2024-01-07.

The architectural differences are substantial. The AMD part uses a newer 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The Intel part has a significantly larger L3 cache (20 MB shared versus 4 MB), but the AMD part has a more modern process node. The Intel part also uses a hybrid core design within the Raptor Lake architecture, though the database does not specify the exact P-core and E-core configuration.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only processor with recorded scores. Its multi-threaded performance is strong across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, as well as Passmark multi-thread. Its single-thread performance is also competitive, with scores of 3,512 in Passmark and 2,426 in Cinebench R23. For workloads involving integer math, floating point math, data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, physics calculations, and random string sorting, the Intel part has verified results showing solid throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE cannot be assigned wins in any benchmark category because the database contains no scores for it. However, the recorded specifications suggest areas where it may offer advantages in principle. Its 4 nm TSMC process is a newer manufacturing node than Intel's 10 nm process, which may indicate better power efficiency. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with DDR5 support is explicitly recorded, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure. Its Radeon 840M integrated graphics may provide different graphics capabilities than the Intel UHD Graphics 730, though no graphics benchmarks are available. The AMD part also has a higher base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, though both boost to 4.50 GHz.

For use cases that depend on measured performance, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only option with data support. For use cases that rely on architectural specifications, the AMD part offers a newer process node, a different memory configuration, and a different integrated GPU, but these advantages cannot be quantified from the database. The 50th percentile ranking for the AMD part versus the 79th percentile for the Intel part reflects the data availability gap rather than a direct performance comparison.