AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14600T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.8 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,262
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
319
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,427
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,330
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
22,447
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,169
geekbench_multicore
N/A
12,840
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,559
passmark_data_compression
N/A
301,827
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
18,226
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
16,985
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
121
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
64,726
passmark_integer_math
N/A
95,112
passmark_multithread
N/A
26,409
passmark_physics
N/A
1,873
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
34,310
passmark_single_thread
N/A
3,744
passmark_singlethread
N/A
3,744

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs Intel Core i5-14600T

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE versus the Intel Core i5-14600T. However, the Intel Core i5-14600T has a substantial set of recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE currently has no benchmark scores listed in the database. This asymmetry shapes the analysis: every quantitative comparison must rely on the Intel processor's measured results and the architectural data provided for both parts.

Focusing on the Intel Core i5-14600T's recorded scores, the data shows a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 22,447 points in multi-core and 3,169 points in single-core. The ratio between these two figures, roughly 7.1 to 1, indicates excellent scaling across its 14 cores and 20 threads. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 9,427, while single-core reaches 1,330. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 2,262 multi-core and 319 single-core. These three Cinebench generations consistently show the same pattern: the processor maintains a high multi-core advantage over its own single-core result.

Geekbench measurements align with this picture. The multi-core score is 12,840, and the single-core score is 2,559. The multi-core result is roughly five times the single-core result, which reflects the thread count available. PassMark tests add further granularity. The multi-thread score is 26,409, while single-thread is 3,744. The integer math test delivers 95,112, floating point math scores 64,726, and extended instructions reach 16,985. Data compression scores 301,827, data encryption scores 18,226, and random string sorting reaches 34,310. Physics simulation scores 1,873, and finding prime numbers scores 121.

The Intel part's overall average benchmark score is 32,707. This places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the recorded data are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697, a delta of 0 percent; the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750, a delta of -0.1 percent; the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662, a delta of 0.1 percent; and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, a delta of -0.3 percent. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Core i5-14600T sits in a very competitive band of mid-range desktop and mobile processors. It is neither ahead nor behind any of these rivals by a meaningful margin in the aggregate score.

Since the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark scores, no exact wins can be assigned to either processor in a head-to-head sense. The data available for the Intel part shows a mature, well-tested chip with consistent results across multiple benchmark suites. The AMD part's absence from the benchmark tables means the database cannot yet confirm its performance level.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE, and its average benchmark score is 0. The Intel Core i5-14600T, by contrast, has 19 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14600T's best multi-core score in the database?

A: The highest multi-core score recorded is 22,447 in Cinebench R23. The next highest multi-core results are 9,427 in Cinebench R20 and 2,262 in Cinebench R15.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600T compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: Its average score of 32,707 is nearly identical to four close competitors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is at 32,697 (0 percent delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is at 32,750 (-0.1 percent), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is at 32,662 (0.1 percent), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is at 32,812 (-0.3 percent).

Q: What is the process node difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE and the Intel Core i5-14600T list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has a release date of 2026-03-01. The Intel Core i5-14600T has a release date of 2024-01-07.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design families. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, built on a hybrid of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and is part of the Core i5 generation.

The process technology differs sharply. AMD's chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Intel's chip uses a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. This difference in node size typically affects power efficiency and transistor density, though the database does not provide transistor counts for either part.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core and provides a much larger 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part also has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the AMD part has no die size listed.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory access and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with dual-channel access, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 10 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics are present on both. The AMD part uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include benchmark scores for either integrated GPU.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are a primary differentiator. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads. This gives Intel a 2.33 to 1 advantage in cores and a 1.67 to 1 advantage in threads.

Clock speeds favor Intel in the boost state. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Intel's boost advantage of 0.60 GHz is significant for single-threaded workloads.

Both processors share a 35 W TDP, so power draw is equal in the database.

The sockets are incompatible. AMD uses Socket AM5, while Intel uses Socket 1700. Neither multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is not officially supported for either part.

Memory bandwidth is listed for AMD only at 89.6 GB/s. Intel's memory bandwidth field is null. ECC memory support is true for both. Memory type support differs: AMD is DDR5 only, Intel is DDR4 and DDR5.

PCIe generation and lane count differ: AMD is Gen 4 with 10 lanes, Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel part at $255. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed.

The production status is Active for both. The AMD part has a later release date (2026-03-01) compared to Intel (2024-01-07).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600T wins in every measured benchmark category, simply because it has measurements. Its 14 cores and 20 threads deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447, which is a strong result for a 35 W part. The single-core score of 3,169 in the same test shows that the 5.10 GHz boost clock is effective. For workloads that scale with thread count, such as rendering, video encoding, or scientific computing, the Intel chip's core advantage is the dominant factor.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE wins in architectural efficiency metrics. Its 4 nm TSMC process is two generations ahead of Intel's 10 nm node in the database. The smaller node typically implies lower power per transistor, though the database does not provide power efficiency measurements. AMD's memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s is recorded, while Intel's is absent, suggesting AMD has a defined memory throughput specification.

In the nearest-rival comparison, the Intel part's average score of 32,707 places it in a dead heat with four other processors. This indicates that the Core i5-14600T is not a standout in its class; it is one of several comparable mid-range options. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, a sibling in the Ryzen AI PRO family, scores 32,662, which is 0.1 percent higher than the Intel part. This suggests that AMD's newer architecture is competitive at similar performance levels, even with fewer cores and threads.

For users with existing Intel Socket 1700 motherboards, the Core i5-14600T offers a drop-in path with DDR4 or DDR5 memory support. For users with AMD Socket AM5 boards, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE provides a newer platform but with fewer cores.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-14600T in terms of measured performance. It has 19 benchmark results, an average score of 32,707, and an 83rd percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking, which is the neutral default for unmeasured parts. Any user choosing between these two based purely on database evidence would select the Intel part, because performance data exists for it and confirms strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results.

However, the architectural data offers reasons to consider the AMD part. It uses a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm), a newer core design (Zen 5 / Zen 5c versus Raptor Lake), and a higher memory bandwidth specification (89.6 GB/s versus null). The AMD chip also has a later release date, which means it represents a more recent design generation.

The Intel part wins on core count, thread count, boost clock, L2 cache per core, L3 cache total, PCIe generation, and launch MSRP availability. The AMD part wins on process node, memory bandwidth specification, and platform generation recency.

The verdict depends on what the data can support. For confirmed performance, the Intel Core i5-14600T is the only option with evidence. For architectural modernity, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has the advantage. The database cannot yet confirm whether the AMD chip's newer design translates into competitive benchmark scores. Until benchmarks are recorded for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE, the measured performance edge remains entirely with the Intel part.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 PRO 435GE
i5-14600T
Core Specs
Cores
6
14 +133.3%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.8 -10.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.1 +13.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.8 -10.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.1 +13.3%
Multiplier
20
18 -10.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
35 0.0%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
92 W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
—
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 10 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$255
Part Number
100-000001781
SRN46
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
None
View Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE Details View Core i5-14600T Details