AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE, while the Intel Core i5-14400 has a full suite of recorded results. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison. The Intel part shows an average benchmark score of 32,115, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD processor sits at the 50th percentile, though with no averaged score recorded, that percentile likely reflects its position in a broader field rather than measured performance data.

Looking at the Intel part alone gives a sense of what the AMD chip is up against. In Cinebench R23, the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 21,315 in multi-core and 3,009 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the figures are 8,952 multi-core and 1,263 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 2,148 multi-core and 303 single-core. These are strong results for a desktop processor in its class.

Geekbench results for the Intel chip show 9,807 multi-core and 1,905 single-core. PassMark tests add further detail: multi-thread score of 25,080, single-thread score of 3,741, integer math at 82,017, floating point math at 61,549, data encryption at 16,731, data compression at 314,995, extended instructions at 19,816, physics at 1,396, random string sorting at 32,346, and prime number finding at 80.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means there are no direct head-to-head wins for either side to quantify. The wins column shows zero for both processors. What the data does reveal is the shape of the contest: a 6-core, 12-thread AMD part with a 35 watt TDP against a 10-core, 16-thread Intel part with a 65 watt TDP. The Intel chip has more cores, more threads, a higher base clock (2.50 GHz versus 2.00 GHz), and a higher boost clock (4.70 GHz versus 4.50 GHz).

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14400 provide context. The Intel Core i7-12800H averages 32,121, essentially identical with a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i7-13705H scores 32,076, a 0.1 percent delta. The Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 32,040, a 0.2 percent delta. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32,226, a negative 0.3 percent delta. These comparisons show the i5-14400 sits in a tightly packed band of mobile and desktop parts, all within a fraction of a percent of each other.

Where Each One Wins

Without AMD benchmark numbers, the wins must be inferred from specifications rather than measured results. The Intel Core i5-14400 wins on core count, offering 10 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads. It also wins on clock speeds, with both base and boost clocks higher than the AMD part. The Intel chip has a larger L3 cache, 20 MB shared versus 4 MB for AMD. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE wins on power efficiency. Its 35 watt TDP is nearly half the Intel part's 65 watt TDP. The AMD chip also uses a more advanced 4 nm process node, which typically indicates newer manufacturing technology. AMD supports DDR5 memory exclusively, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a Radeon 840M integrated GPU, while Intel has UHD Graphics 730.

The memory bandwidth figure for AMD is listed at 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's is not recorded. Both support ECC memory. Both support dual-channel memory. The AMD part uses Gen 4 PCIe with 10 lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes, giving Intel a substantial advantage in PCIe bandwidth and lane count.

In terms of release timing, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has a release date of March 2026, while the Intel Core i5-14400 was released in January 2024. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part has no MSRP recorded.

The percentile rankings tell a story: Intel at 82 percent of all CPUs, AMD at 50 percent. That is a wide gap, though it must be read with the caveat that the AMD percentile is not backed by an averaged benchmark score in the same way the Intel figure is.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14400 uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with a Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation label.

The process nodes differ significantly. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. The die size for Intel is recorded at 215 mm². No die size is listed for AMD.

Cache hierarchies diverge sharply. Both parts use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is where the gap widens: AMD has 4 MB total, while Intel has 20 MB shared. That is a fivefold difference in L3 capacity, which typically impacts workloads with large working sets that benefit from on-die caching.

Memory support differs in flexibility. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders a choice of memory generation. AMD supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's is not listed in the database.

PCIe capabilities favor Intel. The Intel Core i5-14400 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 10 lanes. This affects expansion options and data transfer speeds for GPUs and storage devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Both are integrated solutions, but they belong to different GPU architectures and likely different performance tiers.

The Intel part has a locked multiplier, meaning it cannot be overclocked through multiplier adjustment. The AMD part also has a locked multiplier. Neither processor offers unlocked overclocking in the traditional sense.

The AMD part's socket is AMD Socket AM5, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. These are not interchangeable platforms, so the choice of processor dictates the motherboard and broader platform ecosystem.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Core i5-14400 has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE supports DDR5 only.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE uses Radeon 840M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14400 uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the L3 cache difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14400 has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 boosts to 4.70 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE and the Intel Core i5-14400 support ECC memory.

Q: What are the PCIe capabilities?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE uses Gen 4 with 10 lanes. The Intel Core i5-14400 uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE | Intel Core i5-14400 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release Date | March 2026 | January 2024 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part Number | 100-000001781 | SRN3QSRN46 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 82 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 32,115 |

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split based on priorities. The Intel Core i5-14400 is the measured performer. Its benchmark results are fully recorded, showing strong multi-core and single-core scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark suites. Its 82nd percentile ranking, backed by an average score of 32,115, places it in the upper tier of the database. It also offers more cores, more threads, higher clocks, a larger L3 cache, broader memory support, and faster PCIe connectivity. For workloads that stress multi-threaded performance, content creation, or heavy computation, the Intel part has the recorded evidence to support a pick.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark scores in the database. Its case rests entirely on specifications. The 35 watt TDP makes it the efficiency choice, consuming roughly half the power of the Intel part. The 4 nm TSMC process node indicates a newer manufacturing technology than Intel's 10 nm process. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics may offer different capabilities than Intel's UHD Graphics 730, though no benchmark data confirms this. The AMD part also arrives later, with a release date in March 2026 versus January 2024 for Intel.

The percentile gap, 82 versus 50, suggests the Intel part occupies a higher position in the overall CPU landscape. The nearest rival comparisons for the Intel chip show it trading places with a group of processors all scoring within 0.3 percent of each other, indicating the i5-14400 is well positioned among its peers. The AMD part has no such comparison data.

For users who prioritize measured performance and a proven track record, the Intel Core i5-14400 is the data-backed choice. For users who prioritize low power consumption and a newer manufacturing process, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has the specification advantage. The database does not provide enough information to declare a definitive winner beyond these parameters. The choice depends on whether the workload favors raw throughput or efficiency.