AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided. The Intel Core 3 304 has benchmark scores available in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no recorded benchmark entries. This means all quantitative comparisons come from the Intel chip's measured results, and the AMD chip's performance can only be assessed through its architectural specifications.

The Intel Core 3 304 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5263 points and a single-core score of 1765 points. In Cinebench R20, it records 4160 multi-core and 587 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 849 multi-core and 264 single-core. These scores place the chip at the 68th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 13745.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Intel Core 3 304's standing. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 13786, which is 0.3% higher than the Core 3 304. The Intel Core i7-8750H scores 13868, 0.9% higher. The AMD EPYC 7443 scores 13936, 1.4% higher. Only the Intel Core 5 120UL scores lower, at 13594, which is 1.1% below the Core 3 304. The Core 3 304 sits in a tight cluster where the spread among all four nearest rivals is just 2.5 percentage points.

PassMark tests show the Intel Core 3 304's specific strengths. The multi-thread score is 11625, while single-thread is 3614. Integer math scores 24640, floating-point math scores 29722, and extended instructions score 9686. Data compression scores 114775, data encryption scores 8501, and random string sorting scores 13659. Physics scores 868, and find prime numbers scores 68.

The AMD chip's absence from benchmark results means no head-to-head deltas can be computed. The database records zero wins for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE and zero wins for the Intel Core 3 304 in direct comparisons. The available performance data belongs entirely to the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing processes and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core 3 304 uses a 3 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The AMD chip belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on the Gorgon Point codename with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid core arrangement. The Intel chip belongs to the Core 3 generation with the Wildcat Lake codename.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading support. The Intel processor has 5 cores and 5 threads, meaning no hyper-threading on any core. This gives the AMD part a 2.4x thread advantage on paper, which typically translates to stronger multi-threaded workloads when all threads are utilized.

Clock speeds favor the AMD chip. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 4.50 GHz boost clock. The Intel Core 3 304 has a 1.50 GHz base clock and a 4.30 GHz boost clock. The AMD part boosts 0.20 GHz higher and runs its base clock 0.50 GHz higher.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD chip uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip uses 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has more total L3 cache, but the AMD part benefits from per-core L2 allocation that scales with core count.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The AMD chip supports DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory support. The Intel chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X through a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth and no ECC support. The AMD part offers 50% more memory bandwidth on paper.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 10 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The AMD part has more expansion headroom.

Integrated graphics differ by vendor. The AMD chip uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. No graphics benchmark data exists for either chip in the database.

Power envelopes are remarkably different. The AMD chip has a 35 W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 15 W TDP. The Intel part draws less than half the power budget of the AMD part.

Socket compatibility separates the two completely. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, a desktop platform. The Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1516, a ball-grid-array mobile package. The AMD chip targets the desktop market segment, while the Intel chip targets mobile.

Release timing is close. The AMD chip has a release date of 2026-03-01, and the Intel chip follows on 2026-04-15. Both are active production parts. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $309. The AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads. The AMD chip offers 7 more threads than the Intel chip.

Q: What is the performance standing of the Intel Core 3 304 in the database?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, scores 13786, which is 0.3% higher.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE boosts to 4.50 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the Intel Core 3 304's 4.30 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 3 304 does not.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each chip provide?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE provides 89.6 GB/s through a dual-channel DDR5 bus. The Intel Core 3 304 provides 59.7 GB/s through a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has a 35 W TDP. The Intel Core 3 304 has a 15 W TDP, which is 20 W lower.

Q: Which chip has a higher L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, which is 2 MB less.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between these two processors based on use case. The Intel Core 3 304 has verified benchmark results, a 68th percentile standing, and a much lower 15 W TDP. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE has no benchmark data, so its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database. The Intel chip's nearest rivals cluster within 1.4% of its average score, showing a competitive market position among mid-range processors.

The AMD chip offers structural advantages on paper: more cores, more threads, higher clocks, dual-channel memory, ECC support, and more PCIe lanes. The Intel chip offers the only measured performance numbers and dramatically lower power consumption.

The Intel chip also carries a launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch price. The Intel part is a mobile processor on BGA 1516, while the AMD part is a desktop processor on AM5. These are not interchangeable products. The socket difference alone dictates different system designs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE | Intel Core 3 304 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 5 |

| Threads | 12 | 5 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Wildcat Lake |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2026-03-01 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $309 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 304 wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5263, single-core score of 1765, and PassMark multi-thread score of 11625 are the only performance figures available for comparison. The chip's 15 W TDP makes it suited for power-constrained mobile designs. Its 68th percentile ranking and average score of 13745 place it slightly below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Intel Core i7-8750H, but slightly above the Intel Core 5 120UL. The compact BGA 1516 socket and mobile market segment indicate a low-power laptop or compact system role.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE wins on architectural specification advantages. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.50 GHz boost clock provides a theoretical multi-threading advantage over the Intel chip's 5-core, 5-thread layout. The dual-channel memory bus delivering 89.6 GB/s more than doubles the Intel chip's bandwidth figure, which matters for memory-intensive workloads. ECC memory support suits reliability-focused desktop builds. The AM5 socket targets the desktop segment, and the 35 W TDP allows higher sustained performance than the 15 W Intel part. The 4 nm TSMC process and 10 PCIe Gen 4 lanes offer additional headroom for expansion.

The database shows no benchmark overlap between the two processors. The Intel chip's measured scores cannot be compared directly to the AMD chip's unmeasured performance. The choice between the two hinges on platform requirements: desktop systems with AM5 and ECC support point to the AMD chip, while mobile systems with minimal power draw point to the Intel chip. The Intel chip's $309 launch MSRP is the only pricing data available, and no cost comparison can be drawn for the AMD part.