AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G and the Intel Core i5-14400 are both 65W desktop processors aimed at mainstream systems, but the data reveals two very different design philosophies. The AMD part, built on a 4 nm process with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid layout, delivers a narrow single-thread win, while the Intel chip, a 10 nm Raptor Lake Refresh part with more cores and a larger cache, dominates multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads. Across the head-to-head benchmark set, the Intel Core i5-14400 wins 9 of 11 tests, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G taking the remaining 2.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G records an average benchmark score of 40718, while the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115. The AMD part also sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the Intel part's 82nd percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G wins the single-thread test with a score of 3829, which is 2.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-14400's score of 3741. This is the only head-to-head category where AMD takes the lead.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest delta is in the passmark_find_prime_numbers test, where the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 80 versus the AMD's 55, a 31.2% advantage for Intel.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G and the Intel Core i5-14400 have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What are the socket requirements for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core i5-14400 uses Intel Socket 1700. They are not interchangeable.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G's boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, using the Gorgon Point codename and the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation architecture (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). It offers 6 cores and 12 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. The memory interface is dual-channel DDR5 with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 10 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 840M.

The Intel Core i5-14400 belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, and is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It provides 10 cores and 16 threads, with a die size of 215 mm². Its cache configuration is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel setup, though no bandwidth figure is recorded. The Intel part offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and uses the UHD Graphics 730 for integrated graphics.

Key architectural differences include the process node (4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel), the core and thread counts (6/12 versus 10/16), the L3 cache size (4 MB versus 20 MB), and the PCIe generation and lane counts (Gen 4 with 10 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes). The AMD chip also carries a higher memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip supports older DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14400 is the stronger choice for multi-threaded and compute-heavy tasks. It leads in every head-to-head test except single-thread performance, with substantial margins in integer math (22.3% ahead), floating-point math (29.3% ahead), and multithread workloads (19.1% ahead). Its higher core count (10 versus 6), larger L3 cache (20 MB versus 4 MB), and higher boost clock (4.70 GHz versus 4.50 GHz) all contribute to these results.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G, however, wins the single-thread test by 2.4%, and it achieves a higher average benchmark score (40718 versus 32115) alongside a better percentile ranking (87th versus 82nd). For users prioritizing the average score and peak single-thread performance, the AMD part holds an advantage. However, the Intel part is the clear leader in raw throughput across the majority of measured workloads, making it the better fit for applications that leverage many cores and a large cache.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two CPUs:

• Cores: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has 6 cores; Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores.
• Threads: AMD has 12 threads; Intel has 16 threads.
• Base Clock: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz; Intel runs at 2.50 GHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD boosts to 4.50 GHz; Intel boosts to 4.70 GHz.
• Process Node: AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC; Intel uses a 10 nm process from Intel.
• Die Size: Intel has a die size of 215 mm²; AMD does not have a recorded die size.
• L2 Cache: AMD has 1 MB per core; Intel has 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: AMD has 4 MB total; Intel has 20 MB shared.
• Memory Support: AMD supports DDR5 only; Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory Bandwidth: AMD records 89.6 GB/s; Intel has no recorded bandwidth figure.
• PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 10 CPU lanes; Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: AMD uses Radeon 840M; Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.
• Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket AM5; Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Release Date: AMD released on 2026-03-01; Intel released on 2024-01-07.
• Part Number: AMD is 100-000001783; Intel is SRN3QSRN46.
• Launch MSRP: Intel has a launch MSRP of $221; AMD has no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14400 dominates the benchmark suite, winning 9 of 11 tests. Its biggest victory comes in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where it scores 80 versus AMD's 55, a 31.2% lead. Floating-point math also shows a clear gap, with Intel scoring 61549 against AMD's 43494, a 29.3% advantage. Integer math follows a similar pattern: Intel scores 82017, AMD scores 63707, a 22.3% difference.

Data encryption and physics tests also favor Intel decisively. The Intel part scores 16731 in encryption, 27.6% higher than AMD's 12111. In physics, Intel scores 1396 versus AMD's 999, a 28.4% margin. Data compression shows Intel at 314995 against AMD's 253484, a 19.5% gap, while multithread performance has Intel at 25080 versus AMD's 20285, a 19.1% difference. Random string sorting goes to Intel with 32346 versus 27407, a 15.3% lead, and extended instructions favor Intel at 19816 versus 18697, a 5.6% margin.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G claims both single-thread tests with identical scores of 3829, beating Intel's 3741 by 2.4%. These are the only wins for AMD in the head-to-head data. The results confirm that Intel's higher core count, larger L3 cache, and higher clocks deliver broad multi-thread superiority, while AMD's newer process and architecture provide a small but measurable single-thread edge.