AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G and the Intel Core 7 150U occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded benchmark data reflects that split clearly. The AMD part, a desktop-class chip on the AM5 socket, wins 9 of 11 head-to-head tests, while the Intel mobile processor takes only 2. The decisive factor is not core count, where Intel actually leads with 10 cores against AMD's 6, but rather the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture and the higher power envelope. The data suggests these are not direct competitors in the same chassis, but rather alternatives for different system designs, with the AMD chip dominating compute-heavy workloads and the Intel chip showing narrow wins in a couple of specific tests.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is the clear winner for most productivity and content-creation tasks. Its victories span data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, floating point math, integer math, multithreaded performance, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. The largest deltas come in extended instructions, where AMD scores 18697 against Intel's 8748, a 113.7% advantage, and data compression, where AMD's 253484 outpaces Intel's 158622 by 59.8%. These are not marginal differences; they represent workloads where the AMD chip finishes substantially ahead. For users running compression tools, encryption software, or code that leverages SIMD extensions, the AMD part is the obvious choice.

The Intel Core 7 150U wins only two tests: find prime numbers and physics. In find prime numbers, Intel scores 58 versus AMD's 55, a 5.2% edge, and in physics, Intel scores 1012 against AMD's 999, a 1.3% margin. These are narrow wins, and the physics test is essentially a tie. The Intel chip's advantage here is small enough that it does not suggest a general pattern, but it does indicate that in certain integer-heavy loops and basic physics simulations, the Intel architecture can edge ahead. The overall picture, however, is that the AMD processor wins the vast majority of workloads, and the Intel chip's victories are isolated to niche scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G uses the Gorgon Point codename and the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150U, by contrast, uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-U, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is significant: the AMD chip uses a denser, more advanced manufacturing process, which likely contributes to its higher performance per watt and its ability to sustain higher clocks within its power budget.

The core configurations differ in an important way. AMD uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel uses 10 cores and 12 threads. This means Intel has more physical cores, but the thread count is identical, suggesting the Intel chip relies on a mix of performance and efficiency cores to reach that count. The AMD chip's 6 cores are all derived from the Zen 5 design, which is a newer microarchitecture than Intel's Raptor Lake cores. The cache hierarchy also differs: AMD provides 1 MB of L2 cache per core and only 4 MB of L3 cache, while Intel provides 1.25 MB of L2 per core and a much larger 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Despite Intel's larger L3, AMD still wins most memory-sensitive tests, which points to the Zen 5 core being more efficient at extracting performance from limited cache.

The power envelopes are starkly different. The AMD chip has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 15 watts. This is a 4.3x difference in thermal design power, and it explains why the AMD chip can sustain higher performance in multithreaded workloads. The Intel chip is designed for mobile systems with limited cooling, while the AMD chip is a desktop part that assumes a capable air cooler or liquid solution. The memory support also differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. This gives Intel more flexibility in system design, but it does not translate into a performance advantage in the recorded benchmarks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data reveals the scale of AMD's dominance. In data compression, AMD scores 253484 against Intel's 158622, a 59.8% lead. In data encryption, AMD scores 12111 against 10025, a 20.8% lead. The extended instructions test is the most lopsided: AMD scores 18697, Intel scores 8748, giving AMD a 113.7% advantage. This suggests AMD's implementation of AVX-512 or similar instruction sets is far more efficient than Intel's, likely because the Zen 5 core can handle these workloads without significant throttling.

In floating point math, AMD scores 43494 against Intel's 34405, a 26.4% lead. In integer math, AMD scores 63707 against 51057, a 24.8% lead. The multithreaded test shows AMD at 20285 versus Intel's 14700, a 38% advantage, which is consistent with the TDP difference and the newer core design. Random string sorting goes to AMD at 27407 versus 18269, a 50% lead. Single-thread performance is closer: AMD scores 3829 against Intel's 3508, a 9.2% edge. This shows that even in lightly threaded tasks, the Zen 5 core is faster, though not by the same margin as in heavily threaded or vectorized workloads.

The two Intel wins are narrow. In find prime numbers, Intel scores 58 against AMD's 55, a 5.2% edge. In physics, Intel scores 1012 against AMD's 999, a 1.3% margin. The physics result is within noise, but the prime number test is a pure integer loop where Intel's higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 4.50 GHz likely plays a role. The Intel chip has a 0.90 GHz higher peak clock, which can help in short, single-threaded bursts. However, the AMD chip still wins the general single-thread test by 9.2%, suggesting its instructions-per-clock advantage outweighs the clock deficit.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has 6 cores. Both have 12 threads.

Q: Does the larger L3 cache on Intel help in real workloads?

A: The Intel chip has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD has only 4 MB. Despite this 3x difference, AMD wins 9 of 11 benchmarks, including memory-sensitive tests like data compression and random string sorting. The larger cache does not translate into a performance advantage in the recorded data.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD chip has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 15 watts. This 50-watt difference explains why AMD sustains higher multithreaded performance, though it also means Intel is better suited for thin laptops.

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded tasks?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G scores 3829 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Intel Core 7 150U scores 3508. AMD leads by 9.2%, despite Intel having a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.50 GHz.

Q: Are there any workloads where Intel wins?

A: Yes, Intel wins two tests: find prime numbers (58 vs 55, a 5.2% edge) and physics (1012 vs 999, a 1.3% edge). These are narrow victories in specific integer and simulation workloads.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: The AMD chip is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel chip is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD process is more advanced, which likely contributes to its higher performance per watt.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for users who prioritize raw compute performance: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G. It wins 9 of 11 benchmarks, often by substantial margins, and its 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it far above Intel's 71st percentile. The AMD chip's average benchmark score of 40718 dwarfs Intel's 17395, a 2.3x difference. For desktop users running compression, encryption, math, or multithreaded applications, the AMD part is the superior option.

The Intel Core 7 150U is not without merit, but its wins are limited to two tests with margins under 6%. Its 15-watt TDP makes it a sensible choice for mobile systems where battery life and cooling are priorities, and its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers system design flexibility. However, the benchmark results do not show any scenario where Intel's performance is compelling enough to recommend it over AMD for compute-heavy work. The Intel chip is a capable mobile processor, but the AMD chip is a faster desktop processor, and the recorded data reflects that hierarchy.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150U uses 10 cores and 12 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 4.50 GHz, while Intel runs at 1.80 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost. The AMD TDP is 65 watts versus Intel's 15 watts. The AMD chip uses the AM5 socket, while Intel uses BGA 1744. AMD is built on a 4 nm TSMC process, Intel on a 10 nm Intel process. AMD's cache includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 4 MB L3, while Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD has 10 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, Intel has 8. AMD's integrated graphics is the Radeon 840M, Intel's is Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. AMD supports ECC memory, Intel does not. AMD is a desktop part, Intel is mobile. The AMD chip was released on 2026-03-01, Intel on 2024-01-07.