AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G vs Intel Core 5 330 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear split between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G and the Intel Core 5 330, with each processor winning distinct categories. The AMD part takes 6 of the 11 recorded tests, while Intel wins 5, but the margins tell a more nuanced story than the win count alone.

AMD's largest victory comes in passmark_integer_math, where it scores 63707 against Intel's 33258, a 91.6% advantage. This is by far the biggest delta in the entire comparison. The AMD processor also dominates passmark_data_compression with a score of 253484 versus 145287, a 74.5% lead. In passmark_random_string_sorting, AMD extends its edge to 54.2%, scoring 27407 against Intel's 17771. The passmark_extended_instructions test shows AMD ahead by 46%, with scores of 18697 and 12808 respectively. AMD's passmark_multithread score of 20285 beats Intel's 15471 by 31.1%, and in passmark_data_encryption, AMD leads 12111 to 11076, a 9.3% margin.

Intel counters with a decisive win in passmark_find_prime_numbers, scoring 114 against AMD's 55, a 51.8% edge for Intel. The passmark_physics test also favors Intel, 1201 to 999, a 16.8% advantage. In passmark_single_thread, Intel scores 4088 versus AMD's 3829, a 6.3% lead, and the duplicate singlethread record confirms the same result. The closest contest is passmark_floating_point_math, where Intel edges AMD 43885 to 43494, just 0.9% apart.

The overall average benchmark scores reflect these different strengths. AMD's avgBenchmarkScore of 40718 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while Intel's avgBenchmarkScore of 18345 lands in the 72nd percentile. AMD's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core 5 223PE at 40585 (0.3% behind), the Intel Core 7 253PE at 40557 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40518 (0.5% behind). Intel's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core 7 360 at 18374 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 (0.2% behind).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD's Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. Intel's Core 5 330 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation built on the Wildcat Lake architecture.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. AMD uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while Intel uses a 3 nm node from its own foundry. Both processors have 6 physical cores, but AMD supports 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while Intel has 6 threads, meaning no hyperthreading on the Intel part.

Cache layouts diverge sharply. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. This means AMD's per-core L2 is larger, while Intel's shared L3 is larger overall.

Memory support shows another major split. AMD supports DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, plus ECC memory support. Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with single-channel memory and a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, without ECC. The AMD part offers 10 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD pairs the processor with Radeon 840M graphics, while Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD processor targets the desktop market segment with an AMD Socket AM5, while Intel targets mobile with an Intel BGA 1516 socket. The TDP ratings reflect this: AMD is rated at 65 watts, while Intel is rated at 15 watts. Both have locked multipliers.

Release dates place AMD first at March 2026 and Intel at April 2026. Both are listed as active production parts. AMD's part number is 100-000001783, while Intel's is SAE3G. Intel has a launch MSRP of $309, while AMD's launch MSRP is not listed in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 330 scores 4088 in passmark_single_thread, which is 6.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G's score of 3829.

Q: Why does the AMD processor have a much higher average benchmark score?

A: AMD's avgBenchmarkScore is 40718 versus Intel's 18345. The gap comes from AMD's large wins in integer math, data compression, and multithreaded tests, where AMD leads by 91.6%, 74.5%, and 31.1% respectively.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any benchmark categories?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 330 wins passmark_find_prime_numbers by 51.8%, passmark_physics by 16.8%, passmark_single_thread by 6.3%, and passmark_floating_point_math by 0.9%.

Q: What is the difference in thread counts between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Intel Core 5 330 has 6 threads from 6 cores.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth specifications compare?

A: AMD supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports single-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: AMD ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while Intel ranks in the 72nd percentile.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors designed for different workloads and power envelopes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G delivers substantially higher multithreaded throughput, particularly in integer-heavy operations, data compression, and encryption. Its 91.6% lead in integer math and 74.5% lead in data compression indicate a processor that excels at parallel compute tasks. The 87th percentile ranking and average score of 40718 place it firmly in a higher performance tier, with nearest rivals all within 0.5% of its score.

The Intel Core 5 330 wins the single-threaded tests, including a 6.3% lead in passmark_single_thread and a 51.8% lead in prime number finding. Its floating-point math score is nearly identical to AMD's, within 0.9%. The 15 watt TDP and mobile socket position it for power-constrained systems, while the 72nd percentile ranking and average score of 18345 place it among entry-level desktop competitors like the Core i3-14100 and Core i3-13100, which sit within 0.2% of its score.

For workloads that rely on multithreaded integer performance, data compression, or encryption, the AMD processor shows a clear advantage in the recorded data. For single-threaded responsiveness, prime number calculations, or physics simulations, the Intel processor takes the lead. The TDP difference of 65 watts versus 15 watts suggests very different thermal and power requirements, with the AMD part likely suited to desktop systems with active cooling and the Intel part designed for thin mobile chassis.

The memory subsystems reinforce this split. AMD's dual-channel 89.6 GB/s configuration provides more than 50% higher bandwidth than Intel's single-channel 59.7 GB/s, which aligns with AMD's stronger multithreaded results. Intel's larger shared L3 cache of 6 MB versus AMD's 4 MB may contribute to its single-thread advantages, though the database does not isolate cache effects from architectural differences.

The process node difference, 4 nm TSMC for AMD versus 3 nm Intel for the Core 5 330, does not translate into a consistent performance advantage for either side. The Intel part wins some tests and the AMD part wins others, with the final win tally at 6 to 5 in AMD's favor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G | Intel Core 5 330 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | March 2026 | April 2026 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $309 |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Part number | 100-000001783 | SAE3G |