AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Intel Xeon 6337P Comparison

The Intel Xeon 6337P and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 are both 6-core, 12-thread processors, but they target different segments and deliver very different performance profiles. The recorded data shows a clear split: the Xeon dominates multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads, while the Ryzen AI takes a narrow lead in a couple of specific single-threaded tasks. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, architectural differences, and the use cases where each processor excels.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data is overwhelmingly in favor of the Intel Xeon 6337P, which wins 13 of the 15 recorded comparisons. The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Xeon scores 18,783 against the Ryzen AI's 11,534, a 62.8% advantage. This is a massive gap that indicates the Xeon is far better suited for sustained, heavily threaded rendering or simulation work.

Another significant win for the Xeon comes in the PassMark physics test, where it scores 1,729 versus 1,084, a 59.5% difference. This test often correlates with gaming physics and general simulation performance, where the Xeon's higher boost clock and architecture provide a clear edge. The Xeon also leads by 47.1% in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2,651 versus 1,802, and by 45.9% in PassMark find prime numbers, scoring 108 versus 74.

The Xeon continues its dominance in floating-point math, scoring 53,150 versus 39,662, a 34% lead, and in PassMark multi-thread, scoring 22,098 versus 19,215, a 15% advantage. Integer math also goes to the Xeon, with a 14.3% lead (72,301 versus 63,233). Data encryption favors the Xeon by 12.4% (12,604 versus 11,212), and single-thread performance in PassMark shows the Xeon ahead by 9.2% (4,104 versus 3,758).

The remaining Xeon wins are narrower but consistent: data compression by 7.1% (237,373 versus 221,581), random string sorting by 7.4% (26,135 versus 24,334), and Cinebench R15 multi-core by 8.6% (1,893 versus 1,743). The only two wins for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 are in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 276 versus 267, a 3.3% lead, and in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 15,721 versus 15,366, a 2.3% lead. These are small margins, but they show that in certain light, instruction-level tasks, the AMD part is not completely outclassed.

Overall, the average benchmark score for the Xeon is 28,333, placing it in the 80th percentile. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has an average score of 27,932, also in the 80th percentile. The Xeon's closest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-11950H (delta 0%) and AMD Ryzen 7 7735U (delta -0.1%), while the Ryzen AI's rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (delta 0.1%) and Intel Core i9-10900K (delta 0.2%). These comparisons show that despite the Xeon's wins in this head-to-head, both processors are positioned similarly in the broader performance landscape.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is stark. The Intel Xeon 6337P uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 163 mm². It is part of the Xeon 6 generation and is manufactured by Intel. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Krackan Point codename, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 195 mm². It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores.

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, but their cache layouts differ. The Xeon has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a larger 18 MB shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI has the same 80 KB L1 per core, but 1 MB of L2 per core and only 8 MB of L3 cache. This smaller L3 cache may contribute to the Xeon's advantage in workloads that benefit from larger shared pools of data.

The process node difference is notable: Intel's 10 nm versus TSMC's 4 nm. While the data does not provide direct efficiency comparisons, the TDP tells a story. The Xeon is rated at 80 W, while the Ryzen AI is rated at just 28 W. This aligns with their target markets: the Xeon is a server/workstation part on Intel Socket 1700, while the Ryzen AI is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8.

Memory support also diverges. The Xeon supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Ryzen AI supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Xeon offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen AI offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Ryzen AI includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics, while the Xeon has no integrated graphics.

The Xeon has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, while the Ryzen AI has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Xeon's higher clocks, especially the boost, likely explain its substantial lead in single-threaded and physics-based benchmarks. The Xeon was released on 2025-02-23, while the Ryzen AI was released earlier on 2025-01-05.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon 6337P is the clear winner for multi-threaded, compute-heavy workloads. Its 62.8% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core makes it the obvious choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and other tasks that can use all available threads. The 59.5% lead in physics simulation and the 45.9% lead in prime number finding also point to strong performance in scientific computing and financial modeling. The Xeon's higher TDP of 80 W and its server/workstation market segment confirm it is built for sustained, heavy-duty processing.

The Xeon also wins in single-threaded performance in most tests, including a 47.1% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and a 9.2% lead in PassMark single-thread. This means it is not just a multi-core brute; it also handles lightly threaded applications with more speed. For users who need a workstation CPU that can handle both a single demanding thread and a heavily loaded system, the Xeon is the superior part.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 wins in only two specific areas: Cinebench R15 single-core and PassMark extended instructions. The margins are small (3.3% and 2.3%, respectively), but they indicate that for certain legacy or instruction-specific workloads, the AMD part can edge ahead. However, these wins are narrow and do not compensate for the Xeon's advantages elsewhere.

The Ryzen AI's real strength lies in its power efficiency. With a 28 W TDP versus the Xeon's 80 W, it is designed for mobile platforms where battery life and thermal management are critical. Its integrated Radeon 840M graphics also make it a more complete package for a thin-and-light laptop, as no discrete GPU is required for basic display output. For mobile users who need a capable 6-core processor for everyday productivity and light content creation, the Ryzen AI is the appropriate choice, despite losing most benchmarks to the Xeon.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Xeon 6337P is significantly faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 18,783 versus the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340's 11,534, a 62.8% lead.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins two out of 15 head-to-head comparisons. It leads in Cinebench R15 single-core (276 versus 267, a 3.3% advantage) and in PassMark extended instructions (15,721 versus 15,366, a 2.3% advantage).

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon 6337P has a TDP of 80 W, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has a TDP of 28 W. This makes the AMD part much more suited for mobile or power-constrained environments.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon 6337P and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Xeon 6337P has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What are the socket types for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon 6337P uses Intel Socket 1700, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses AMD Socket FP8.

Specification Differences

The following are the key specification differences between the Intel Xeon 6337P and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, based on the recorded data:

• Base Clock: Intel Xeon 6337P: 3.50 GHz; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 2.00 GHz
• Boost Clock: Intel Xeon 6337P: 5.30 GHz; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 4.80 GHz
• TDP: Intel Xeon 6337P: 80 W; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 28 W
• Socket: Intel Xeon 6337P: Intel Socket 1700; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: AMD Socket FP8
• Architecture: Intel Xeon 6337P: Raptor Lake; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: Zen 5
• Codename: Intel Xeon 6337P: Raptor Lake-R; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: Krackan Point
• Process Node: Intel Xeon 6337P: 10 nm (Intel); AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 4 nm (TSMC)
• Die Size: Intel Xeon 6337P: 163 mm²; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 195 mm²
• L2 Cache: Intel Xeon 6337P: 1.25 MB (per core); AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 1 MB (per core)
• L3 Cache: Intel Xeon 6337P: 18 MB (shared); AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 8 MB
• Memory Support: Intel Xeon 6337P: DDR4, DDR5; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: DDR5, LPDDR5X
• Memory Bandwidth: Intel Xeon 6337P: N/A; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: 89.6 GB/s
• PCIe: Intel Xeon 6337P: Gen 5, 16 Lanes; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: Gen 4, 16 Lanes
• Integrated Graphics: Intel Xeon 6337P: N/A; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: Radeon 840M
• Market Segment: Intel Xeon 6337P: Server/Workstation; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: Mobile
• Launch MSRP: Intel Xeon 6337P: $375; AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: N/A