AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500T and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 are both 80th-percentile performers, yet they achieve that standing through radically different designs. The Intel part is a 14-core desktop processor built on a 10 nm process, while the AMD is a 6-core mobile chip on a 4 nm node. Benchmark results show the Intel winning 12 of 15 head-to-head tests, often by double-digit margins, but the AMD counters with superior single-core scores in two of three wins. This analysis walks through the architectural split, the exact benchmark deltas, and the use-case implications.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for both CPUs?

A: Both processors boost to 4.80 GHz. Their base clocks differ, with the Intel at 1.70 GHz and the AMD at 2.00 GHz.

Q: Which CPU wins in multi-core rendering benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in Cinebench R15 multi-core by 16% (2022 vs 1743) and in Cinebench R23 multi-core by 2.2% (11790 vs 11534).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 win any single-core tests?

A: Yes, the AMD wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 8.7% (276 vs 252) and PassMark single-thread by 0.6% (3758 vs 3736).

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a 35 W TDP, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has a 28 W TDP.

Q: Which CPU supports faster PCIe lanes?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from opposite ends of the design spectrum. The Intel Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700 with a 35 W TDP.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a hybrid design of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The cache is smaller: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. This is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8 with a 28 W TDP.

Memory support differs significantly. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD has an explicit memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s, which the Intel pack does not list. Both support ECC memory. The integrated graphics differ: Intel uses UHD Graphics 770, while AMD uses Radeon 840M.

The process node gap is notable — 10 nm vs 4 nm — which likely explains the AMD's lower TDP despite the smaller core count. The Intel's larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB) is a major architectural advantage for workloads that benefit from shared cache. Both have locked multipliers, and both are currently active in production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: Intel dominates multi-threaded and math-heavy workloads, while AMD takes narrow single-thread wins. The biggest Intel victory is in PassMark floating point math, where it scores 58869 against AMD's 39662, a 48.4% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison.

PassMark data encryption shows a 37.4% Intel lead (15410 vs 11212), and integer math follows with a 28% lead (80922 vs 63233). The PassMark multithread test gives Intel a 19.2% edge (22910 vs 19215), and data compression shows an 18.4% lead (262417 vs 221581). Random string sorting is 17% in Intel's favor (28462 vs 24334).

Cinebench results are closer. In R15 multi-core, Intel wins 2022 to 1743, a 16% margin. In R23 multi-core, the gap narrows to 2.2% (11790 vs 11534). The physics test shows an 18.8% Intel lead (1288 vs 1084), and find prime numbers gives Intel 9.5% (81 vs 74). Extended instructions are nearly tied, with Intel ahead by 2% (16043 vs 15721).

The AMD wins are confined to single-thread tests. The most significant is Cinebench R15 single-core, where AMD scores 276 against Intel's 252, an 8.7% advantage. PassMark single-thread is a narrow 0.6% AMD win (3758 vs 3736). Interestingly, Cinebench R23 single-core goes to Intel by 2% (1838 vs 1802), despite the AMD wins in other single-thread tests.

Overall, Intel wins 12 of 15 head-to-head benchmarks. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 28065 for Intel vs 27932 for AMD — which explains why both sit at the 80th percentile. The Intel's wins are often large, but the AMD's single-core victories show it can compete in lightly threaded scenarios.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-14500T for most workloads. It wins 12 of 15 benchmarks, with particularly strong showings in floating point math (48.4% ahead), data encryption (37.4% ahead), and integer math (28% ahead). The 14-core, 20-thread configuration provides a substantial multi-threading advantage over the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the better choice for single-thread-sensitive applications. It wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 8.7% and PassMark single-thread by 0.6%. Its 2.00 GHz base clock is higher than the Intel's 1.70 GHz, and its 28 W TDP is lower, which may matter for mobile or thermally constrained systems.

For desktop users seeking the best overall performance, the Intel Core i5-14500T is the data-backed pick. Its average benchmark score of 28065 is slightly higher than AMD's 27932, but the real story is the distribution of wins — Intel's margins in compute-heavy tests are far larger than AMD's narrow single-thread edges.

For users who prioritize single-core responsiveness or require the lowest power draw, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 offers a compelling alternative. Its 8.7% single-core win in Cinebench R15 is meaningful, and its 28 W TDP represents a 20% reduction compared to Intel's 35 W.

The Intel chip also carries a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD has no listed launch MSRP. Both processors support ECC memory, but the Intel's dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) offers more flexibility for existing systems.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 1.70 GHz for Intel and 2.00 GHz for AMD, though both boost to 4.80 GHz.

TDP ratings differ by 7 W — Intel at 35 W, AMD at 28 W. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel chip, AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD chip. Process nodes are 10 nm (Intel) vs 4 nm (AMD), with foundries being Intel and TSMC respectively. Die sizes are 215 mm² for Intel and 195 mm² for AMD.

Cache configurations are notably different. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, but L2 differs: 1.25 MB per core for Intel vs 1 MB per core for AMD. L3 cache shows the biggest gap: 24 MB shared for Intel vs 8 MB for AMD.

Memory support diverges, with Intel offering DDR4 and DDR5 while AMD offers DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's is not listed. Both support dual-channel memory and ECC. PCIe generations differ: Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes, AMD has Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics are different: UHD Graphics 770 for Intel, Radeon 840M for AMD. Market segments are Desktop for Intel and Mobile for AMD. Release dates are roughly a year apart, with Intel launching on 2024-01-07 and AMD on 2025-01-05. Both are active and have locked multipliers. The Intel part number is SRN3P, while AMD's is 100-000001600.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in scenarios that demand raw compute throughput. Floating point math is its strongest category, with a 48.4% lead over AMD. Data encryption (37.4% lead) and integer math (28% lead) follow closely. These results suggest the Intel chip is well-suited for scientific computing, financial modeling, and any workload that relies heavily on arithmetic operations.

Multi-threaded applications heavily favor Intel. The PassMark multithread score shows a 19.2% lead, and Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a 16% advantage. Data compression (18.4% lead) and random string sorting (17% lead) are also Intel-favored. This makes the Intel chip the better choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and server-style workloads that can utilize all 20 threads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 wins in single-thread performance, specifically in Cinebench R15 single-core with an 8.7% advantage. Its PassMark single-thread win is marginal at 0.6%. This suggests the AMD chip excels in lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that runs on a single core. The higher base clock of 2.00 GHz may contribute to this responsiveness.

The AMD also wins on power efficiency, with a 28 W TDP compared to Intel's 35 W. For mobile or battery-powered systems, this lower power draw is a clear advantage. The smaller die size (195 mm² vs 215 mm²) and more advanced 4 nm process node support this efficiency profile.

In mixed workloads, the Cinebench R23 tests show a near tie. The Intel wins multi-core by 2.2% and single-core by 2%, but these margins are small. The PassMark extended instructions test is also nearly even, with Intel ahead by 2%. For general-purpose computing, either chip would deliver similar average performance — the Intel's average benchmark score is 28065, and the AMD's is 27932.