AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, while the Intel Arc G3 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for any workload. The AMD processor's recorded data spans Cinebench R15 and R23, plus the Passmark suite, covering multi-core, single-core, encryption, compression, physics, and integer workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11534 and a single-core score of 1802. In Cinebench R15, it records 1743 multi-core and 276 single-core. The Passmark multi-thread score is 19215, with a single-thread score of 3758. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 27932.

Looking at the AMD part's nearest rivals in the database, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 sits within a tight cluster. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which posts an average score of 27896. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U at 27887 and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872. The only rival ahead of it is the Intel Core i9-12900H at 28003, where the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 trails by 0.3%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, placing the AMD processor in a performance band that spans roughly 27872 to 28003 on average score.

The Intel Arc G3 has an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, compared to the AMD part's 80. The arc G3's lack of recorded results means the database cannot verify any performance claim for it, and its 50th percentile ranking appears to reflect an absence of data rather than a measured performance level.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, the recorded data shows strengths across all measured categories. The Passmark integer math score of 63233 and floating point math score of 39662 indicate strong general arithmetic throughput. Data encryption reaches 11212, while data compression records 221581. Random string sorting posts 24334, and extended instructions score 15721. Find prime numbers is the lowest result at 74, which is typical for a workload that stresses branch-heavy single-threaded execution.

The single-core results of 1802 in Cinebench R23 and 3758 in Passmark single-thread show a capable per-thread performer. The multi-core results of 11534 in Cinebench R23 and 19215 in Passmark multi-thread, combined with 12 threads, indicate scaling across the 6 cores. The physics score of 1084 in Passmark offers another view of multi-threaded compute.

For the Intel Arc G3, there are no wins recorded in the database because no benchmark scores exist. The processor's specifications show 14 cores and 14 threads, which suggests a different threading model than the AMD part, but without measured data, no performance advantage can be assigned. The Arc G3's 50th percentile rank and zero average score mean the database treats it as an unmeasured entry. Any discussion of where it wins must remain qualitative, and the data simply does not support a claim of superiority in any tested category.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the only one of the two processors with verified performance measurements. Its 80th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, combined with an average benchmark score of 27932, places it in the same performance class as the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Intel Core i9-10900K, and Intel Core i9-12900H. The largest gap in that group is 0.3%, which is negligible in practical terms.

The Intel Arc G3, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark data. Its 50th percentile rank and average score of 0 indicate that the database has not yet validated its performance. For a user relying strictly on measured results, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the only choice supported by evidence. The Arc G3's specifications may eventually translate into competitive scores, but the current database does not contain that information.

The AMD processor's 6 cores and 12 threads, paired with its benchmark results, show a balanced single-thread and multi-thread profile. The Arc G3's 14 cores and 14 threads indicate a wider core count but no hyper-threading, which may affect its scaling in threaded workloads. Without numbers, the verdict must favor the AMD part on the basis of available data alone.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc G3 has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 compare to its closest rivals?

A: It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900K, and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-12900H.

Q: What is the AMD processor's best recorded multi-core score?

A: The highest multi-core result is 11534 in Cinebench R23, with 1743 in Cinebench R15 and 19215 in Passmark multi-thread.

Q: What is the AMD processor's single-core performance?

A: It records 1802 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 276 in Cinebench R15 single-core, and 3758 in Passmark single-thread.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile rank in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 ranks in the 80th percentile, while the Intel Arc G3 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Krackan Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation. It is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename, belongs to the Arc G3 generation, and is built on a 3 nm process by Intel. Its die size is not recorded.

The AMD part's cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor has a larger L3 cache by 10 MB and larger per-core L1 and L2 caches.

The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports only LPDDR5X. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD part records 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Intel part records 136.5 GB/s, a difference of 46.9 GB/s. The AMD processor supports ECC memory; the Intel processor does not.

PCIe connectivity differs significantly. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 4 lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 840M, and the Intel part uses the Arc B370.

Both processors are mobile parts with active production status. The AMD part was released on 2025-01-05, and the Intel part on 2026-05-27. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ: AMD has 6 cores, Intel has 14. Thread counts differ correspondingly: AMD has 12 threads, Intel has 14. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel base clock is 1.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part has a TDP of 25.

The sockets are different: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel BGA 2540. The process nodes differ: AMD is on 4 nm from TSMC, Intel is on 3 nm from Intel's own foundry. The AMD die size is 195 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Memory bandwidth differs as noted: 89.6 GB/s for AMD versus 136.5 GB/s for Intel. ECC support is present on AMD only. PCIe generation and lane counts differ: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 4 lanes for Intel. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 840M for AMD and the Arc B370 for Intel.

The part numbers are 100-000001600 for AMD and SA4QZ for Intel. The AMD release date is 2025-01-05, and the Intel release date is 2026-05-27. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded, and neither does the Intel processor.