AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration difference between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel part offers more than double the core count and 67% more threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T boosts to 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE's 4.80 GHz boost clock. Both have identical 35W TDP ratings.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14600T supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database.

Q: How do the cache hierarchies compare between the two?

A: Both have 80 KB L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB total L3. The Intel part has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3, which is three times the L3 capacity.

Q: What are the socket and platform requirements for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core i5-14600T uses Intel Socket 1700. They are not interchangeable on any motherboard.

Q: Which processor has a higher overall benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE is at the 50th percentile. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 32707, while the AMD chip has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14600T uses a 10 nm process from Intel's own fabs. This process gap likely contributes to the AMD chip's smaller die size of 195 mm² compared to the Intel chip's 257 mm², despite the Intel part containing more cores and cache.

The AMD processor belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation with the codename "Gorgon Point" and uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement. The Intel processor is from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture with the codename "Raptor Lake-R" as a refresh of the previous generation. These are entirely different microarchitectures with distinct instruction handling and scheduling behaviors.

The core composition differs substantially. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, meaning it likely relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach that thread count. The Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads, which suggests a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake designs. The database does not specify the exact core type mix for either chip, but the thread count difference of 8 threads is a major architectural distinction.

Cache organization also diverges. The AMD chip uses 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB total L3, while the Intel chip uses 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel part's larger shared L3 pool can feed more cores and threads during multi-threaded workloads. The AMD chip's smaller L3 is consistent with its lower core count.

Memory support shows another architectural split. The AMD chip supports only DDR5, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. This means platform flexibility favors the Intel chip, but the AMD chip records a specific memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which the Intel chip does not have recorded. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip uses Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not provide comparative graphics performance scores, so the analysis must remain qualitative on this point. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked.

Process node and foundry differences are notable. The AMD chip is fabricated at 4 nm by TSMC, while the Intel chip is fabricated at 10 nm by Intel. The AMD chip dies at 195 mm², which is smaller than the Intel die at 257 mm², even though the Intel chip has more cores, threads, and L3 cache.

The Verdict

The recorded benchmark data in the database contains a complete set of scores for the Intel Core i5-14600T but none for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE. This absence means the AMD chip's real-world performance cannot be directly quantified from the database. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 32707, and it holds the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits at the 50th percentile.

The Intel Core i5-14600T clearly offers a higher core count (14 vs 6), more threads (20 vs 12), a higher boost clock (5.10 GHz vs 4.80 GHz), and three times the L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB). Its benchmark scores, such as 22447 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 12840 in Geekbench multi-core, provide concrete performance reference points. The AMD chip has no such recorded scores.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE counters with a smaller process node (4 nm vs 10 nm), a smaller die (195 mm² vs 257 mm²), a lower base clock (2.00 GHz vs 1.80 GHz), and an unlocked multiplier. It also supports only DDR5, which may simplify platform design but limits memory choice.

The database indicates that the Intel chip is the stronger performer based on available data, especially for multi-threaded tasks where its additional cores and cache should provide substantial advantages. The AMD chip's strengths lie in its manufacturing efficiency and overclocking flexibility, but without benchmark scores, its performance cannot be substantiated.

Users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput and have workloads that scale across many cores would likely favor the Intel chip based on the recorded scores. Users who prioritize platform power efficiency and overclocking may consider the AMD chip, but the data does not currently support a performance comparison in its favor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE | Intel Core i5-14600T |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 35W | 35W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $255 |

The two chips share the same 35W TDP and dual-channel memory bus, and both support ECC memory. The Intel chip has a higher boost clock by 0.30 GHz, while the AMD chip has a higher base clock by 0.20 GHz. The Intel chip was released earlier, in January 2024, while the AMD chip's release date is recorded as February 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. However, the Intel Core i5-14600T has a full suite of individual benchmark scores that can be examined. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no recorded benchmark scores at all.

For the Intel chip, Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 22447, and single-core scores 3169. In Cinebench R20, multi-core reaches 9427 and single-core 1330. Cinebench R15 shows 2262 multi-core and 319 single-core. Geekbench multi-core records 12840 and single-core 2559.

The PassMark suite for the Intel chip shows varied results across workload types. Integer math scores 95112, floating point math 64726, data compression 301827, data encryption 18226, extended instructions 16985, find prime numbers 121, physics 1873, random string sorting 34310, and multi-thread 26409. Single-thread scores 3744 in both PassMark single_thread and singlethread tests.

The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average score of 32697 with a delta of 0%, meaning it performs essentially identically. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 with a delta of -0.1%, slightly higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 with a delta of 0.1%, slightly lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 with a delta of -0.3%, the highest of the group.

These deltas indicate that the Intel Core i5-14600T performs within 0.3% of several comparable processors, placing it in a tight performance cluster. Its 83rd percentile ranking confirms it is above the median CPU in the database.

Without any scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, no direct wins can be recorded for either chip in a head-to-head comparison. The Intel chip's individual scores stand as the only measured performance data available.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14600T demonstrates clear advantages in multi-threaded workloads, as its 14 cores and 20 threads should drive higher throughput in parallel tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26409 establish a strong baseline for such workloads. Its 24 MB shared L3 cache likely benefits workloads with large working sets, such as data compression, which scores 301827 in PassMark.

The Intel chip also wins on raw clock speed, with a 5.10 GHz boost clock that supports its single-core scores of 3169 in Cinebench R23 and 3744 in PassMark single-thread. The 83rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 32707 reinforce its position as a strong all-around desktop processor.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE's recorded advantages are architectural rather than performance-based. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology, which could translate to better power efficiency per unit of work, though no efficiency measurements are recorded. Its smaller die size of 195 mm² suggests lower manufacturing costs per chip, but pricing is not analyzed here.

The AMD chip's unlocked multiplier offers overclocking flexibility that the locked Intel chip does not provide. Its DDR5-only memory support and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth are recorded specifications, but the Intel chip's memory bandwidth is not recorded, so no comparison is possible. The AMD chip also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes, while the Intel chip supports the newer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which favors the Intel chip for bandwidth-hungry peripherals.

The 50th percentile ranking for the AMD chip places it at the median of all CPUs, which is a neutral position. With no benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm any workload category where the AMD chip outperforms the Intel chip. The Intel chip's measured scores and higher percentile ranking indicate it is the stronger choice for most recorded performance metrics.