AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and Intel Core 7 350 are two recently released processors aimed at different market segments, with the AMD part targeting desktops and the Intel part targeting mobile devices. The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two specific CPUs, meaning a comparative analysis must rely on the recorded data for the Intel Core 7 350 and the architectural specifications for both. The Intel Core 7 350 has a recorded average benchmark score of 17779, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a percentile ranking of 50 and no recorded average benchmark score. This disparity in available data shapes the analysis, focusing on what the recorded measurements show for the Intel part and what the specifications indicate for the AMD part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core 7 350 are absent from the database. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. Consequently, there are no exact score differences to report from a direct matchup. The available data instead provides a comprehensive set of benchmark scores for the Intel Core 7 350, which can be examined for its performance characteristics. For the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, the database lists no individual benchmark scores, so its performance profile must be inferred from its core, thread, and clock specifications.

The Intel Core 7 350 delivers a range of recorded scores across various tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1220 in multicore and 292 in singlecore. Cinebench R20 results show 5373 for multicore and 758 for singlecore. The Cinebench R23 test yields 8030 for multicore and 2046 for singlecore. PassMark tests reveal a single-thread score of 4100, a multithread score of 15170, integer math at 33734, floating-point math at 42809, and extended instructions at 12045. Data compression in PassMark reaches 143123, data encryption scores 10933, find prime numbers scores 107, physics scores 1173, and random string sorting scores 17238. These numbers indicate a processor with balanced performance across synthetic workloads, with particularly strong results in data compression and floating-point operations.

Since the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no recorded benchmark scores, the head-to-head section cannot provide exact numerical comparisons. The Intel Core 7 350's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core 5 221TE with an average score of 17860 and a delta of -0.5 percent, the AMD EPYC 9374F with 17693 and a delta of 0.5 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT with 17891 and a delta of -0.6 percent, and the Intel Core 5 120U with 17898 and a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas show the Intel Core 7 350 sits within a tight performance cluster, slightly below three of its rivals and slightly above one, indicating its average benchmark score of 17779 is closely matched to these other processors.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head data, the win analysis must consider the architectural and specification differences that would influence performance in specific use cases. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE features 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 also has 6 cores but only 6 threads. This thread advantage for the AMD part suggests it would perform better in heavily multithreaded workloads, such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and scientific simulations, where additional threads allow for parallel task execution. The AMD processor's base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz, combined with its 12 threads, could provide an edge in tasks that scale with thread count. However, the lack of recorded benchmarks for the AMD part means this remains an inference from its specifications rather than a measured outcome.

The Intel Core 7 350, with its recorded benchmark scores, shows strengths in specific PassMark tests. Its data compression score of 143123 is notably high, and its floating-point math score of 42809 indicates strong performance in mathematical operations. The single-thread score of 4100 suggests good responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The Intel part's higher L1 cache per core at 192 KB and L2 cache per core at 2.5 MB, compared to the AMD part's 80 KB and 1 MB respectively, could benefit workloads with frequent data access patterns. The Intel processor's 3 nm process node, manufactured by Intel, may contribute to its efficiency, though specific power consumption figures are not available for comparison.

Use-case splits based on the data point to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE being more suitable for multithreaded productivity tasks due to its 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 350, with its 6 threads and recorded single-thread performance, might be better for everyday computing, office applications, and light content creation where single-core speed matters. The Intel part's memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X, albeit with a single-channel bus, could suit mobile workloads that prioritize power efficiency over raw bandwidth. The AMD part's dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provide a wider data path for memory-intensive applications, potentially aiding in tasks like data analysis or virtual machines.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates the Intel Core 7 350 is a solid performer for its mobile segment, with an average benchmark score of 17779 and a 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, all scoring within a 0.7 percent delta, confirm it competes closely with other mid-range processors. For users requiring a mobile processor with proven benchmark results, the Intel Core 7 350 offers a documented performance profile. The absence of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE means it cannot be compared on measured scores, but its specifications suggest a different use case.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, with its 12 threads and dual-channel memory, is positioned for desktop workloads where multithreading and memory bandwidth are priorities. The Intel Core 7 350, with its 6 threads and single-channel memory, appears optimized for mobile efficiency. The core count difference of 6 threads creates a clear separation: the AMD part likely excels in parallel processing, while the Intel part may lead in single-threaded responsiveness based on its recorded single-thread score of 4100. The verdict from the data is straightforward: choose the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE for desktop multithreaded tasks, and the Intel Core 7 350 for mobile use where its benchmark scores are confirmed.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a recorded average benchmark score of 17779, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the two CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, whereas the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the AMD and Intel processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core 7 350 supports single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 350 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core 7 350 does not support ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, and the Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process node from Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher L3 cache capacity?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core 7 350 are substantial. The AMD part is based on the Gorgon Point codename, with a generation identified as Ryzen AI 400 using Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part uses the Wildcat Lake codename, with a generation listed as Core 5 using Wildcat Lake architecture. Both processors have 6 cores, but the AMD part doubles the thread count to 12, indicating simultaneous multithreading support, while the Intel part lacks this feature. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, and the Intel processor uses a 3 nm process node by Intel. The AMD die size is 195 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the Intel part may improve data locality for single-threaded tasks, while the larger L3 cache on the AMD part could benefit multi-threaded workloads. Memory support also diverges: the AMD part supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and ECC memory, while the Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus and no ECC. The PCIe lanes differ, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part offering Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are a Radeon 840M on the AMD part and Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores on the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two processors are focused on fields where they diverge. The base clock differs: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 350 runs at 1.50 GHz. The boost clock is identical at 4.80 GHz for both. The thermal design power (TDP) shows a significant difference: the AMD part is rated at 35 watts, and the Intel part is rated at 15 watts. The sockets are distinct, with the AMD part using AMD Socket AM5 and the Intel part using Intel BGA 1516. The market segment differs, with the AMD part being Desktop and the Intel part being Mobile. The release dates are recorded as 2026-02-28 for the AMD part and 2026-04-15 for the Intel part. The Intel Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no launch MSRP recorded. The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD part and locked on the Intel part. The part numbers are 100-000001925 for AMD and SAE3F for Intel. The process node, foundry, memory bandwidth, ECC support, PCIe lanes, integrated graphics, and cache capacities all differ as detailed in the architecture section.