AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core 7 150UL. Both processors share an identical percentile ranking of 50 against all CPUs in the database, indicating that neither part has a measured performance advantage in the available dataset. The average benchmark score for both units is recorded as zero, which means the two chips are statistically indistinguishable based on the metrics currently tracked.

Without direct benchmark results, the comparison must rely on the architectural and specification data available. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 150UL runs at a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part reaches a higher maximum frequency by 0.20 GHz, but the AMD part starts from a higher base clock by 0.30 GHz. In lightly threaded workloads where boost clocks matter, the Intel chip has a nominal edge; in sustained all-core loads, the AMD chip's higher base clock could help maintain performance without relying on boost headroom.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses 10 cores and 12 threads. Both parts expose 12 threads to the operating system, so thread scheduling and parallel workloads should see similar throughput in theory. However, the Intel chip packs four additional physical cores, which can matter in workloads that scale with core count rather than thread count, such as certain rendering tasks or heavily multithreaded productivity applications. The AMD chip's 6-core, 12-thread layout relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach parity in thread count, whereas the Intel chip achieves 12 threads with 10 physical cores and only 2 of those cores using Hyper-Threading.

The thermal design power figures separate these two parts clearly. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts. This 20-watt difference suggests the Intel part is designed for lower power envelopes and potentially quieter or smaller cooling solutions, while the AMD part is configured for higher sustained performance within a more generous power budget. The database shows no performance scores to confirm whether that extra power translates into a real-world win.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores. Both processors expose 12 threads to software.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL boosts to 5.00 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE's 4.80 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel Core 7 150UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part holds a 4 MB advantage in this tier.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core 7 150UL does not.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE is built on a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, codenamed Gorgon Point, and uses a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 7 150UL is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS family. These are fundamentally different designs aimed at different priorities.

The manufacturing process separates the two clearly. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD chip's die size is recorded as 195 mm², while Intel's die size is not listed in the database. A smaller process node typically allows for better power efficiency and higher transistor density, but the database does not provide direct efficiency measurements to confirm this here.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap, with the Intel Core 7 150UL offering 12 MB shared L3 versus the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE's 8 MB L3. This 4 MB difference in the final cache tier could benefit the Intel part in workloads that repeatedly access a moderately sized working set.

Memory support marks another architectural split. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE supports DDR5 memory exclusively and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 150UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part. For systems requiring error-correcting memory, the AMD processor is the only option between these two.

PCI Express connectivity differs as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 7 150UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part offers 4 additional CPU-attached lanes, which can matter for configurations with multiple NVMe drives or expansion cards that rely on direct CPU connectivity.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses a Radeon 840M iGPU, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores, so a direct performance comparison of the iGPUs is not possible from the recorded data.

The socket and platform differ entirely. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. These are not cross-compatible platforms, so the motherboard choice determines which processor can be used. The AMD chip's multiplier is unlocked for overclocking, while the Intel chip's multiplier is locked. The AMD chip is also newer, with a release date of 2026-02-28, compared to the Intel chip's release date of 2024-04-07.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors with different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE targets a 35-watt envelope with a smaller 4 nm process, DDR5-only memory, ECC support, 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, an unlocked multiplier, and a newer release date. The Intel Core 7 150UL targets a 15-watt envelope with a larger 10 nm process, dual memory support, 12 MB of L3 cache, 10 physical cores, and a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

The Intel part wins on core count, boost clock, and L3 cache. The AMD part wins on process node, memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s recorded), ECC support, PCIe lane count, and overclocking flexibility. Neither part has recorded benchmark scores or head-to-head results, so the decision rests entirely on which of these specification advantages matters more for the intended use.

The 10-core Intel processor is the choice for workloads that favor additional physical cores and higher boost frequencies. The 6-core AMD processor with the newer process node and unlocked multiplier is the choice for users who prioritize platform features like ECC memory, more PCIe lanes, and overclocking headroom within a 35-watt power class.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors, based solely on the database records:

• Cores: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores; Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores.
• Threads: Both have 12 threads.
• Base Clock: AMD 2.00 GHz; Intel 1.70 GHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD 4.80 GHz; Intel 5.00 GHz.
• TDP: AMD 35 W; Intel 15 W.
• Socket: AMD Socket AM5; Intel Socket 1700.
• Codename: Gorgon Point; Raptor Lake-PS.
• Process Node: 4 nm (TSMC); 10 nm (Intel).
• Die Size: 195 mm²; not recorded.
• L2 Cache: 1 MB per core; 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: 8 MB; 12 MB (shared).
• Memory Support: DDR5 only; DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s; not recorded.
• ECC Memory: Supported; not supported.
• PCIe: Gen 4, 12 lanes; Gen 4, 8 lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 840M; Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.
• Multiplier Unlocked: Yes; no.
• Release Date: 2026-02-28; 2024-04-07.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150UL holds clear specification advantages in several areas. Its 10 physical cores exceed the AMD chip's 6 cores, which matters for multithreaded workloads that scale with core count. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock is higher than the AMD chip's 4.80 GHz, which can help in single-threaded tasks that respond to raw clock speed. Its 12 MB of shared L3 cache doubles the AMD chip's 8 MB, potentially improving performance in workloads with larger working sets. The Intel chip's 15-watt TDP also makes it the more power-efficient option on paper, suited for systems with tighter thermal constraints.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE counters with advantages in other areas. Its 4 nm TSMC process is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node, which typically indicates better transistor density and efficiency. Its base clock of 2.00 GHz is higher than Intel's 1.70 GHz, which helps in sustained all-core workloads that stay at base frequency. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel part, making it the only choice for systems that require error-correcting memory. Its 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes exceed Intel's 8 lanes, providing more direct CPU connectivity for storage and expansion. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which the locked Intel chip cannot offer. The AMD chip also supports DDR5 memory with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

For users working with memory-sensitive applications that can use ECC, or those planning to overclock, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE is the stronger pick. For users running heavily multithreaded workloads, or those who need the lowest power draw and highest boost clock, the Intel Core 7 150UL is the stronger pick. The absence of benchmark scores means these conclusions come entirely from the specification data, not from measured performance.