AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core 5 210H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE. All measured performance data in this comparison comes exclusively from the Intel Core 5 210H. This makes a direct head-to-head score comparison impossible for the AMD side. The Intel Core 5 210H has a complete set of Cinebench and Passmark results, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has zero entries in the benchmark table.

For the Intel Core 5 210H, the recorded data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11830 and a single-core score of 1771. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 6504 with a single-core score of 918. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 1757 and a single-core score of 247. These Cinebench figures represent the full extent of the Intel part's rendering performance profile in the database.

Passmark results for the Intel Core 5 210H cover a wide range of workloads. The multi-thread score is 18252, while single-thread performance registers at 3539. Integer math scores 61503, floating point math scores 45057, and extended instructions score 13370. Data compression scores 217805, data encryption scores 12187, and random string sorting scores 23451. The find prime numbers test scores 53, and the physics test scores 1040.

The average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 210H is 24872, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the Intel Core i7-13620H at 24911 with a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX at 24822 with a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24935 with a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F at 24964 with a delta of -0.4%. These deltas show the Intel Core 5 210H sits within a tight cluster of similarly performing processors, effectively tied with each rival on average score.

Since the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head analysis cannot assign wins to either side. The win count stands at zero for both processors. Any comparison of raw performance between these two chips must remain qualitative, based on their specification differences rather than measured results.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear distinction between these two processors for different user profiles. The Intel Core 5 210H is a fully measured part with a 77th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 24872. It has a complete performance record across 17 benchmark tests, making it a known quantity for workloads like rendering, encryption, and math processing.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no measured performance data in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking appears based on specifications rather than test results, and its average benchmark score is zero. This absence of data means the AMD part cannot be evaluated on measured performance. A builder choosing between these two chips must weigh the Intel part's confirmed results against the AMD part's unverified specifications.

The Intel Core 5 210H carries a launch MSRP of $342. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 1744, while the AMD part is a desktop processor on AMD Socket AM5. These platform differences matter more than raw specifications for many buyers.

From the data alone, the Intel Core 5 210H is the safer choice for anyone needing verified performance numbers. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE offers specifications that suggest capability, but without benchmark results, its real-world behavior remains unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H has an average benchmark score of 24872. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H ranks at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any recorded Cinebench results?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has an empty benchmarks list. All Cinebench results in this comparison belong to the Intel Core 5 210H.

Q: What is the closest rival to the Intel Core 5 210H by average score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is the closest, with an average score of 24822 and a delta of 0.2% relative to the Intel Core 5 210H's 24872.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 210H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth rating for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 210H has no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 210H uses 8 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel part at 2.20 GHz. Both boost to 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power differs, with the AMD part rated at 35 watts and the Intel part at 45 watts.

Socket and platform differ completely. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE fits AMD Socket AM5 and is a desktop processor. The Intel Core 5 210H fits Intel BGA 1744 and is a mobile processor. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked.

Memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part has no bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported by the AMD part but not by the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 12 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 8 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon 840M, the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 48EU.

Production status is active for both. Release dates differ: the AMD part released on 2026-02-28, the Intel part on 2024-12-17. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $342, while the AMD part has none recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses the Gorgon Point codename from the Ryzen AI 400 generation, built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename from the Core 5 Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Process nodes differ substantially. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die size is recorded as 195 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Cache layouts differ between the two. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part carries more total cache, particularly 50% more L3.

No transistor counts are recorded for either processor. Neither part has 3D V-Cache. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process with a 195 mm² die, suggesting a denser transistor layout, but the database does not provide transistor figures to confirm this.

The integrated graphics differ by architecture as well. The AMD part uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. These are distinct GPU designs with different driver ecosystems and feature sets.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 210H wins on measured performance. It has a 77th percentile ranking, an average benchmark score of 24872, and a full suite of 17 benchmark results. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its average score, placing it in a crowded but competitive performance tier. The data shows it delivers 11830 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1771 in single-core, with strong Passmark results across integer math, floating point math, and data compression.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE wins on platform features. It supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. It has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has none recorded. It uses an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, whereas the Intel part is locked. It fits the AM5 desktop socket with a 35 watt TDP, versus the Intel part's 45 watt TDP on a mobile BGA socket.

The AMD part also wins on process technology. Its 4 nm TSMC node is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node. The AMD die size of 195 mm² is recorded, while the Intel die size is unknown. The AMD part supports only DDR5, which may be a limitation, but its ECC support and higher rated memory bandwidth give it an edge for workstation-style builds.

The Intel part wins on core count and cache. It has 8 cores versus 6, and 12 MB of shared L3 versus 8 MB. It also has 2 MB of L2 per core versus 1 MB. For multi-threaded workloads that scale with core count and cache, the Intel part has a structural advantage, though no benchmark data exists to confirm how the AMD part responds.

The Intel part wins on legacy memory compatibility. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports DDR5 only. This makes the Intel part more flexible for users with existing DDR4 memory.

For a desktop builder prioritizing ECC, overclocking, and a newer process node, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has the specification advantage. For a mobile buyer needing verified performance numbers, higher core count, and more cache, the Intel Core 5 210H is the only measured option. The database cannot confirm AMD performance claims, so any decision favoring the AMD part rests on specifications alone.