AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G vs Intel Core 7 250H Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core 7 250H, but no comparable benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G. The database shows the Intel part with an average benchmark score of 35,728 and a percentile rank of 85 among all CPUs, while the AMD part has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. This absence of measured results for the AMD chip means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on architectural specifications and the Intel part's performance profile.

The Intel Core 7 250H delivers 16,561 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9,697 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 3,147 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core results are 1,931 in Cinebench R23, 1,368 in Cinebench R20, and 298 in Cinebench R15. PassMark tests show 27,030 in multithread, 4,148 in single-thread, 99,100 in integer math, 65,094 in floating-point math, 303,269 in data compression, 18,206 in data encryption, 17,318 in extended instructions, and 34,136 in random string sorting.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 7 250H include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 with an average score of 35,719 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35,670 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 at 35,802 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35,909 (0.5% behind). These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the Core 7 250H sits in a tightly clustered performance band where the top four competitors are within 0.7% of each other.

The absence of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G prevents any direct score-to-score comparison. The database records zero measured results for that processor, so all performance inferences must come from its core configuration, clock speeds, and cache hierarchy. The Intel part's 85th percentile ranking places it well above the AMD part's 50th percentile, though this percentile difference reflects the lack of recorded measurements for the AMD chip rather than a direct comparison.

# Where Each One Wins

For the Intel Core 7 250H, the data shows clear strengths in heavily threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,561 and PassMark multithread score of 27,030 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide substantial thread-level parallelism, and the 24 MB shared L3 cache supports data-intensive operations. PassMark data compression at 303,269 and integer math at 99,100 suggest particular competence in workloads that benefit from large caches and many execution units.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G presents a different profile based on its specifications. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it offers half the cores and 8 fewer threads than the Intel part. However, its 4 nm process node from TSMC, compared to Intel's 10 nm node, indicates a more advanced manufacturing process. The AMD chip uses Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores under the Gorgon Point codename, suggesting modern core architecture. Its boost clock of 4.50 GHz trails the Intel part's 5.40 GHz, but the AMD chip has a higher TDP of 65 watts versus 45 watts for Intel.

Single-thread performance for the Intel part, measured at 4,148 in PassMark single-thread and 1,931 in Cinebench R23 single-core, benefits from the 5.40 GHz boost clock. The AMD chip's 4.50 GHz boost clock is 0.90 GHz lower, which likely places it behind in single-threaded responsiveness, though no direct measurement exists in the database. The AMD chip does support ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part, which matters for data integrity in specific professional workloads.

# Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Core 7 250H uses a 10 nm Intel process. This node difference affects transistor density and power efficiency characteristics, though the AMD part's higher 65 W TDP versus 45 W for Intel suggests the AMD design prioritizes sustained performance over power economy.

The AMD chip belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation under the Gorgon Point codename, using Zen 5 / Zen 5c core architecture. The Intel chip is part of the Core 7 series under Raptor Lake-H, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. These represent fundamentally different core designs from different eras, with Zen 5 being a newer architecture than Raptor Lake.

Core and thread counts differ substantially: the AMD chip provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip provides 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel part uses a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake, though the database does not break down performance-core versus efficiency-core counts. The AMD chip's 12 threads from 6 cores indicate simultaneous multithreading on all cores.

Cache hierarchies diverge in size and organization. The AMD chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 4 MB L3. The Intel chip also has 80 KB L1 per core but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core and provides 24 MB of shared L3, six times the AMD chip's L3 capacity. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part likely benefits workloads with significant data reuse.

Memory support differs: the AMD chip supports DDR5 only with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and no bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is supported on the AMD chip but not on the Intel chip.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 10 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe Gen 5 standard on the Intel part offers higher per-lane bandwidth, though with fewer total lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The database does not include graphics benchmarks for either part.

Socket and market segment differ fundamentally. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5 and targets the desktop market, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1744 and targets the mobile market. This means the AMD part is socketed and replaceable, while the Intel part is soldered to the motherboard. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the Intel chip's multiplier is locked.

Release dates differ by over a year: the AMD chip launched on 2026-02-28, while the Intel chip launched on 2024-12-17. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $502, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

# FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, giving the Intel chip 8 additional cores and 8 additional threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G boosts to 4.50 GHz, a difference of 0.90 GHz in favor of Intel.

Q: What manufacturing processes do the two chips use?

A: The AMD chip uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm Intel process.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 250H does not.

Q: What are the market segments for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G is a desktop processor using AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core 7 250H is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1744.

Q: How does the L3 cache differ between the two?

A: The AMD chip has 4 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, six times the AMD chip's capacity.

# The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 250H has recorded benchmark results showing an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35,728. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, placing it in a competitive performance tier. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, which prevents any quantitative performance conclusion.

For workloads requiring extensive parallel processing, the Intel chip's 14 cores, 20 threads, and 24 MB shared L3 cache provide a structural advantage over the AMD chip's 6 cores, 12 threads, and 4 MB L3. The Intel chip's 5.40 GHz boost clock also favors single-threaded responsiveness. The AMD chip counters with a more advanced 4 nm process, ECC memory support, an unlocked multiplier, and a desktop socket that allows CPU replacement.

The market segments are distinct: desktop versus mobile. Users building a desktop system with AMD Socket AM5 would choose the AMD part, while mobile laptop integration requires the Intel BGA 1744 part. The Intel chip's launch MSRP of $502 provides a reference point for its positioning. The AMD chip's higher 65 W TDP versus 45 W for Intel suggests different power delivery requirements.

# Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G | Intel Core 7 250H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-H |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-12-17 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $502 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. Both processors use dual-channel memory buses. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 35,728 and 85th percentile rank stand against the AMD chip's score of 0 and 50th percentile rank, though the AMD chip lacks any recorded benchmark measurements.