AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T uses 2 cores and 4 threads. This gives the AMD part a 3x advantage in both core and thread counts.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 sits in the 80th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Processor 300T ranks in the 50th percentile. The AMD part places higher overall in the recorded benchmark distribution.

Q: What process node does each chip use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Processor 300T uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip also has a smaller die footprint, though the exact die size for the AMD part is not recorded.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300T does not. Both support dual-channel memory, with the AMD part supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and the Intel part supporting DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 watts. The AMD chip draws less power despite having three times the core count.

Q: How does PCIe support differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Processor 300T provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation and two additional lanes.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Processor 300T represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD chip uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-S codename. The process nodes diverge sharply: AMD fabricates at 4 nm through TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry. The Intel die size is recorded at 163 mm², while no die size is listed for the AMD part.

Core topology differs substantially. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. Cache hierarchies also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 4 MB of L3, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip holds more total L3 despite having fewer cores.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with no ECC support and no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The AMD chip is a mobile segment part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip is a desktop segment part on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the Intel base clock is 3.40 GHz with no boost clock recorded. The TDPs are 28 watts for AMD and 35 watts for Intel. Both are production active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, Intel uses the UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part was released in January 2026, while the Intel part was released in January 2024.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries comparing these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of zero. The head-to-head wins are zero for both sides. However, the AMD part's available scores can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish a performance context.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 delivers an average benchmark score of 28128, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13490F with an average score of 28185, a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the AMD part trails that rival by a narrow 0.2 percent. The next nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14500T with an average score of 28065, where the AMD part leads by 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054, with the AMD part leading by 0.3 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28032, with the AMD part leading by 0.3 percent. These deltas show the AMD chip sitting in a tight cluster around the 28000 to 28200 mark, effectively within a fraction of a percent of four established mid-range parts.

The recorded Cinebench scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 show a multi-core score of 11333 in Cinebench R23 and 1686 in Cinebench R15, with single-core scores of 1816 and 260 respectively. The PassMark results cover a wide range of workloads: multi-thread score of 19000, single-thread score of 3734, integer math at 61026, floating-point math at 40627, extended instructions at 16197, data encryption at 11110, data compression at 225374, random string sorting at 24891, prime number finding at 58, and physics at 1075.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct numerical comparison can be made. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates it sits near the median of all CPUs, while the AMD part sits at the 80th percentile. The Intel part's average benchmark score of zero reflects the absence of recorded data rather than actual performance. The lack of head-to-head entries means the only quantitative comparison available is the percentile gap and the AMD part's rivalry data.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 offers 6 cores and 12 threads, a 4 nm process, a 4.50 GHz boost clock, 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, ECC support, and a 28-watt TDP. It ranks in the 80th percentile of all CPUs and produces an average benchmark score of 28128, placing it within 0.3 percent of four mid-range rivals. The Intel Processor 300T offers 2 cores and 4 threads, a 10 nm process, a 3.40 GHz base clock with no boost clock recorded, DDR4 and DDR5 support without ECC, and a 35-watt TDP. It ranks in the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores.

Users working with multi-threaded workloads should favor the AMD part based on the core and thread counts, the higher percentile ranking, and the recorded multi-core Cinebench scores. Users building a desktop system with PCIe Gen 5 support should favor the Intel part, which offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes compared to the AMD part's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory, which may matter for systems reusing older memory modules. The AMD part is the only one of the two with ECC support, a meaningful distinction for error-sensitive environments. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $82, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The AMD part is the stronger overall performer according to the database, but the Intel part holds specific advantages in PCIe generation, lane count, and DDR4 compatibility. The choice depends entirely on which of those factors matters more for a given workload.

Specification Differences

Cores: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores, Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores.

Threads: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 12 threads, Intel Processor 300T has 4 threads.

Base Clock: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel Processor 300T runs at 3.40 GHz.

Boost Clock: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 boosts to 4.50 GHz, Intel Processor 300T has no recorded boost clock.

TDP: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is rated at 28 watts, Intel Processor 300T at 35 watts.

Socket: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel Processor 300T uses Intel Socket 1700.

Architecture: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Zen 5, Intel Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake.

Codename: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is Gorgon Point, Intel Processor 300T is Raptor Lake-S.

Generation: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel Processor 300T is Intel Processor (Raptor Lake).

Process Node: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses 4 nm, Intel Processor 300T uses 10 nm.

Foundry: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses TSMC, Intel Processor 300T uses Intel.

Die Size: Intel Processor 300T is 163 mm², AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has no recorded die size.

L2 Cache: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 1 MB per core, Intel Processor 300T has 1.25 MB per core.

L3 Cache: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 4 MB, Intel Processor 300T has 6 MB shared.

Memory Support: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory Bandwidth: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 records 89.6 GB/s, Intel Processor 300T has no recorded bandwidth.

ECC Memory: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports ECC, Intel Processor 300T does not.

PCIe: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel Processor 300T uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated Graphics: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Radeon 840M, Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710.

Market Segment: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is mobile, Intel Processor 300T is desktop.

Release Date: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 released in January 2026, Intel Processor 300T released in January 2024.

Part Number: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is 100-000001337, Intel Processor 300T is SRN3K.

Percentile: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 sits at the 80th percentile, Intel Processor 300T at the 50th percentile.