AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 holds every recorded benchmark win in this comparison, though the Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark entries in the database. The AMD part delivers a 6-core, 12-thread configuration against a 2-core, 4-thread Intel part, which explains the multicore dominance. The AMD chip records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11333 and a single-core score of 1816, while the Intel part has no recorded scores to compare directly. In the PassMark suite, the AMD chip posts a multithread score of 19000 and a single-thread score of 3734. The Intel Processor 300, by contrast, has zero benchmark scores listed, so the data shows no use case where the Intel part wins a recorded test.

The AMD part also carries a higher percentile ranking at 80 versus the Intel part's 50, placing it above a larger share of all CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score for the AMD chip is 28128, while the Intel chip shows 0. The AMD chip wins across every workload category where data exists: integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number searching, random string sorting, and physics simulation. The Intel Processor 300 cannot claim a win in any measured category because no measurements exist for it.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers, nodes, and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, part of the Gorgon Point codename within the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with the Raptor Lake-S codename. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads; the Intel chip has 2 cores and 4 threads. Core counts alone explain a large portion of the performance gap.

Cache configurations differ substantially. Both chips list 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Despite the Intel part having more L3 cache per core, the AMD part has more total cache across its six cores. The base clocks also differ: the AMD chip runs at 2.00 GHz with a 4.50 GHz boost, while the Intel chip runs at 3.90 GHz with no boost clock listed. The Intel chip has a higher base clock, but the AMD chip boosts significantly higher.

Process node differences are stark: 4 nm versus 10 nm. The AMD chip is built by TSMC, the Intel chip by Intel. Die size is only listed for the Intel part at 163 mm². Memory support differs as well: the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode with no bandwidth figure listed. The AMD chip supports ECC memory; the Intel chip does not. PCIe lanes differ: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 14 CPU-only lanes, the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The AMD chip integrates Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel chip integrates UHD Graphics 710. The AMD chip is a mobile part on Socket FP8, the Intel chip is a desktop part on Socket 1700. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, the Intel chip has a TDP of 46 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, so direct comparisons rely on the AMD chip's recorded scores and the Intel chip's absence of scores. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11333 and a single-core score of 1816. Cinebench R15 results show 1686 multicore and 260 single-core. In PassMark tests, the AMD chip records 61026 in integer math, 40627 in floating point math, 225374 in data compression, 11110 in data encryption, 16197 in extended instructions, 58 in prime number searching, 24891 in random string sorting, and 1075 in physics. The multithread score is 19000, and the single-thread score is 3734.

Since the Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark scores, the data cannot show a single head-to-head margin. The AMD part sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part's average benchmark score of 28128 places it near several rivals: the Intel Core i5-13490F averages 28185 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-14500T averages 28065 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE averages 28054 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G averages 28032 (0.3% lower). This puts the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 in a tight cluster with those four desktop and mobile parts, all within a 0.5% band of average scores.

The Intel Processor 300 has no nearest rivals listed, which underscores the lack of benchmark data. The AMD chip's 6 cores and 12 threads provide a clear structural advantage over the Intel chip's 2 cores and 4 threads in any multithreaded workload, but the absence of Intel scores prevents quantifying that advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Processor 300, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 15 recorded scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the AMD chip compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 averages 28128, which is 0.2% below the Intel Core i5-13490F (28185), 0.2% above the Intel Core i5-14500T (28065), 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054), and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28032).

Q: What are the cache differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports ECC memory; the Intel Processor 300 does not.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory and no bandwidth figure listed.

The Verdict

The data points clearly toward the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 for any workload that benefits from additional cores, threads, or higher boost clocks. The AMD chip has three times the cores and three times the threads of the Intel Processor 300, a 4.50 GHz boost clock versus no listed boost clock, and a 4 nm process node versus 10 nm. The AMD chip also has a higher percentile ranking (80 versus 50) and a substantial average benchmark score of 28128 against 0 for the Intel part.

The Intel Processor 300 does have advantages in the recorded specifications: a higher base clock at 3.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, more L3 cache at 6 MB versus 4 MB, more L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 14 lanes, and a lower launch MSRP of $82 versus no listed MSRP for the AMD chip. However, no benchmark scores exist for the Intel part, so the data cannot confirm whether those specifications translate into any performance win.

The AMD chip targets the mobile segment with a 28 watt TDP and Socket FP8, while the Intel chip targets the desktop segment with a 46 watt TDP and Socket 1700. The AMD chip uses Zen 5 architecture with integrated Radeon 840M graphics; the Intel chip uses Raptor Lake with UHD Graphics 710. For users selecting strictly on recorded performance data, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is the only processor with measurable results, and those results place it near the top quarter of all CPUs. The Intel Processor 300 remains an unmeasured part in the database, so any performance claim for it would lack supporting evidence.

The AMD chip's nearest rivals all sit within a 0.5% band of its average score, which indicates consistent performance around the 28128 mark. The Intel chip has no rival data at all. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 delivers all recorded performance, while the Intel Processor 300 offers only specifications.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 | Intel Processor 300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 12 | 4 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | None listed |

| TDP | 28 watts | 46 watts |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | None listed | 163 mm² |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None listed |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production status | Active | Active |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $82 |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Part number | 100-000001337 | SRN3J |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 80 | 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 28128 | 0 |