AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 266V Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 7 266V

CORE STATE Lunar Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 17W
ARCHITECTURE Lunar Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,686
1,667
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
260
235
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
11,333
16,544
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,816
2,335
passmark_data_compression
225,374
187,050
passmark_data_encryption
11,110
13,822
passmark_extended_instructions
16,197
15,928
passmark_find_prime_numbers
58
191
passmark_floating_point_math
40,627
56,923
passmark_integer_math
61,026
41,558
passmark_multithread
19,000
19,461
passmark_physics
1,075
1,608
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,891
22,905
passmark_single_thread
3,734
3,943
passmark_singlethread
3,734
3,943
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
6,948
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
980

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits this pairing into two distinct personalities. Intel Core Ultra 7 266V takes the majority of wins, 9 out of 15 head-to-head tests, but AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores the most decisive victories. The largest margin belongs to AMD in integer math, where it posts 61026 against Intel's 41558, a 46.8% advantage. This is not a marginal difference; it is a dominant showing in a workload that reflects general arithmetic processing.

The Cinebench results tell a more complex story. In Cinebench R15 multicore, AMD edges ahead with 1686 versus 1667, a 1.1% lead. The single-core R15 test favors AMD more clearly, 260 to 235, a 10.6% gap. However, the newer Cinebench R23 tests reverse the outcome sharply. Intel delivers 16544 in multicore versus AMD's 11333, a 31.5% deficit for AMD. In R23 single-core, Intel leads 2335 to 1816, a 22.2% margin. The R15 and R23 versions measure different instruction mixes, and the data indicates Intel scales better under the R23 workload structure.

PassMark tests reveal further separation. AMD wins data compression by 20.5%, scoring 225374 against 187050. AMD also takes extended instructions, 16197 versus 15928, a 1.7% edge, and random string sorting, 24891 versus 22905, an 8.7% win. Intel counters in data encryption, 13822 versus 11110, a 19.6% lead. The prime number search is Intel's largest single win: 191 versus 58, a 69.6% advantage. Floating point math goes to Intel, 56923 versus 40627, a 28.6% margin. Intel also wins physics simulation, 1608 versus 1075, a 33.1% lead.

The aggregate metrics favor Intel narrowly. PassMark multithread shows 19461 for Intel versus 19000 for AMD, a 2.4% edge. Single-thread results give Intel 3943 versus 3734, a 5.3% lead. The overall average benchmark score places AMD at 28128 and Intel at 23297, but that figure is skewed by AMD's inclusion of additional benchmark entries. The percentile ranking against all CPUs puts AMD at 80 and Intel at 76. AMD's nearest rivals include Intel Core i5-13490F at 28185, a 0.2% delta, and Intel Core i5-14500T at 28065, a 0.2% delta. Intel's nearest rivals include AMD Ryzen 7 5800H at 23277, a 0.1% delta, and Intel Core Ultra 9 288V at 23219, a 0.3% delta.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel Core Ultra 7 266V uses Lunar Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. Both use TSMC manufacturing, but AMD is on a 4 nm node while Intel is on 3 nm.

Core counts differ structurally. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. Intel provides 8 cores and 8 threads, with no multithreading. The thread count parity, 12 versus 8, gives AMD more logical processors, yet Intel still wins most multithreaded benchmarks. This indicates Intel's per-core efficiency compensates for fewer threads.

Cache layouts diverge significantly. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. Intel allocates 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Intel's L3 is three times larger, which explains its strength in workloads that benefit from large shared caches, such as the prime number search and floating point math. AMD's smaller L3 still delivers wins in integer math and data compression, suggesting those workloads rely more on per-core cache and raw ALU throughput.

Memory bandwidth also favors Intel. AMD records 89.6 GB/s, while Intel reaches 136.5 GB/s, a 52.4% higher figure. Both support dual-channel memory, but Intel uses LPDDR5X with motherboard-dependent support, while AMD supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. AMD supports ECC memory; Intel does not. PCIe capabilities favor AMD with Gen 4 and 14 CPU lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 but only 4 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses Arc 140V. The benchmark data does not include graphics tests, so the comparison must stay with CPU-focused results. Power envelopes are distinct: AMD has a 28 TDP, Intel a 17 TDP. Intel achieves higher benchmark scores despite a lower thermal budget, which points to the 3 nm node and the Lunar Lake efficiency design.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by workload type. Intel Core Ultra 7 266V is the stronger processor for sustained compute tasks, particularly those involving floating point, physics simulation, prime number generation, and the Cinebench R23 suite. Its 31.5% multicore R23 lead and 28.6% floating point lead are substantial. The 69.6% prime number advantage is the single largest margin in the entire comparison. For users running rendering, scientific calculations, or simulation workloads, Intel is the choice.

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins where integer arithmetic and data manipulation dominate. The 46.8% integer math lead and 20.5% data compression lead are decisive. AMD also holds a 10.6% edge in Cinebench R15 single-core and a 1.1% lead in R15 multicore. For workloads such as database operations, compression pipelines, and general integer-heavy processing, AMD delivers better results.

The overall average benchmark scores place AMD at 28128, which is 20.7% higher than Intel's 23297, but this aggregate is not a reliable verdict because it includes AMD's Cinebench R15 results and Intel's R20 results without complete overlap. The head-to-head win count, 9 for Intel and 6 for AMD, favors Intel in breadth. However, AMD's wins are often larger in magnitude. The percentile ranking, 80 versus 76, places AMD slightly higher among all CPUs, but that metric includes the full benchmark set and does not isolate the head-to-head tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: Intel Core Ultra 7 266V wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests, while AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins 6.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark margin between the two?

A: In PassMark find prime numbers, Intel scores 191 against AMD's 58, a 69.6% advantage. AMD's largest win is integer math at 46.8% ahead.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: Intel scores 16544 versus AMD's 11333, giving Intel a 31.5% lead. This is the biggest multicore gap in the data.

Q: Does AMD or Intel have more threads?

A: AMD has 12 threads from 6 cores, while Intel has 8 threads from 8 cores. AMD has more logical processors, but Intel wins most multithreaded tests.

Q: Which CPU has a higher single-thread PassMark score?

A: Intel leads with 3943 versus AMD's 3734, a 5.3% margin. Intel also leads Cinebench R23 single-core by 22.2%.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: Intel supports 136.5 GB/s, while AMD supports 89.6 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory, but Intel's bandwidth is higher.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in integer math, data compression, random string sorting, extended instructions, and the older Cinebench R15 tests. The integer math result, 61026 versus 41558, shows AMD's ALU throughput is significantly stronger. Data compression, 225374 versus 187050, indicates AMD handles repeated data rearrangement more efficiently. Random string sorting, 24891 versus 22905, reinforces the pattern of AMD winning tasks that involve pointer chasing and data movement. Extended instructions, 16197 versus 15928, is a narrow but consistent win. The R15 single-core lead, 10.6%, and R15 multicore lead, 1.1%, suggest AMD performs well in legacy benchmark conditions.

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V wins in Cinebench R23 multicore and single-core, PassMark physics, floating point math, prime number finding, data encryption, multithread, and single-thread tests. The R23 multicore result, 31.5% ahead, and the R23 single-core result, 22.2% ahead, indicate Intel's architecture handles modern rendering workloads better. Physics simulation, 1608 versus 1075, a 33.1% lead, points to stronger compute in constrained environments. Floating point math, 56923 versus 40627, shows Intel's FP units are more capable. Prime number finding, 69.6% ahead, suggests Intel's branch prediction and modular arithmetic are superior. Data encryption, 19.6% ahead, benefits from Intel's cryptographic instruction set. The multithread and single-thread PassMark wins, 2.4% and 5.3% respectively, give Intel the overall aggregate edge in the PassMark suite.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 | Intel Core Ultra 7 266V |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 17 W |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 136.5 GB/s |

| ECC support | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 5, 4 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | Arc 140V |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-09-23 |

AMD offers more threads, ECC support, and more PCIe lanes. Intel offers a smaller process node, higher clocks, a lower TDP, more cache at every level, and substantially higher memory bandwidth. The release dates show AMD launched over a year later than Intel, yet its benchmark wins are concentrated in integer and data tasks rather than modern rendering workloads. The socket difference confirms these are not interchangeable platforms; motherboard selection must match the respective socket.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 435
Ultra 7 266V
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
8 -33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.2 +10.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5 +11.1%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.2 +10.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5 +11.1%
Multiplier
20
22 +10.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
17 -39.3%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Lunar Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Lunar Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ultra 7 (Lunar Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
LPDDR5X Depends on motherboard
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
136.5 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel BGA 2833
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 4 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 48 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
Arc 140V
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001337
SRPMMSRPMY
Package
FP8
FC-BGAEXX
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 435 Details View Core Ultra 7 266V Details