AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive victory for the Intel Core i7-14700HX across every recorded test. The Intel processor wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons, with the largest margins appearing in heavily multithreaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 24,595 against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435's 11,333, a delta of -53.9% in favor of Intel. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test tells a similar story: Intel scores 3,812 versus AMD's 1,686, a -55.8% difference. These are substantial gaps that indicate a significant core-count and thread-count advantage.

The single-core results are closer but still favor Intel. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 2,103 against AMD's 1,816, a -13.6% delta. Cinebench R15 single-core shows Intel at 296 versus AMD's 260, a -12.2% gap. PassMark single-thread results narrow the margin further: Intel scores 3,947 against AMD's 3,734, a -5.4% difference. This suggests the AMD Zen 5 architecture is competitive on a per-thread basis, though it cannot match Intel's peak clock speed.

The PassMark suite reveals where the Intel chip's extra cores matter most. Data compression scores show Intel at 438,539 versus AMD's 225,374, a -48.6% delta. Data encryption shows Intel at 26,092 against AMD's 11,110, a -57.4% gap. Floating point math favors Intel at 93,836 versus 40,627, a -56.7% difference. Integer math follows the same pattern: Intel scores 131,296, AMD scores 61,026, a -53.5% delta. Find prime numbers is the most lopsided test: Intel at 165 versus AMD's 58, a -64.8% difference.

The multithread score from PassMark confirms the overall trend. Intel posts 36,566, while AMD manages 19,000, a -48% delta. Physics simulation also favors Intel heavily: 2,252 versus 1,075, a -52.3% difference. Random string sorting shows Intel at 48,544 against AMD's 24,891, a -48.7% gap. Extended instruction workloads give Intel a 25,718 to 16,197 win, a -37% delta.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14700HX wins in every single workload category. There are no benchmark tests in the database where the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 posts a higher score. The closest competition appears in single-threaded tasks, where the AMD part trails by only 5.4% in PassMark single-thread performance. This suggests the Zen 5 architecture has strong per-core efficiency, but the Intel chip's higher boost clock (5.50 GHz versus 4.50 GHz) and larger core count still carry the day.

The Intel processor's advantage grows with thread count. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the gap is 53.9%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it is 55.8%. These numbers indicate the Intel part's 20 cores and 28 threads provide a massive scaling advantage over AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads in heavily parallel workloads. For content creation, compilation, or any task that uses many threads, the Intel chip dominates.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 does show respectable single-core performance relative to its core count. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,816 is only 13.6% behind Intel's 2,103. In PassMark single-thread, the gap narrows to 5.4%. This indicates the Zen 5 architecture is efficient per clock, but the Intel chip's clock advantage and larger thread pool make it the better all-around performer in every measured scenario.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with the Gorgon Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation. The Intel Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, with the Raptor Lake-HX codename and a 257 mm² die size.

Core and thread counts differ dramatically. AMD offers 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel offers 20 cores and 28 threads. This explains the large multi-core performance gap. Cache configurations also differ: AMD provides 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of L3 cache. Intel also provides 80 KB of L1 per core, but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core and offers 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support varies. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, though its bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD includes the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1964. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 55 W TDP. The Intel multiplier is unlocked, while AMD's is not. Release dates also differ: the AMD part released in January 2026, the Intel part in January 2024.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 2,103 versus AMD's 1,816, a 13.6% gap. In PassMark single-thread, Intel scores 3,947 versus 3,734, a 5.4% gap.

Q: Which processor has higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX boosts to 5.50 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: How do the TDP ratings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core i7-14700HX has a 55 W TDP.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Core i7-14700HX support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 4 MB of L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core i7-14700HX is the stronger processor in every measured workload. Its 20-core, 28-thread configuration delivers more than double the multi-core performance of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 in Cinebench R23 and R15 tests. The Intel chip also leads in single-core tests, though by a smaller margin. For users who need maximum throughput in multithreaded applications, the Intel processor is the obvious choice.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has its merits. Its 28 W TDP suggests better power efficiency, and its Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm node brings modern design. Its single-thread performance is competitive, trailing Intel by only 5.4% in PassMark. However, the AMD chip cannot match Intel's core count or overall benchmark scores. The database shows the Intel chip ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits in the 80th percentile.

The average benchmark score tells the story: Intel averages 45,953, AMD averages 28,128. The Intel chip's nearest rivals include AMD EPYC server processors and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, all with similar average scores. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435's nearest rivals are mid-range desktop and mobile chips with comparable scores. The Intel Core i7-14700HX is in a higher performance tier entirely.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 | Intel Core i7-14700HX |

|----------------|--------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 20 |

| Threads | 12 | 28 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 55 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Release Date | January 2026 | January 2024 |