AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Core i5-14500T are two processors that land within 0.2% of each other in average benchmark score, yet they achieve that parity through very different means. The AMD chip is a 6-core mobile part with a 28W TDP, while the Intel chip is a 14-core desktop processor with a 35W TDP. The data shows Intel winning 13 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, but the AMD chip takes the single-core crown in one legacy test and nearly matches Intel in another. Both processors sit at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, making them direct competitors despite their architectural and physical differences.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14500T dominates the multi-threaded workloads, and the margin is often substantial. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 2022 against AMD’s 1686, a 16.6% advantage. The gap narrows considerably in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where Intel leads 11790 to 11333, a 3.9% difference. PassMark’s multi-thread test shows Intel ahead by 17.1% (22910 vs 19000), and the floating-point math test reveals the largest single delta: Intel scores 58869 versus 40627, a 31% lead. Integer math follows a similar pattern, with Intel at 80922 compared to AMD’s 61026, a 24.6% advantage. Data encryption is another clear Intel win, 15410 vs 11110, a 27.9% gap. Even in the find-prime-numbers test, Intel wins by 28.4% (81 vs 58).

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435’s wins are narrower but notable. In Cinebench R15 single-core, AMD scores 260 versus Intel’s 252, a 3.2% victory. In PassMark’s extended instructions test, AMD edges out Intel 16197 to 16043, a 1% margin. The single-thread scores are essentially a tie: Intel leads 3736 to 3734 in PassMark single-thread, a 0.1% difference that is statistically negligible. The Cinebench R23 single-core result also favors Intel, but only by 1.2% (1838 vs 1816). This suggests AMD’s Zen 5 architecture delivers competitive per-thread performance, but Intel’s higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus AMD’s 4.50 GHz helps it secure the top spot in most single-thread tests.

Other workloads show Intel’s breadth. Data compression favors Intel 262417 to 225374, a 14.1% lead. Random string sorting goes to Intel 28462 to 24891, a 12.5% margin. Physics simulation is an Intel win at 1288 vs 1075, a 16.5% gap. The overall average benchmark scores are nearly identical—AMD at 28128 and Intel at 28065—which places them within 0.2% of each other, confirming that while Intel wins more individual tests, AMD’s efficiency and single-core strength keep the aggregate score competitive.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 11790, which is 3.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435’s 11333.

Q: Is the AMD chip faster in any single-threaded benchmark?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R15 single-core, AMD scores 260 against Intel’s 252, a 3.2% advantage. In PassMark single-thread, the two are effectively tied, with Intel leading by only 0.1% (3736 vs 3734).

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The AMD chip has a 28W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 35W TDP.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Core i5-14500T support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is built on TSMC’s 4nm process node and uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14500T, by contrast, uses Intel’s 10nm process node and the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R from the Core 14th Gen family. The process node difference is significant: AMD’s 4nm TSMC process is denser than Intel’s 10nm node, which helps explain the AMD chip’s lower 28W TDP despite similar performance levels.

Cache configurations differ markedly. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a small 4 MB L3 cache. Intel’s L1 is also 80 KB per core, but its L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 is a shared 24 MB. That six-fold difference in L3 cache is a major reason Intel wins in data-heavy workloads like compression and encryption. The Intel chip’s die size is 215 mm², while the AMD die size is not specified, but the 4nm process likely keeps it smaller.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not listed. Both support ECC memory. The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The sockets are incompatible—AMD uses Socket FP8 (mobile), while Intel uses Socket 1700 (desktop). Intel’s PCIe implementation is newer (Gen 5 with 16 lanes) versus AMD’s Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on workload type. The Intel Core i5-14500T is the stronger all-around performer in multi-threaded applications, winning 13 of 15 head-to-head tests. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a substantial advantage in rendering, math-heavy tasks, and data compression, with margins ranging from 3.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core to 31% in floating-point math. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, however, offers a more efficient package with a 28W TDP and a 4nm process, making it a better fit for power-constrained or mobile environments. Its single-core performance is competitive, winning one test and tying another, which means it will not feel slow in everyday tasks.

The average benchmark scores are nearly identical (28128 for AMD, 28065 for Intel), so neither processor is a clear winner in aggregate. The Intel chip’s higher boost clock (4.80 GHz vs 4.50 GHz) and larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 4 MB) drive its multi-threaded wins. The AMD chip’s victory in Cinebench R15 single-core and its near-tie in PassMark single-thread show that Zen 5’s IPC is strong, but the core count disadvantage limits its multi-threaded ceiling. For users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, the Intel chip is the obvious choice. For users who prioritize lower power consumption and a smaller footprint, the AMD chip is the better option.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 | Intel Core i5-14500T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28W | 35W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not specified |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $232 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in every multi-threaded benchmark category that matters for content creation and heavy computation. Cinebench R23 multi-core (11790 vs 11333) shows a modest but real advantage in rendering. PassMark floating-point math (58869 vs 40627) and integer math (80922 vs 61026) reveal massive leads in scientific and financial workloads. Data encryption (15410 vs 11110) and compression (262417 vs 225374) are Intel domains, making it the pick for database work or file archiving. The 24 MB L3 cache is the likely driver here, providing more room for working sets.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in Cinebench R15 single-core (260 vs 252) and extended instructions (16197 vs 16043). These wins suggest that for legacy single-threaded applications or code that leverages newer instruction sets, the AMD chip holds its own. The near-tie in PassMark single-thread (3734 vs 3736) means everyday responsiveness will feel similar. The AMD chip’s lower 28W TDP and 4nm process make it the efficiency winner, suitable for thin-and-light laptops or fanless designs. Its mobile socket (FP8) and LPDDR5X support also point to portable platforms. The Intel chip, with its desktop socket 1700 and PCIe Gen 5, is better suited for a fixed workstation where power draw is less critical.