AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Core 7 350 are two mobile processors aimed at different priorities, and the benchmark data reveals a sharp split between multi-threaded workloads and single-thread responsiveness. The AMD part wins 8 of the 15 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Intel part takes 7, but the margins tell a more interesting story than the win count alone.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive results come from multi-core and integer-heavy workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 11333 against the Intel Core 7 350's 8030, a 41.1% advantage. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a similar gap: 1686 versus 1220, a 38.2% lead for AMD. These are not close calls; the AMD processor delivers substantially higher throughput when all cores are engaged.

The PassMark integer math test produces the largest delta in the entire dataset. The Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 61026, while the Intel Core 7 350 manages 33734, an 80.9% difference. This suggests the AMD design is particularly efficient at handling arithmetic-heavy instruction streams, likely benefiting from its simultaneous multi-threading capability across all 6 cores.

Data compression and sorting also favor AMD heavily. The Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 225374 in PassMark data compression versus 143123 for Intel, a 57.5% margin. Random string sorting shows a 44.4% gap, with AMD at 24891 and Intel at 17238. Extended instruction workloads follow the same pattern: AMD scores 16197 against Intel's 12045, a 34.5% advantage.

The multi-thread PassMark result confirms the trend. AMD reaches 19000, Intel reaches 15170, a 25.2% difference. Data encryption is nearly a tie, with AMD at 11110 and Intel at 10933, a slim 1.6% edge for AMD.

The Intel Core 7 350 fights back in single-core and physics-oriented tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 2046 versus AMD's 1816, an 11.2% advantage. The R15 single-core test shows an 11% gap in Intel's favor, 292 versus 260. PassMark single-thread scores 4100 for Intel and 3734 for AMD, an 8.9% lead.

The prime number finding test is the most striking single-core outlier. Intel scores 107, AMD scores 58, a 45.8% difference. This workload appears to favor Intel's architecture disproportionately, possibly due to its higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz compared to AMD's 4.50 GHz. Floating-point math also tips to Intel, 42809 versus 40627, a 5.1% margin. Physics simulation follows suit: 1173 for Intel, 1075 for AMD, an 8.4% edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core Cinebench score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 11333 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 41.1% higher than the Intel Core 7 350's 8030.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark gap between the two?

A: The PassMark integer math test shows the biggest difference, with AMD scoring 61026 against Intel's 33734, an 80.9% delta.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 350 win any benchmark by a wide margin?

A: Yes, the PassMark find prime numbers test favors Intel by 45.8%, with a score of 107 versus AMD's 58. Intel also leads single-core Cinebench tests by roughly 11%.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has an average benchmark score of 28128, while the Intel Core 7 350 averages 17779. AMD's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13490F, averages 28185, a 0.2% difference.

Q: Which processor ranks higher against all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 sits in the 80th percentile, while the Intel Core 7 350 sits in the 71st percentile.

Q: Are there any benchmark categories where the two are nearly identical?

A: PassMark data encryption is the closest contest, with AMD at 11110 and Intel at 10933, a 1.6% difference.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is the stronger choice for multi-threaded productivity. Its 41.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 80.9% lead in integer math point to clear advantages in compilation, rendering, and data processing. The Intel Core 7 350, meanwhile, delivers superior single-core performance in Cinebench and PassMark tests, making it the better fit for lightly threaded applications and tasks that depend on raw clock speed.

The average benchmark score gap is decisive: 28128 for AMD versus 17779 for Intel. That 58.3% difference in overall throughput reflects AMD's 12 threads versus Intel's 6 threads, a structural advantage that shows up consistently across multi-core workloads. However, the Intel part holds its own in single-thread tests, and its 45.8% win in prime number finding suggests specialized integer workloads may favor Intel's architecture.

For users prioritizing parallel workloads, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is the data-backed choice. For users who need maximum single-thread responsiveness and can tolerate lower multi-core throughput, the Intel Core 7 350 has measurable advantages.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 4.50 GHz; Intel's base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost of 4.80 GHz. The thermal design power differs substantially: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 15 watts.

Cache layouts are also distinct. AMD provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 total. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory access differs at the bus level: AMD uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, Intel uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, but AMD also supports ECC memory while Intel does not.

PCIe lane counts vary, with AMD offering 14 Gen 4 lanes and Intel offering 6 Gen 4 lanes. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses BGA 1516. The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD featuring Radeon 840M and Intel featuring Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $469.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the Gorgon Point codename and a Ryzen AI 400 generation designation that includes both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, belongs to the Core 5 generation, and is built on Intel's 3 nm process. The foundry differs accordingly: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel.

The thread count difference stems from simultaneous multi-threading. AMD enables SMT, doubling its 6 cores to 12 threads. Intel does not, so its 6 cores yield 6 threads. This architectural choice explains the consistent multi-core gaps in the benchmark data. The cache hierarchy also reflects different design philosophies: Intel allocates more L1 and L2 per core, while AMD's smaller per-core caches are complemented by its memory bandwidth advantage.

The memory controllers diverge sharply. AMD's dual-channel interface delivers 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's single-channel interface delivers 59.7 GB/s. This 50% bandwidth difference likely contributes to AMD's strong performance in data compression and string sorting, workloads that benefit from memory throughput. Intel's higher boost clock, 4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, helps explain its single-core wins.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in scenarios that scale with thread count and memory bandwidth. Data compression, integer math, random string sorting, and extended instruction workloads all favor AMD by margins ranging from 34.5% to 80.9%. The Cinebench multi-core tests confirm this pattern, with AMD leading by roughly 38% to 41%. The 25.2% multi-thread PassMark result reinforces the conclusion that AMD is the better choice for heavily parallel tasks.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in single-thread-limited scenarios. Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core tests show an 11% advantage for Intel. PassMark single-thread shows an 8.9% lead. The prime number test, where Intel leads by 45.8%, and floating-point math, where Intel leads by 5.1%, suggest Intel's architecture handles certain integer and FP workloads more efficiently per thread. Physics simulation also favors Intel by 8.4%.

The overall split is clear: AMD dominates multi-threaded throughput, Intel dominates single-thread responsiveness. The 80th percentile ranking for AMD versus 71st for Intel indicates that, against the broader CPU landscape, AMD's overall performance profile sits higher. The Intel part's 15-watt TDP, however, makes it the more power-efficient option on paper, a factor that may matter in thermally constrained mobile designs.