AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core 3 N350 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Core 3 N350 occupy different tiers of the mobile processor market, and the benchmark data reflects that gap clearly. The AMD part, built on the Zen 5 architecture, delivers substantially higher scores across every recorded workload, while the Intel chip, based on the Twin Lake architecture, posts significantly lower numbers but operates at a much lower power envelope. This analysis breaks down the recorded performance differences, architecture decisions, and what the data suggests about each processor's intended role.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons recorded in the database, with no wins for the Intel Core 3 N350. The margin of victory varies by workload, but the pattern is consistent: AMD leads by a wide margin in every category.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD part scores 11,333 against Intel's 6,274, a delta of 80.6%. The single-core R23 result shows an even larger gap: AMD scores 1,816 versus Intel's 885, a 105.2% advantage. The older Cinebench R15 tests show even more extreme differences, with AMD leading multi-core by 166.8% (1,686 vs. 632) and single-core by 192.1% (260 vs. 89). These results indicate that the AMD processor's per-core performance advantage is substantial, not just its multi-threaded throughput.

PassMark's integer math test shows AMD at 61,026 versus Intel's 27,669, a 120.6% lead. Floating-point math follows a similar pattern: AMD scores 40,627 against Intel's 17,781, a 128.5% difference. The extended instructions test delivers the largest disparity in the entire dataset: AMD scores 16,197 versus Intel's 3,981, a 306.9% lead. This suggests AMD's SIMD and vector processing capabilities are dramatically stronger, likely reflecting the newer Zen 5 microarchitecture's wider execution resources.

Data compression shows AMD at 225,374 versus Intel's 80,444, a 180.2% delta. Data encryption results are closer in relative terms but still heavily favor AMD: 11,110 vs. 5,693, a 95.2% advantage. The find prime numbers test shows AMD at 58 versus Intel's 20, a 190% lead. Random string sorting favors AMD by 146.4% (24,891 vs. 10,102), and the physics test shows AMD ahead by 141% (1,075 vs. 446). The PassMark multi-thread score is 19,000 for AMD versus 7,382 for Intel, a 157.4% delta. Single-thread performance, measured twice in the database, shows AMD at 3,734 versus Intel's 1,974, an 89.2% lead in both instances.

The average benchmark score in the database places AMD at 28,128, which sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 9,903, at the 66th percentile. The nearest rivals for AMD are the Intel Core i5-13490F (average 28,185, delta -0.2%), Intel Core i5-14500T (28,065, +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054, +0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032, +0.3%). For Intel, the nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-3770 (9,706, +2%), Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9,684, +2.3%), AMD EPYC 7F52 (10,159, -2.5%), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 (10,230, -3.2%). These rival comparisons confirm that AMD's average score is competitive with desktop-class processors, while Intel's is closer to older mobile and server parts from previous generations.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is the clear winner in every workload category. There is no single test where the Intel Core 3 N350 outperforms it. That said, the data does reveal where each processor's relative strengths lie, even if the absolute winner is always AMD.

The AMD part shows its largest relative advantages in extended instructions (306.9% ahead), Cinebench R15 single-core (192.1% ahead), and find prime numbers (190% ahead). These are workloads that benefit from high single-thread performance and advanced instruction set support. The smallest relative advantage for AMD is in data encryption (95.2% ahead) and Cinebench R23 multi-core (80.6% ahead), though these are still massive margins.

For the Intel Core 3 N350, the data shows no winning categories, but the relative performance profile is worth examining. Intel's smallest deficits come in data encryption (95.2% behind) and Cinebench R23 multi-core (80.6% behind), which are the workloads where the two processors are closest. This suggests that Intel's efficiency-oriented cores handle sustained multi-threaded loads relatively better than bursty single-threaded tasks, though the absolute performance gap remains prohibitive.

The database also shows that Intel's processor has a much lower TDP of 7 watts versus AMD's 28 watts. This is not a benchmark score, but it contextualizes the performance gap: Intel delivers its results at one-quarter the power draw, which points to different design goals. The AMD part is built for performance, while the Intel part appears optimized for energy efficiency in compact or fanless systems.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The core counts are notable: Intel has more physical cores, but AMD has simultaneous multithreading, which explains the 12 threads versus 8.

Cache layouts differ significantly. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a 4 MB shared L3. Intel allocates 96 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of shared L2, with a 6 MB shared L3. The L3 sizes are close (4 MB vs. 6 MB), but the L2 organization is different: AMD's per-core L2 provides faster access for each thread, while Intel's shared L2 may create contention. The L1 sizes are also close (80 KB vs. 96 KB per core), so the cache hierarchy alone does not explain the performance gap.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support. Intel supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 over a single-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s and no ECC support. The bandwidth difference is substantial: AMD has more than double the memory bandwidth of Intel, which directly impacts many of the benchmark workloads, especially data compression and encryption.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. AMD offers Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while Intel offers Gen 3 with 9 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The sockets are not compatible: AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses BGA 1264. The release dates in the database show Intel released on 2025-01-06, while AMD released on 2026-01-04, nearly a year later. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has 8 physical cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6. However, AMD supports 12 threads via simultaneous multithreading, while Intel supports only 8 threads. The core count advantage for Intel does not translate into benchmark wins.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: AMD scores 11,333 versus Intel's 6,274, which is an 80.6% advantage for AMD. This is one of the smaller deltas in the dataset, but still a decisive margin.

Q: Does the Intel processor have any benchmark where it wins?

A: No. The recorded head-to-head data shows 15 wins for AMD and 0 wins for Intel across all tested workloads.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: AMD records 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X bus. Intel records 38.4 GB/s over a single-channel DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5 bus. AMD has more than double the bandwidth.

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare?

A: AMD has an average score of 28,128, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Intel has an average of 9,903, placing it at the 66th percentile.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: AMD has a TDP of 28 watts, while Intel has a TDP of 7 watts. This indicates Intel's design targets much lower power consumption.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows a decisive performance hierarchy: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 outperforms the Intel Core 3 N350 in every recorded workload, with margins ranging from 80.6% to 306.9%. The AMD part's average score of 28,128 places it alongside desktop-class rivals like the Intel Core i5-13490F and Core i5-14500T, while Intel's average of 9,903 aligns with older processors like the Core i7-3770 and Core i5-1035G1.

The Intel Core 3 N350 is not a competitive alternative for users who prioritize raw performance. Its 8 cores and 6 MB of shared L3 cache do not compensate for the lack of multithreading, the single-channel memory bus at 38.4 GB/s, or the older 10 nm process. The 7 watt TDP is the primary differentiator: this is a processor designed for minimal power draw, likely in fanless or battery-critical systems, and the data reflects that trade-off.

For anyone selecting between these two based on benchmark results alone, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is the only choice. Its higher TDP and later release date suggest it targets thin-and-light laptops where performance matters, while the Intel part targets ultra-low-power devices where efficiency trumps speed. The database shows no scenario where the Intel processor's architecture advantages, such as its larger L3 cache or lower power ceiling, translate into a measurable performance win.