AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core benchmark score in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 11333 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 115.3% higher than the Intel Core 3 304's score of 5263.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 304 win any benchmark comparisons?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 3 304 wins two tests: Cinebench R15 single-core (264 vs 260, a 1.5% advantage) and PassMark find prime numbers (68 vs 58, a 14.7% advantage).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading.

Q: How do the processors compare in PassMark integer math performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 61026 in PassMark integer math, which is 147.7% higher than the Intel Core 3 304's score of 24640.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 3 304 has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher overall benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 ranks in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 3 304 ranks in the 68th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Core 3 304 represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD part uses Zen 5 architecture from the Gorgon Point codename family, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 304 uses Wildcat Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Core configuration differs significantly. The AMD processor provides 6 cores and 12 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The Intel processor provides 5 cores and 5 threads, with no multithreading capability. This partly explains the large multi-core performance gap.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 304 has 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip's larger total L3 cache does not compensate for its lower thread count in multi-threaded workloads.

Memory architecture differs substantially. The AMD processor supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor uses single-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not.

Both processors use PCIe Gen 4, but with different lane counts. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 provides 14 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 3 304 provides only 6 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel chip uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core.

The AMD processor fits AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1516. Both are mobile-market segments with active production status. The AMD release date is January 2026, and the Intel release date is April 2026. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a dominant performance profile for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 across most tests. The largest single advantage appears in PassMark integer math, where the AMD chip scores 61026 against 24640 for Intel, a 147.7% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a similar pattern: 11333 for AMD versus 5263 for Intel, a 115.3% advantage.

Cinebench R15 multi-core results give the AMD processor 1686 versus 849 for Intel, a 98.6% delta. PassMark data compression shows 225374 for AMD against 114775 for Intel, a 96.4% gap. PassMark random string sorting places AMD at 24891 and Intel at 13659, a 82.2% difference.

PassMark extended instructions favors AMD at 16197 versus 9686, a 67.2% delta. PassMark multithread results show 19000 for AMD and 11625 for Intel, a 63.4% advantage. PassMark floating point math gives AMD 40627 against 29722, a 36.7% lead. PassMark data encryption shows 11110 for AMD and 8501 for Intel, a 30.7% gap.

PassMark physics places AMD at 1075 versus 868, a 23.8% delta. Cinebench R23 single-core gives AMD 1816 against 1765, a 2.9% edge. PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests both show 3734 for AMD and 3614 for Intel, a 3.3% advantage.

The Intel Core 3 304 claims two wins. Cinebench R15 single-core gives Intel 264 versus 260, a 1.5% delta. PassMark find prime numbers gives Intel 68 against 58, a 14.7% advantage. These wins are confined to narrow single-threaded or specialized workloads.

The AMD processor wins 13 of 15 head-to-head tests. The average benchmark score confirms the gap: 28128 for AMD versus 13745 for Intel. The AMD chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-13490F at 28185 (-0.2% delta) and Intel Core i5-14500T at 28065 (0.2% delta). The Intel Core 3 304's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX at 13786 (-0.3% delta) and Intel Core i7-8750H at 13868 (-0.9% delta).

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 | Intel Core 3 304 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 5 |

| Threads | 12 | 5 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe lanes | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Launch MSRP | None | $309 |

| Part number | 100-000001337 | SAE3K |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 delivers decisive advantages in multi-threaded productivity, content creation, and compute-heavy workloads. The 147.7% lead in integer math and 115.3% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core indicate strong performance for compilation, scientific computing, and rendering tasks. The 96.4% advantage in data compression and 82.2% lead in random string sorting point to efficient handling of archive operations and data processing.

The AMD chip's 30.7% lead in data encryption and 67.2% advantage in extended instructions suggest suitability for security-related workloads and modern vectorized code. The 36.7% lead in floating point math supports use in simulations, 3D modeling, and financial analysis. The 63.4% advantage in PassMark multithread confirms strong scaling across available cores. The 23.8% lead in physics performance benefits physics simulation and certain engineering applications.

The AMD processor's dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and 14 PCIe lanes provide a more capable platform for memory-intensive applications and peripheral connectivity. ECC memory support adds reliability for data integrity-sensitive tasks.

The Intel Core 3 304 wins in two narrow areas. The 14.7% advantage in find prime numbers indicates an edge in specific integer-heavy algorithms that favor its architecture. The 1.5% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core shows slightly higher legacy single-threaded performance in that specific test. However, the Intel chip's 15 W TDP makes it the lower-power option, which may suit thermally constrained designs or systems prioritizing energy efficiency over throughput.

The Intel chip's single-channel memory and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth limit memory-bound workloads. Its 6 PCIe lanes restrict expansion capabilities. The lack of ECC support limits use in error-sensitive environments.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins 13 of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, with an average score of 28128 versus 13745 for the Intel Core 3 304. The AMD processor's 80th percentile ranking versus the Intel chip's 68th percentile confirms the overall gap.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 suits workloads requiring substantial multi-threaded throughput: rendering, video encoding, software compilation, data analysis, and scientific computing. Its dual-channel memory, higher bandwidth, ECC support, and greater PCIe lane count make it the more capable platform for demanding mobile workstations.

The Intel Core 3 304 suits scenarios where power draw matters more than raw performance. Its 15 W TDP versus 28 W for AMD means lower thermal output, which benefits compact laptops and fanless designs. The single-core wins in prime number finding and Cinebench R15 single-core show it handles light single-threaded tasks competently. The Intel chip also carries a launch MSRP of $309.

For users prioritizing compute performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is the clear choice from the recorded data. For users prioritizing low power consumption and accepting reduced multi-threaded performance, the Intel Core 3 304 occupies a specific niche. The benchmark results do not show the Intel part as competitive in heavily threaded scenarios, where the AMD chip leads by margins ranging from 23.8% to 147.7%.