AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two processors with different intended roles. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is a mobile processor with six Zen 5 cores, twelve threads, and an 80th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 3 201TE is a desktop processor with four cores, eight threads, and a 50th percentile ranking. The Ryzen AI 5 435 has an average benchmark score of 28,128, placing it near the Intel Core i5-13490F (28,185, a 0.2% difference) and ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T (28,065, a 0.2% margin). The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct performance comparison is limited to architecture and specification analysis. The AMD part is the stronger compute option based on core count, thread count, and measured scores. The Intel part serves a desktop socket with higher clock speeds and newer PCIe generation.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in multi-threaded workloads because it has six cores and twelve threads versus four cores and eight threads on the Intel Core 3 201TE. The AMD chip also has a higher process node efficiency at 4 nm versus 10 nm for Intel, and it uses Zen 5 architecture. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for Intel. The AMD chip is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, while the Intel chip is a desktop part with a 45 W TDP. The Intel Core 3 201TE wins in single-thread clock speed potential, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.50 GHz on the AMD chip. The Intel chip also has a higher base clock at 2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. The Intel processor has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the AMD processor has 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Intel chip has a larger L3 cache at 12 MB shared versus 4 MB on the AMD chip. The Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform, while the AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $134.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that includes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm from TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the codename Bartlett Lake, part of the Core 3 generation, and the process node is 10 nm from Intel. The AMD chip has six cores and twelve threads. The Intel chip has four cores and eight threads. The AMD L1 cache is 80 KB per core, and the Intel L1 cache is also 80 KB per core. The AMD L2 cache is 1 MB per core, while the Intel L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core. The AMD L3 cache is 4 MB, while the Intel L3 cache is 12 MB shared. The Intel die size is 163 mm², while the AMD die size is not recorded. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration. The AMD memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, and the Intel memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD integrated graphics are Radeon 840M, and the Intel integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip has a production status of Active, and the Intel chip also has a production status of Active. The AMD release date is 2026-01-04, and the Intel release date is 2025-01-12. The AMD part number is 100-000001337, and the Intel part number is SRPKDQ5CK. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has six cores and twelve threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has four cores and eight threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and the Intel Core 3 201TE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: The database shows no benchmark scores for the Intel Core 3 201TE, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has multiple recorded scores, including Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the wins count for both processors is zero. However, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a full set of individual benchmark scores, and its nearest rivals provide context for its performance level. The AMD chip scores 11,333 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,816 in Cinebench R23 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1,686 multi-core and 260 single-core. In PassMark tests, the AMD chip scores 61,026 in integer math, 40,627 in floating point math, 22,5374 in data compression, 11,110 in data encryption, 16,197 in extended instructions, 58 in find prime numbers, 19,000 in multithread, 1,075 in physics, 24,891 in random string sorting, and 3,734 in single thread. The average benchmark score for the AMD chip is 28,128, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 80. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13490F with an average score of 28,185, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the AMD chip is slightly behind that rival. The AMD chip is ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T by 0.2% (28,065 average score), ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE by 0.3% (28,054 average score), and ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G by 0.3% (28,032 average score). These deltas show that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 sits in a tight performance cluster, within 0.3% of all four nearest rivals. The Intel Core 3 201TE has an average benchmark score of zero and no nearest rivals, which means the database has no measured performance data for that chip. The percentile for the Intel chip is 50, which is below the AMD chip's 80th percentile. The AMD chip's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 11,333 indicates strong throughput for a six-core mobile part, and the PassMark multithread score of 19,000 reinforces that. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,734 shows competitive single-core performance, though the Intel chip has a 0.10 GHz higher boost clock. The AMD chip's data compression score of 225,374 and integer math score of 61,026 suggest good productivity performance. The Intel chip's lack of benchmark data means no direct score comparison is possible, so the analysis relies on architectural differences and the AMD chip's measured results. The AMD chip's 80th percentile ranking places it above the median CPU in the database, while the Intel chip's 50th percentile places it at the median. The AMD chip's average score of 28,128 is comparable to desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-13490F, which shows that the mobile AMD part delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance. The Intel Core 3 201TE, with four cores and eight threads, is likely to fall behind in multi-threaded workloads based on core count alone, but the absence of measured scores prevents a definitive quantitative statement. The AMD chip's higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s on the Intel chip also favors the AMD part in memory-intensive tasks. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache of 12 MB versus 4 MB on the AMD chip may help in some cache-sensitive workloads, but the AMD chip's higher core and thread count and faster memory bandwidth are more significant advantages in general compute. The Intel chip's higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz on the AMD chip suggests better idle-to-load responsiveness, and the higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.50 GHz gives the Intel chip a small single-thread clock advantage. The Intel chip's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes versus PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes on the AMD chip makes the Intel platform more capable for high-bandwidth expansion devices. The AMD chip's 4 nm process node from TSMC versus Intel's 10 nm process node indicates a more advanced manufacturing process for the AMD part. The AMD chip's TDP of 28 W versus 45 W on the Intel chip shows that the AMD part is designed for lower power consumption, which is consistent with its mobile market segment. The Intel chip's market segment is Desktop, and its socket is Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD chip's market segment is Mobile with AMD Socket FP8. The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in mobile platforms, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, which is typical for desktop platforms. Both processors support ECC memory, which is useful for workstation and server applications. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. The AMD chip's release date is 2026-01-04, and the Intel chip's release date is 2025-01-12, so the Intel chip was released earlier by about a year. The AMD chip's integrated graphics, Radeon 840M, are likely more capable than the Intel UHD Graphics 730 based on the AMD chip's newer architecture and mobile design, but the database does not include specific graphics benchmark scores for either chip.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz on the AMD chip and 2.90 GHz on the Intel chip. The boost clock is 4.50 GHz on the AMD chip and 4.60 GHz on the Intel chip. The TDP is 28 W on the AMD chip and 45 W on the Intel chip. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD architecture is Zen 5, while the Intel architecture is not recorded. The codename is Gorgon Point for AMD and Bartlett Lake for Intel. The generation is Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) for AMD and Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) for Intel. The process node is 4 nm for AMD from TSMC and 10 nm for Intel from Intel. The die size is not recorded for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for both. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 4 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. The memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, and DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The memory bus is dual-channel for both. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe is Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only) for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) for Intel. The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. The production status is Active for both. The release date is 2026-01-04 for AMD and 2025-01-12 for Intel. The launch MSRP is not recorded for AMD and $134 for Intel. The multiplier is not unlocked for either. The part number is 100-000001337 for AMD and SRPKDQ5CK for Intel.