AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison scenario. The Ryzen AI 5 435 has a complete set of benchmark scores across multiple test suites, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This absence creates a one-sided data profile, but the available measurements for the Ryzen AI 5 435 still provide a detailed picture of its performance positioning.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 1686 points. Its single-core result in the same test reaches 260 points. Moving to Cinebench R23, the multicore score climbs to 11333, while single-core performance registers 1816 points. These results indicate a processor that scales well from single-threaded to multi-threaded workloads, with the R23 multicore figure representing roughly 6.2 times the single-core score, which suggests effective utilization of its 6 cores and 12 threads under sustained load.

The Passmark suite offers a broader range of specialized measurements. In integer math, the Ryzen AI 5 435 produces 61026 operations, while floating point math reaches 40627. The extended instructions test yields 16197, and data encryption processes 11110 operations. Data compression shows a notably high result at 225374, which indicates strong throughput in memory and cache intensive compression workloads. Random string sorting completes at 24891, and prime number finding scores 58. The multithread score stands at 19000, with physics processing at 1075 and single-thread performance at 3734.

The average benchmark score for the Ryzen AI 5 435 is 28128, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database. This percentile positioning is substantial, indicating that the chip outperforms the majority of recorded processors despite its mobile market segment and 28 watt TDP. The nearest rival data confirms this placement. The Intel Core i5-13490F averages 28185, which is a 0.2 percent advantage over the Ryzen AI 5 435. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065, putting it 0.2 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G both sit at 28054 and 28032 respectively, trailing by 0.3 percent in both cases. These deltas are remarkably small, placing the Ryzen AI 5 435 in a tightly contested cluster where the difference between first and last among these four rivals is less than one percent.

The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS cannot be compared directly in head-to-head terms because no benchmark scores exist for it in the database. Its percentile rank is recorded at 50, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero. The absence of measurement data means any performance relationship between these two processors remains undefined by the recorded metrics.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in every category where data exists, simply because it is the only processor in this comparison with recorded measurements. Its strengths are distributed across several workload types. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11333 demonstrates capability in rendering and content creation tasks that scale with thread count. The Passmark integer math result of 61026 and floating point math result of 40627 indicate strong general computation throughput.

The data compression score of 225374 stands out as the highest individual measurement in the Passmark suite for this chip. This suggests particular efficiency in archiving, database operations, and file system workloads that rely on compression algorithms. The encryption score of 11110 points to solid cryptographic throughput, relevant for secure communications and storage encryption scenarios. Extended instructions performance at 16197 shows good support for vectorized and specialized instruction sets.

The single-thread score of 3734 on Passmark, paired with the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1816, indicates that the Zen 5 architecture delivers competitive per-core performance. This matters for applications that depend on single-threaded responsiveness, such as legacy software, certain database queries, and user interface interactions. The multithread score of 19000 confirms that the processor also handles concurrent workloads effectively.

The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no recorded wins in any benchmark category. Its 50th percentile position and zero average score in the database mean no workload-specific strengths can be identified from the available data. The comparison is therefore asymmetrical, with all performance observations derived from the Ryzen AI 5 435 measurements alone.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The average benchmark score is 28128, which places the processor at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 435 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F is 0.2 percent ahead with an average score of 28185. The Intel Core i5-14500T trails by 0.2 percent at 28065, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G both sit 0.3 percent behind with scores of 28054 and 28032 respectively.

Q: Does the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero with a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: What are the Cinebench results for the Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The processor scores 1686 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 260 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 11333 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and 1816 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 435 perform in Passmark integer and floating point math?

A: The integer math score is 61026, and the floating point math score is 40627.

Q: What is the highest individual Passmark score recorded for the Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The data compression test produces the highest score at 225374, followed by the multithread test at 19000 and extended instructions at 16197.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several foundational specifications. Both use the AMD Socket FP8, both feature 6 cores and 12 threads, both support dual-channel memory, both list a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, both support ECC memory, and both are classified as mobile market segment parts with active production status. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The base clock differs significantly. The Ryzen AI 5 435 runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS runs at 4.30 GHz. The boost clock also favors the embedded part, with 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz for the AI 5 435. Thermal design power shows a substantial gap: the Ryzen AI 5 435 is rated at 28 watts, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS is rated at 45 watts.

PCI Express lane allocation differs, with the Ryzen AI 5 435 providing Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only) and the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS providing Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well, with the Ryzen AI 5 435 using the Radeon 840M and the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS using the Radeon 760M. Memory support varies, as the Ryzen AI 5 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS supports DDR5 only.

Release timing differs by roughly 21 months. The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS carries a release date of April 2024, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 carries a release date of January 2026. The part number for the Ryzen AI 5 435 is listed as 100-000001337, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS part number is unknown. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two chips is clear. The Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that incorporates Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS uses Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen Embedded generation. Both are manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, so the node technology is identical, but the underlying core designs belong to different generations.

Cache organization reveals notable differences. The Ryzen AI 5 435 provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache difference is particularly pronounced, with the Zen 4 part offering four times the L3 capacity of the Zen 5 part. The L1 cache per core favors the Zen 5 chip by 16 KB per core.

Physical characteristics are recorded only for the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. It contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. No transistor count or die size data exists for the Ryzen AI 5 435 in the database.

The integrated graphics also differ architecturally. The Ryzen AI 5 435 embeds the Radeon 840M, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS embeds the Radeon 760M. These are different GPU implementations, though the database does not record specific execution unit counts or clock speeds for either.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The Ryzen AI 5 435 is fully characterized by benchmark measurements, while the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no recorded performance data. This means the verdict must be drawn from what the database actually contains, without speculation about unmeasured performance.

For the Ryzen AI 5 435, the recorded measurements show a processor at the 80th percentile overall, with an average score of 28128 that places it within 0.3 percent of four closely matched rivals. Its strongest results appear in data compression at 225374 and integer math at 61026, which suggests suitability for workloads involving data processing, compression, and general computation. Its single-thread score of 3734 on Passmark and 1816 on Cinebench R23 indicates robust per-core performance for Zen 5 architecture. The 28 watt TDP combined with these scores points to efficient performance delivery in a mobile form factor.

For the Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, the database records no benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile placement. The specification data shows higher clocks, with a 4.30 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, a 45 watt TDP, 16 MB of L3 cache, and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. These specifications suggest a different design focus, but the absence of benchmark measurements prevents any quantitative performance assessment.

The choice between these two processors depends on what the database can support. The Ryzen AI 5 435 has verifiable performance data indicating strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capability, a high percentile ranking, and competitive standing against its nearest rivals. The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS offers higher clock speeds and more L3 cache on paper, but no recorded measurements exist to confirm how those specifications translate into actual benchmark performance. Users requiring documented performance evidence should rely on the Ryzen AI 5 435 data. Users prioritizing the embedded part's higher clocks, larger cache, and additional PCIe lanes must accept that no benchmark validation exists in the database to verify those specifications in practice.