AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Intel Xeon D-2752TER Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and Intel Xeon D-2752TER occupy different corners of the processor market. The Ryzen AI 5 340 is a 6-core mobile part built on Zen 5, while the Xeon D-2752TER is a 12-core server/workstation chip based on Ice Lake. In head-to-head testing, the AMD part wins 9 of 15 benchmarks, while the Intel part takes 6. Both sit at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, but the AMD chip posts a higher average benchmark score of 25981 against 25530 for the Xeon.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark split reveals two distinct personalities. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 dominates in single-thread and math-oriented workloads. Its Passmark single-thread score of 3683 is 85.1% higher than the Xeon's 1990, a massive gap that carries over to Cinebench R15 single-core (242.6 vs 230, a 5.5% lead). The AMD part also wins in floating-point math (39967 vs 33533, 19.2% ahead), extended instructions (16440 vs 13846, 18.7% ahead), and integer math (63078 vs 60881, 3.6% ahead). Data compression is nearly a tie, with AMD ahead by 0.9% (229796 vs 227763). The Ryzen also takes the Passmark multithread test (19506 vs 19102, 2.1% ahead) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (1915 vs 1634, 17.2% ahead).

The Intel Xeon D-2752TER counters in multi-threaded rendering and specific server-oriented tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16212 is 22.7% higher than the AMD's 12532, and its R23 single-core of 2288 beats 1915.5 by 16.3%. The Xeon also leads in Passmark physics (1777 vs 1095, 38.4% ahead), random string sorting (31802 vs 24970, 21.5% ahead), data encryption (13097 vs 11470, 12.4% ahead), and find prime numbers (96 vs 72, 25% ahead). These results point to a clear use-case split: the Ryzen AI 5 340 excels at interactive, latency-sensitive, and math-heavy tasks, while the Xeon D-2752TER is better suited for sustained multi-threaded rendering, encryption, and physics simulation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 195 mm². It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER uses the Ice Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, with 12 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 1800 MHz, and a boost clock of 2.80 GHz. The Xeon's TDP is 77 W, more than double the Ryzen's 28 W, reflecting its server-oriented design.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: the Ryzen has 8 MB, while the Xeon has 20 MB shared. Memory support also diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Xeon uses DDR4 over a quad-channel bus with 85.3 GB/s. The Xeon supports ECC memory, the Ryzen does not. PCIe connectivity favors the Xeon with 32 Gen 4 lanes versus 16 on the Ryzen. The Ryzen includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU, while the Xeon has none. The Ryzen is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Xeon is a server/workstation chip on Intel BGA 2579. The Ryzen was released on 2025-01-05, the Xeon on 2022-02-23.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single-thread margin in the entire comparison belongs to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. In Passmark single-thread, it scores 3683 against the Xeon's 1990, a 85.1% advantage. This is the most decisive result in the dataset. The Ryzen also leads in floating-point math by 19.2% (39967 vs 33533) and extended instructions by 18.7% (16440 vs 13846). In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen is 17.2% ahead (1915 vs 1634), and in R15 single-core it leads by 5.5% (242.6 vs 230). The Ryzen's Passmark multithread score of 19506 is 2.1% higher than the Xeon's 19102, and its integer math score of 63078 is 3.6% higher than 60881. Data compression is nearly even, with the Ryzen ahead by 0.9% (229796 vs 227763).

The Intel Xeon D-2752TER's biggest win is in Passmark physics, where it scores 1777 against the Ryzen's 1095, a 38.4% lead. It also takes random string sorting by 21.5% (31802 vs 24970) and find prime numbers by 25% (96 vs 72). In Cinebench R23, the Xeon leads multi-core by 22.7% (16212 vs 12532) and single-core by 16.3% (2288 vs 1915.5). Data encryption goes to the Xeon by 12.4% (13097 vs 11470). These results show that the Xeon's advantage grows in workloads that scale with core count and cache size, while the Ryzen's higher clock speed and newer architecture dominate single-thread and math-heavy tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. Its Passmark single-thread score of 3683 is 85.1% higher than the Intel Xeon D-2752TER's 1990. It also leads in Cinebench R15 single-core (242.6 vs 230) but trails in Cinebench R23 single-core (1915.5 vs 2288).

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon D-2752TER supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 does not.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, slightly higher than the Xeon's 85.3 GB/s. The Xeon uses quad-channel DDR4, while the Ryzen uses dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X.

Q: Which processor includes an integrated GPU?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, which has a Radeon 840M. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 was released on 2025-01-05, while the Intel Xeon D-2752TER was released on 2022-02-23.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 | Intel Xeon D-2752TER |

|-------|--------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1800 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 2.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 77 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 2579 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Ice Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | Not specified |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1 MB | 1.25 MB |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 85.3 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 32 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2022-02-23 |

| Launch MSRP | Not disclosed | $1061 |