AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and the Intel Core 7 350 are both 6-core mobile processors, but the data shows they are engineered for entirely different workloads. The AMD chip dominates multi-threaded and data-heavy tasks, while the Intel chip takes the lead in single-threaded responsiveness and specific math workloads. The headline results are clear: the Ryzen AI 5 340 wins 8 of the 15 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, while the Core 7 350 wins 7, but the margins of victory tell a more complete story than the win count alone.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive advantage for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 appears in multi-core rendering tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 12532 against Intel's 8030, a 56.1% lead. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a similar pattern, with AMD at 1915 versus Intel's 1220, a 57% advantage. These are the largest multi-core deltas in the dataset and indicate that the Ryzen AI 5 340 delivers substantially higher sustained throughput for CPU-heavy rendering workloads.

The integer math test reveals the biggest single benchmark gap of the entire comparison. AMD scores 63078 in PassMark integer math, while Intel manages only 33734. That is an 87% difference, the largest delta recorded between the two parts. The data compression test also favors AMD heavily: 229796 versus 143123, a 60.6% lead. Random string sorting, which often reflects database and sorting performance, goes to AMD by 44.9% (24970 versus 17238). Extended instructions, a test of SIMD and specialized instruction throughput, favor AMD by 36.5% (16440 versus 12045). The multithread PassMark score confirms the pattern, with AMD at 19506 against Intel's 15170, a 28.6% lead. Even the closer data encryption test goes to AMD, though by a narrower 4.9% margin (11470 versus 10933).

Intel's wins are concentrated in single-threaded and scalar workloads, but they are not trivial. The Cinebench R15 single-core test shows Intel at 292 against AMD's 242.6, a 16.9% advantage. The PassMark single-thread test shows Intel at 4100 versus 3683, a 10.2% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core is closer, with Intel at 2046 against 1915.5, a 6.4% edge. The find prime numbers test is a notable outlier: Intel scores 107 versus AMD's 72, a 32.7% advantage, the largest margin of any Intel win. Floating point math also goes to Intel, 42809 versus 39967, a 6.6% lead, and the physics test mirrors that exact 6.6% margin (1173 versus 1095).

The overall averages reflect these distributions. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has an average benchmark score of 25981 across all recorded tests, placing it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 7 350 averages 17779, which places it at the 71st percentile. The nearest rival data confirms the AMD chip competes in a higher performance class: its closest neighbor, the Intel Core i7-14701TE, scores 26013, just 0.1% above, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS sits 0.5% below. The Intel Core 7 350, by contrast, sits near the Intel Core 5 221TE (17860, 0.5% below) and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (17891, 0.6% below).

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different silicon. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC using the Zen 5 architecture, with the Krackan Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 7 350 is fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process and uses the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation. The process node difference, 4 nm versus 3 nm, is the most direct fabrication comparison, though the foundries differ: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel.

Core and thread counts diverge sharply. Both have 6 cores, but the AMD chip supports 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel chip has no SMT and therefore 6 threads. This thread advantage is the most likely structural driver behind AMD's multi-core wins. The base clocks also differ: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.50 GHz, though both boost to 4.80 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are structured very differently. The AMD chip uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel chip uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has more private cache per core, which may contribute to its single-thread performance, while AMD's larger L3 pool, 8 MB versus 6 MB, gives it more shared capacity.

Memory architecture shows a major platform difference. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but AMD runs a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while Intel runs a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s. That bandwidth gap, roughly 50% in favor of AMD, likely contributes to the AMD wins in data compression and random string sorting, which are memory-sensitive. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using the Radeon 840M and Intel using Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has a multiplier unlocked for overclocking.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is the choice for multi-threaded throughput. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532, a 56.1% lead over Intel, and its 87% lead in integer math make it the stronger option for rendering, compilation, and general parallel compute. The 60.6% lead in data compression and the 44.9% lead in random string sorting point to advantages in file archiving, database operations, and data processing. The 36.5% lead in extended instructions further supports workloads that use SIMD or specialized instruction sets. The 28.6% multithread PassMark lead rounds out the picture: any workload that can use more than 6 threads will see a meaningful advantage on the AMD part.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins where single-thread latency and scalar performance matter more. Its 16.9% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core and 10.2% lead in PassMark single-thread indicate faster response in lightly threaded applications, older software, and UI-driven tasks. The 32.7% lead in find prime numbers is a pure scalar integer workload and shows a strong per-core capability. The 6.6% wins in floating point math and physics suggest a slight edge in simulation or physics calculation tasks that are not fully threaded. The 6.4% Cinebench R23 single-core lead is smaller but still consistent.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. It leads by 57% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1915 versus 1220) and by 56.1% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (12532 versus 8030).

Q: Which processor has higher single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 7 350. It wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 16.9% (292 versus 242.6), Cinebench R23 single-core by 6.4% (2046 versus 1915.5), and PassMark single-thread by 10.2% (4100 versus 3683).

Q: Why does the AMD chip have such a large lead in integer math?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 63078 in PassMark integer math versus 33734 for Intel, an 87% difference. This is the largest benchmark gap between the two and reflects the AMD chip's 12-thread capability against Intel's 6 threads.

Q: Do the two chips support the same memory?

A: Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but AMD uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Core 7 350 is built on Intel's 3 nm process.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each part?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has an average score of 25981 across all recorded tests, placing it at the 78th percentile. The Intel Core 7 350 averages 17779, placing it at the 71st percentile.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a clear split. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads, with decisive leads in rendering, integer math, compression, and sorting tasks. Its 12 threads, dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and 8 MB of L3 cache give it the structural resources to sustain high throughput. The average benchmark score of 25981, at the 78th percentile, places it well above the Intel part in overall performance.

The Intel Core 7 350 is the stronger processor for single-threaded and scalar workloads. Its per-core cache configuration, 192 KB of L1 and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and its 3 nm node give it an edge in single-thread tests, with a 16.9% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core and a 10.2% lead in PassMark single-thread. The 32.7% win in find prime numbers confirms strong scalar integer execution. The Intel chip also operates at a 15 W TDP versus AMD's 28 W, which the data shows does not prevent it from winning the lighter-threaded tests. Its launch MSRP is $469.

Users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity, data processing, or compilation should select the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. Users who prioritize single-threaded responsiveness, scalar math, or lower power draw should select the Intel Core 7 350.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 | Intel Core 7 350 |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Not specified |

| Codename | Krackan Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $469 |