AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,536
2,842
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
357
303
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
10,569
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,491
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
25,165
18,698
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,552
1,992
passmark_data_compression
368,884
354,510
passmark_data_encryption
21,820
18,297
passmark_extended_instructions
27,714
25,113
passmark_find_prime_numbers
91
117
passmark_floating_point_math
63,490
62,802
passmark_integer_math
103,390
101,831
passmark_multithread
30,378
29,467
passmark_physics
1,430
1,704
passmark_random_string_sorting
44,668
39,447
passmark_single_thread
3,920
3,841
passmark_singlethread
3,920
3,841
geekbench_multicore
N/A
13,760
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,253

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits these two mobile processors into distinct usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS takes 12 of the 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins only 3. The wins for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are concentrated in single-threaded performance, multi-core rendering, and data processing workloads. Its strongest margin comes in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it delivers a 78.3% advantage over the Ryzen AI 9 365, scoring 3552 against 1992. That is a decisive gap for lightly threaded applications such as legacy productivity tools or user interface responsiveness.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 counters in Cinebench R15 multi-core, scoring 2842 versus 2536, a 10.8% edge. It also wins PassMark physics with 1704 versus 1430, a 16.1% advantage, and PassMark find prime numbers with 117 versus 91, a 22.2% margin. These wins point toward workloads that scale with additional cores or benefit from the newer architecture's integer throughput in prime number calculations.

For the majority of general-purpose tasks, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS leads. It wins PassMark data encryption by 19.3%, random string sorting by 13.2%, extended instructions by 10.4%, and data compression by 4.1%. The multi-threaded PassMark score favors it by 3.1%, and integer math by 1.5%. Single-thread PassMark shows a 2.1% lead. Cinebench R23 multi-core is a major win for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 25165 versus 18698, a 34.6% gap. This indicates that long-running render tasks and compilation workloads will complete substantially faster on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, despite the Ryzen AI 9 365 having two additional cores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different AMD generations. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, part of the Ryzen 9 generation. The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation. Both are built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but the die sizes differ: the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS measures 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 measures 233 mm² with transistor count not recorded in the database.

Core counts differ meaningfully. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Ryzen AI 9 365 combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores in a hybrid arrangement. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has uniform Zen 4 cores. Base clocks separate the two strongly: the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS runs at 4.00 GHz base with a 5.20 GHz boost, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 runs at 2.00 GHz base with a 5.00 GHz boost. The Ryzen AI 9 365's low base clock reflects its hybrid core design and lower power envelope.

Thermal design power differs. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is rated at 45 W TDP, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 is rated at 28 W TDP. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses AMD Socket FP8. Cache configurations also differ. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. Both support dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, but the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports DDR5 and ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with no ECC support.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS pairs with Radeon 780M graphics, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 pairs with Radeon 880M graphics. PCIe lanes differ: the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the Ryzen AI 9 365 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both processors are locked (multiplier not unlocked), both target the mobile market segment, and both remain in active production as of the database records. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS launched on April 15, 2024, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 launched on June 30, 2024.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the stronger all-around processor for compute-heavy workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25165 versus 18698 represents a 34.6% advantage, and its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3552 versus 1992 is a 78.3% advantage. These are not marginal differences. Applications that rely on sustained multi-threaded execution, such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, will show large performance gains on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 does not match the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in most benchmarks, but its wins are not trivial. The 10.8% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core and the 16.1% lead in PassMark physics suggest that its 10-core, 20-thread configuration can outperform in specific parallel workloads, particularly those that are short-lived or scale well with core count. The 22.2% win in find prime numbers indicates an advantage in certain integer-heavy algorithms.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 has a lower TDP of 28 W versus 45 W for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. That difference matters for system design, since a lower TDP allows thinner chassis and longer battery life in mobile devices. The Ryzen AI 9 365 also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in compact laptops, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports ECC memory, which suits workstation or professional use cases.

The percentile rankings place the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41963. The Ryzen AI 9 365 sits at the 87th percentile with an average benchmark score of 40048. The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS include the Intel Core i7-14700T at 41914 (0.1% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 at 42055 (0.2% lower). The Ryzen AI 9 365's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40081 (0.1% lower) and the Intel Core 5 221E at 40144 (0.2% lower). Both processors sit in a tightly packed performance band around their respective average scores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS leads in single-core tests. It scores 3552 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 1992 for the Ryzen AI 9 365, a 78.3% advantage. PassMark single-thread also favors it at 3920 versus 3841.

Q: Does the Ryzen AI 9 365 win any benchmarks?

A: Yes. It wins Cinebench R15 multi-core (2842 versus 2536), PassMark physics (1704 versus 1430), and PassMark find prime numbers (117 versus 91).

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports DDR5 with ECC memory. The Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X without ECC. Both use dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a 45 W TDP, and the Ryzen AI 9 365 has a 28 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The base clocks are 4.00 GHz and 2.00 GHz respectively.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single benchmark gap in the comparison is Cinebench R23 single-core. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 3552, and the Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 1992, a 78.3% difference. This is the defining advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in any workload that does not scale across cores. The R15 single-core test shows a similar pattern at 357 versus 303, a 17.8% lead. These results are consistent with the higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz and the uniform Zen 4 core design.

Cinebench R23 multi-core reverses the core-count expectation. Despite having 10 cores versus 8, the Ryzen AI 9 365 scores only 18698, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 25165. The 34.6% margin suggests that the Ryzen AI 9 365's hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c configuration does not sustain multi-threaded throughput as effectively as the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS's eight full Zen 4 cores. The R15 multi-core test tells a different story: the Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 2842 to 2536, a 10.8% edge. The difference between the R15 and R23 multi-core results may reflect workload duration and thermal behavior, since the Ryzen AI 9 365 has a 28 W TDP.

PassMark results cluster more closely. Data compression goes to the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 368884 versus 354510, a 4.1% margin. Data encryption shows a larger gap at 21820 versus 18297, a 19.3% advantage. Extended instructions favor the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS by 10.4% (27714 versus 25113). Random string sorting goes to the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 44668 versus 39447, a 13.2% margin. Floating point math is nearly even at 63490 versus 62802, a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Integer math is also close at 103390 versus 101831, a 1.5% edge. PassMark multithread favors the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 30378 versus 29467, a 3.1% margin. PassMark single-thread and singlethread both show 3920 versus 3841, a 2.1% lead.

The Ryzen AI 9 365's wins are narrower in overall impact. PassMark physics shows 1704 versus 1430, a 16.1% advantage. Find prime numbers shows 117 versus 91, a 22.2% advantage. These wins indicate that the extra cores and Zen 5 architecture provide real benefits in specific computational patterns, but they do not offset the broad lead held by the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS across the rest of the benchmark suite.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS comes from the 8000 series as a Ryzen 9 part, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 series. Architecture separates them: Zen 4 (Hawk Point) versus Zen 5 (Strix Point). The process node is identical at 4 nm from TSMC, but die size differs at 178 mm² versus 233 mm². Transistor count is recorded for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 25,000 million, with no transistor count listed for the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Core and thread counts differ: 8 cores / 16 threads versus 10 cores / 20 threads. Base clocks are far apart at 4.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, and boost clocks are close at 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP is 45 W versus 28 W. Sockets are FP7 versus FP8. Cache layouts differ in L1 size per core (64 KB versus 80 KB), while L2 stays at 1 MB per core and L3 stays at 16 MB for both. Memory support differs: DDR5 only versus DDR5 and LPDDR5X. ECC memory is supported only on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Memory bandwidth is identical at 89.6 GB/s over dual-channel buses. PCIe configuration differs at Gen 4 with 20 lanes versus Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 780M versus Radeon 880M. Both are mobile processors, both are active in production, both have locked multipliers, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP. Release dates are April 15, 2024 for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and June 30, 2024 for the Ryzen AI 9 365.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 PRO 8945HS
AI 9 365
Core Specs
Cores
8
10 +25.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
2 -50.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
4
2 -50.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Multiplier
40
20 -50.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
16 MB
Power
TDP (W)
45
28 -37.8%
Configurable TDP
35-54 W
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 5
Codename
Hawk Point
Strix Point
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
4 nm
4 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
—
Die Size
178 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
AMD Socket FP8
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
4 + 6
E-Core Frequency
—
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
Radeon 880M
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001314(FP7r2),100-000001386(FP7)
100-000001530
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FP8
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS Details View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details