AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT vs Intel Core 5 221E Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

CORE STATE Vermeer
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 105W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 221E

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
10,624
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
1,853
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,589
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
6,607
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
11,040
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
942
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
3,767
2,613
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
531
368
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
15,696
10,891
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
2,215
1,537
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
37,373
25,933
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
5,276
3,661
passmark_data_compression
597,862
324,285
passmark_data_encryption
37,814
19,205
passmark_extended_instructions
39,141
18,216
passmark_find_prime_numbers
205
173
passmark_floating_point_math
99,398
79,028
passmark_integer_math
177,566
117,813
passmark_multithread
43,810
30,510
passmark_physics
1,715
2,230
passmark_random_string_sorting
62,537
37,686
passmark_single_thread
3,474
4,147
passmark_singlethread
3,474
4,147

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT vs Intel Core 5 221E

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive overall victory for the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, which wins 14 of the 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The Intel Core 5 221E takes only three wins, but those wins matter in specific workloads.

The largest margins belong to AMD in compute-heavy tasks. In PassMark extended instructions, the Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 39,141 against 18,216 for the Intel part, a 114.9% advantage. That is the single biggest delta in the dataset. PassMark data encryption shows a 96.9% lead (37,814 versus 19,205), and data compression favors AMD by 84.4% (597,862 versus 324,285). Integer math also goes strongly to AMD: 177,566 versus 117,813, a 50.7% gap. Random string sorting shows a 65.9% margin (62,537 versus 37,686).

Cinebench results are uniformly in AMD's favor with a consistent delta of roughly 44%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 9 5900XT records 37,373 against 25,933 for the Intel Core 5 221E (44.1%). Single-core R23 shows 5,276 versus 3,661, also 44.1%. Cinebench R20 mirrors this pattern: multi-core 15,696 versus 10,891 (44.1%), single-core 2,215 versus 1,537 (44.1%). Cinebench R15 repeats the same trend: multi-core 3,767 versus 2,613 (44.2%), single-core 531 versus 368 (44.3%). The near-identical deltas across Cinebench versions indicate a structural performance difference rather than workload-specific behavior.

PassMark multi-threaded performance favors AMD by 43.6% (43,810 versus 30,510). Floating point math goes to AMD by 25.8% (99,398 versus 79,028), and find prime numbers shows a smaller 18.5% lead (205 versus 173).

The Intel Core 5 221E wins PassMark physics with a score of 2,230 against 1,715, a 23.1% advantage. It also takes single-threaded PassMark by 16.2%: 4,147 versus 3,474. Both PassMark single-thread fields report identical scores for each processor, confirming the result.

Overall average benchmark scores place the AMD part at 50,718 versus 40,144 for Intel, a gap of roughly 26%. The AMD processor sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel part sits at the 87th percentile. The Ryzen 9 5900XT's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900T (delta of -0.6%) and the Intel Core i9-13980HX (delta of 0.6%), placing it in strong company. The Core 5 221E's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (delta of 0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (delta of -0.3%).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. AMD builds the Ryzen 9 5900XT on TSMC's 7 nm process, while Intel manufactures the Core 5 221E on its own 10 nm node. The AMD chip, codenamed Vermeer, uses the Zen 3 architecture from the 5000 series. The Intel chip, codenamed Bartlett Lake, belongs to the Core 5 generation.

Core counts differ substantially. The Ryzen 9 5900XT has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Core 5 221E has 14 cores and 20 threads. That thread deficit explains much of the multi-threaded gap, but single-thread Cinebench also favors AMD despite the Intel part's higher boost clock.

Cache layouts are structurally different. AMD uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. Intel uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Intel's larger per-core L2 does not translate into benchmark wins outside of physics and single-thread PassMark.

The AMD die is composed of two chiplets at 2x 74 mm², totaling 148 mm², with 8,300 million transistors. Intel uses a monolithic die of 257 mm². Transistor count for Intel is not recorded in the database.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR4 only, with dual-channel memory and 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe implementation favors Intel with Gen 5 and 16 CPU lanes, while AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics are present only on the Intel part, which carries UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor has no integrated graphics. This is a meaningful platform difference for systems that need display output without a discrete GPU.

The Ryzen 9 5900XT has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 5 221E is locked. AMD's part uses Socket AM4; Intel's uses Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT is the clear choice for multi-threaded productivity and compute workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,373 versus 25,933 puts it far ahead for rendering and video encoding. The 84.4% lead in data compression and the 96.9% lead in data encryption make it well suited for archival, backup, and security-related tasks. The 114.9% advantage in extended instructions is notable for workloads that use AVX-style instruction sets, although the database does not specify which instructions are tested. Integer math (50.7% lead) and random string sorting (65.9% lead) indicate strength in database, compilation, and general office-heavy parallel tasks.

The Intel Core 5 221E wins in two specific areas. PassMark physics at 2,230 versus 1,715 (23.1% higher) suggests better performance in physics simulation workloads, which may translate to certain gaming or simulation scenarios. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,147 versus 3,474 (16.2% higher) indicates that the Intel part has an edge in lightly threaded applications where a single core dominates. However, single-thread Cinebench results contradict this: AMD leads R15, R20, and R23 single-core by about 44%. The divergence between PassMark single-thread and Cinebench single-core suggests that the two processors respond differently to the specific instruction mix of each benchmark.

The Intel part also carries integrated graphics, which the AMD part lacks. For systems that require onboard display output, the Core 5 221E is the only one of the two that can operate without a discrete GPU. The Intel part also has a lower TDP of 65 watts against AMD's 105 watts, which matters for cooling and power-constrained builds, though the database does not include measured power consumption.

For users who prioritize peak multi-threaded throughput, the AMD processor wins on nearly every recorded metric. For those who need a specific physics simulation boost or a strong single-thread PassMark result with integrated graphics, the Intel part has a narrower but real niche.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. Core count: AMD has 16 cores, Intel has 14. Threads: AMD has 32, Intel has 20. Base clock: AMD runs at 3.30 GHz, Intel at 2.70 GHz. Boost clock: AMD reaches 4.80 GHz, Intel reaches 5.20 GHz. TDP: AMD is rated at 105 watts, Intel at 65 watts. Process node: AMD uses 7 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. Die size: AMD uses 2x 74 mm² chiplets, Intel uses a single 257 mm² die. Transistors: AMD lists 8,300 million, Intel has no recorded figure.

Cache: AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory: AMD supports DDR4 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD records 51.2 GB/s, Intel records 89.6 GB/s. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD has none, Intel has UHD Graphics 730. Multiplier: AMD is unlocked, Intel is locked. Socket: AMD uses Socket AM4, Intel uses Socket 1700. Release date: AMD launched 2024-07-30, Intel launched 2025-01-12. Launch MSRP: AMD lists $349, Intel lists $232.

The two share some traits. Both are desktop parts, both are in active production, both support ECC memory, and both use a dual-channel memory bus.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 221E has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 37,373 against 25,933 for the Intel Core 5 221E, a 44.1% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 221E win any benchmarks?

A: Yes. It wins PassMark physics (2,230 versus 1,715, a 23.1% advantage) and PassMark single-thread (4,147 versus 3,474, a 16.2% advantage). Both PassMark single-thread fields show the same scores.

Q: Which processor supports integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 5 221E includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT has no integrated graphics.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT supports DDR4 only. The Intel Core 5 221E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT has an average score of 50,718, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 221E has an average score of 40,144, placing it at the 87th percentile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 5900XT
5 221E
Core Specs
Cores
16
14 -12.5%
Threads
32
20 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2.7 -18.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.2 +8.3%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2.7 -18.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.2 +8.3%
Multiplier
33
27 -18.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
105
65 -38.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
154 W
PPT
142 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
—
Codename
Vermeer
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 3 (Vermeer))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,300 million
—
Die Size
2x 74 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
2.1 GHz up to 3.9 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
12 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
—
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$349
$232
Part Number
100-000001581
SRQDVQ659
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
90°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 9 5900XT Details View Core 5 221E Details