AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i7-13700F Comparison

The benchmark data presents a decisive matchup: the Intel Core i7-13700F wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. The Intel part’s average benchmark score of 39009 slightly trails the AMD chip’s 39603, yet in every individual test the desktop processor pulls ahead. The largest gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where Intel scores 32101 against AMD’s 14784, a 53.9% deficit for the Ryzen. Single-core performance tells a similar story, with Intel leading 4532 to 1724 in R23 single-core, a 62% margin. These are not marginal differences; they represent a generational and segment gap between a mobile-focused 28-watt part and a desktop 65-watt processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-13700F dominates every measured workload, but the margins vary significantly by task. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 3235 versus AMD’s 2458, a 24% advantage. The R15 single-core test shows a steeper divide: 456 for Intel against 271.5 for AMD, a 40.5% lead. The R23 suite amplifies the multi-core gap to 53.9% (32101 vs 14784) and the single-core gap to 62% (4532 vs 1724). These Cinebench results indicate that the Intel part’s higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, combined with its 16 cores and 24 threads, translates directly into rendering performance that the AMD’s 8 cores and 16 threads cannot match.

PassMark integer math shows Intel ahead by 34%, scoring 141370 versus 93342. Floating-point math yields a 44.5% margin in Intel’s favor, 100422 to 55739. Prime number finding, a test sensitive to both clock speed and core count, gives Intel a 46.2% edge (156 vs 84). Data compression results in a 34% lead for Intel (471838 vs 311199), while data encryption shows a 30.1% advantage (26956 vs 18838). The extended instructions test narrows the gap to 21.2% (28295 vs 22298), suggesting that AMD’s Zen 4 architecture handles AVX-512-like workloads more efficiently relative to its other weaknesses.

The closest contest appears in PassMark single-thread performance, where Intel leads by only 10.4% (4121 vs 3692). This is notable because AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, nearly matching Intel’s 5.20 GHz, yet Intel still wins. Multi-threaded PassMark results show Intel ahead by 30.6% (38369 vs 26646), and physics simulation gives Intel a 39.6% edge (2236 vs 1351). Random string sorting, a memory-latency-sensitive test, shows Intel leading by 24.1% (49974 vs 37922). Across all 15 benchmarks, the smallest Intel win is the 10.4% single-thread margin, and the largest is the 62% Cinebench R23 single-core gap. The data leaves no ambiguity about raw performance supremacy.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors. Intel’s Core i7-13700F relies on Raptor Lake on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a larger die of 257 mm². The node advantage belongs to AMD, yet it does not overcome Intel’s core-count lead. AMD packs 8 cores and 16 threads; Intel fields 16 cores and 24 threads. Cache hierarchies differ substantially: AMD provides 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel offers 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. That larger L3 cache likely contributes to Intel’s wins in data compression and random string sorting.

Memory support splits the field. AMD supports only DDR5 with dual-channel access and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, plus ECC memory. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, though its bandwidth is not listed in the data. Intel does not support ECC. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), whereas the Intel Core i7-13700F has no integrated graphics. This makes the AMD chip suitable for systems without a discrete GPU, while the Intel part requires one. The Intel processor runs at a 65 W TDP versus AMD’s 28 W, which explains much of the performance gap but also points to different intended use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F wins decisively. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 32101 versus AMD’s 14784, a 53.9% advantage. PassMark multi-thread also favors Intel, 38369 to 26646, a 30.6% lead.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS ever faster than the Intel Core i7-13700F?

A: No. Across all 15 head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel part wins every test. The smallest margin is 10.4% in PassMark single-thread, and the largest is 62% in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: How do the core counts affect the results?

A: Intel’s 16 cores and 24 threads double the core count of AMD’s 8 cores and 16 threads. This explains the large multi-core gaps in Cinebench R23 (53.9%) and floating-point math (44.5%). The single-thread gap is smaller (10.4%) because both chips have similar boost clocks.

Q: What about power consumption?

A: The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel part has a 65 W TDP. That difference explains why Intel performs better in most tests, but it also means the AMD chip is designed for mobile or low-power systems.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. AMD supports only DDR5 with ECC. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 but does not support ECC. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i7-13700F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every major specification category. AMD offers 8 cores and 16 threads; Intel offers 16 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks differ: AMD runs at 3.30 GHz, Intel at 2.10 GHz. Boost clocks are close, with AMD at 5.10 GHz and Intel at 5.20 GHz. TDP shows a stark contrast: AMD at 28 W, Intel at 65 W. The process node favors AMD at 4 nm (TSMC) versus Intel’s 10 nm (Intel). Die size also differs, with AMD at 178 mm² and Intel at 257 mm². Transistor count is listed only for AMD at 25,000 million.

Cache configurations vary: AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is listed for AMD at 89.6 GB/s but not for Intel. ECC support is present on AMD, absent on Intel. PCIe generations differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are present on AMD (Radeon 780M) and absent on Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $359; AMD has no listed launch MSRP. The socket types differ (AMD Socket FP7 vs Intel Socket 1700), and the market segments differ (Mobile vs Desktop). Release dates also differ, with AMD released in April 2024 and Intel in January 2023.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700F wins every benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, so the “wins” for AMD must be interpreted through non-performance attributes. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS wins on power efficiency, with a 28 W TDP versus Intel’s 65 W. That makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops or systems where heat and battery life are priorities. It also wins on integrated graphics, offering Radeon 780M, which eliminates the need for a discrete GPU. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, which is valuable for error-sensitive workloads like scientific computing or servers. Its smaller 4 nm process and 178 mm² die suggest a more compact footprint, though the data does not measure physical size directly.

The Intel Core i7-13700F wins on all measured performance metrics. It excels in multi-threaded rendering, as shown by Cinebench R23 multi-core (32101 vs 14784) and PassMark multi-thread (38369 vs 26646). It also leads in single-thread performance, with a 10.4% edge in PassMark single-thread and a 62% edge in Cinebench R23 single-core. Data-heavy tasks favor Intel: data compression (471838 vs 311199), encryption (26956 vs 18838), and integer math (141370 vs 93342). Intel’s 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores make it the choice for desktop workloads that demand maximum throughput. Its PCIe Gen 5 support also provides higher-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and storage, though the data does not quantify real-world impact.

The Verdict

The choice between these two processors depends entirely on the use case, and the data makes that clear. For any workload where raw performance is the sole criterion, the Intel Core i7-13700F is the only option. It wins all 15 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 10.4% in PassMark single-thread to 62% in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its 16 cores, 24 threads, and 30 MB L3 cache deliver superior results in rendering, math, compression, and encryption. The Intel part’s 65 W TDP and lack of integrated graphics are acceptable trade-offs for a desktop system with a discrete GPU and adequate cooling.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better fit for mobile or power-constrained environments. Its 28 W TDP is less than half of Intel’s, and its integrated Radeon 780M removes the need for a separate GPU. ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive tasks. However, the performance gap is substantial: it loses by 53.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core and by 62% in Cinebench R23 single-core. Users who need a laptop processor with respectable performance will find the AMD chip adequate, but those who need desktop-class speed should look to Intel. The data does not suggest any scenario where the AMD chip outperforms the Intel part on a benchmark, so the verdict is straightforward: Intel for performance, AMD for efficiency and platform flexibility.