AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

The benchmark data presents a clear contrast between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core i5-14490F. The Intel part, a desktop chip, takes the overall win count decisively, while the AMD mobile processor demonstrates specific strengths in a few targeted workloads. The recorded measurements show the Intel Core i5-14490F winning 10 of the 15 head-to-head tests, with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS taking the remaining 5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant difference between the two processors emerges in the Cinebench tests. In the Cinebench R23 multicore test, the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23000 against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 14784, a 35.7% advantage. This is a substantial lead and indicates that the Intel chip maintains a major performance edge in heavily threaded workloads. The gap in single-core performance is even more pronounced in percentage terms. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 3247 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 46.9% higher than the AMD's 1724. Similarly, in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, the Intel processor leads with 327 points against 271.5, a 17% delta.

However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS does secure a win in an older multi-threaded test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the AMD chip scores 2458, which is 6% higher than the Intel's 2318. This is an interesting reversal compared to the R23 multicore result, suggesting a difference in how the two processors scale with the specific workloads of each test version.

The Passmark suite provides a more granular view of their respective strengths. The Intel Core i5-14490F shows its power in several math and physics-based workloads. It achieves a 16.3% lead in floating point math, scoring 66558 versus the AMD's 55739. In the physics test, the Intel chip is dominant, scoring 2093 against the AMD's 1351, a 35.5% advantage. It also leads in prime number finding, with a score of 122 compared to 84, a 31.1% delta. The Intel part is also ahead in the multi-threaded Passmark test, scoring 28662 versus 26646, a 7% difference.

Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS registers wins in several other Passmark sub-tests. It takes a 6.3% lead in integer math, scoring 93342 against the Intel's 87844. It also wins in random string sorting with a 6.5% margin, scoring 37922 to the Intel's 35608. The AMD part is also more efficient in data encryption, scoring 18838 versus 18225, a 3.4% lead, and in extended instructions, where it scores 22298 against 21731, a 2.6% edge. In the data compression test, the Intel chip is ahead, scoring 340026 versus 311199, an 8.5% lead.

In single-threaded Passmark tests, the Intel Core i5-14490F is faster, scoring 3873 compared to the AMD's 3692, a 4.7% difference. This result aligns with the Cinebench R23 single-core data, confirming the Intel chip's superior per-core performance. The data shows a clear pattern: the Intel processor dominates in most compute-intensive tasks, especially those that rely on single-core speed or high-frequency multi-core scaling, while the AMD processor holds its own in specific integer, encryption, and sorting workloads.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core i5-14490F is the stronger performer in the majority of tests. Its wins in Cinebench R23 multicore and single-core by 35.7% and 46.9%, respectively, are the largest deltas recorded. This makes it the clear choice for workloads that are heavily dependent on raw CPU throughput, such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations. Its substantial lead in the Passmark physics test (35.5%) reinforces its suitability for physics-based applications.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, while losing the overall count, is not without merit. Its wins in data encryption (3.4%), integer math (6.3%), and random string sorting (6.5%) suggest it has specialized strengths. Its 6% win in Cinebench R15 multicore shows that it can outperform the Intel chip in certain legacy multi-threaded benchmarks. According to the database, the AMD processor has a higher percentile ranking (87th) versus the Intel's 86th, and a higher average benchmark score of 39603 versus 38149, despite losing the head-to-head. This indicates that the AMD chip's overall profile is competitive, even if the Intel chip wins on specific tests.

The choice between them depends entirely on the primary use case. The Intel Core i5-14490F is the superior option for general heavy-duty processing tasks and any application that benefits from high single-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better pick for scenarios that specifically require its encryption, integer math, and sorting strengths, and where its higher overall average score is more relevant than the specific test wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a significantly higher single-core score of 3247, which is 46.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's score of 1724.

Q: In which benchmark did the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS beat the Intel Core i5-14490F by the largest margin?

A: The AMD processor's largest win was in the Cinebench R15 multicore test, where it scored 2458, a 6% lead over the Intel's 2318.

Q: What is the difference in their multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F is 35.7% faster, scoring 23000 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 14784.

Q: Which processor performs better in the Passmark integer math test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS leads in integer math, scoring 93342, which is 6.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-14490F's score of 87844.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a higher average benchmark score of 39603, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has an average score of 38149.

Q: Which processor wins the Passmark physics test?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F wins the physics test with a score of 2093, which is 35.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's score of 1351.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly in their core configurations and power profiles. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The base clock of the AMD chip is 3.30 GHz, which is higher than the Intel's 2.50 GHz, but the boost clock is similar, with the AMD reaching 5.10 GHz and the Intel reaching 5.00 GHz.

The thermal design power (TDP) is a major point of divergence. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a TDP of 28 watts, whereas the Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 watts. This reflects their different market segments: the AMD is a mobile processor, while the Intel is a desktop processor. They also use different sockets, with the AMD using AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel using Intel Socket 1700.

Their memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has an official memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip's memory bandwidth is not listed in the data. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, a feature the Intel processor does not offer. PCIe support also differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics (N/A). The part numbers are listed as 100-000001353(FP7r2),100-000001381(FP7) for the AMD and SRN35 for the Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architectural designs are fundamentally different. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is based on the Zen 4 architecture, with the codename "Hawk Point". It is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 178 mm². The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically "Raptor Lake-R" from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel and has a larger die size of 215 mm². The transistor count for the AMD chip is listed as 25,000 million, while the Intel chip's transistor count is not listed.

The cache layout also differs. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a larger shared 24 MB of L3 cache. These architectural differences, including the process node, cache sizes, and core organization, contribute to the performance variations seen in the benchmarks. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache and higher core count are factors in its dominant multi-core performance, while the AMD chip's smaller process node and higher base clock are relevant to its efficiency and specific workload wins.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F is the clear winner for applications that demand maximum raw compute power. Its 35.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and 46.9% lead in single-core make it the superior choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, and other tasks that scale with core count and clock speed. Its 35.5% win in the Passmark physics test also makes it the better option for physics simulations and scientific computing workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better choice for specific, specialized workloads. Its wins in data encryption (3.4%) and integer math (6.3%) indicate it may be preferable for cryptographic tasks and certain types of data processing. Its 6.5% win in random string sorting suggests a strength in database and data manipulation tasks. Its higher average benchmark score (39603) and percentile ranking (87th) versus the Intel's (38149 and 86th) also position it as a well-rounded processor. Given its 28-watt TDP and integrated graphics, it is also the more suitable option for a mobile or power-conscious system, as it provides a strong feature set within a lower power envelope.