AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and Intel Core 3 201TE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data in the database reflects a significant performance gap. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, an 8-core mobile processor, is backed by a full suite of benchmark results, while the Intel Core 3 201TE, a 4-core desktop chip, currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of data for the Intel part shapes the entire comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries where both processors were tested under identical conditions. However, the available data for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS provides a detailed picture of its performance, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has an empty benchmark array, meaning no scores are recorded for any workload.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14784 and a single-core score of 1724. In the older Cinebench R15 test, it scores 2458 multi-core and 271.5 single-core. These results indicate a strong dual-threaded and multi-threaded capability for a 28-watt mobile processor.

In PassMark tests, the AMD chip shows consistent strength across various workloads. It scores 93342 in integer math, 55739 in floating point math, and 311199 in data compression. The single-thread PassMark score is 3692, and the multi-thread score is 26646. The data encryption score is 18838, and extended instructions (like AVX) score 22298. Physics simulation scores 1351, and random string sorting scores 37922. The find prime numbers test records a score of 84.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, but this percentile is not supported by any actual test data in the pack. Without scores, the database cannot calculate any head-to-head wins for the Intel chip, and the win counters for both processors are set to 0.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the only processor with measurable wins in this comparison, simply because it is the only one with recorded data. Its benchmark results show it performs well in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14784 and single-core score of 1724 suggest balanced performance for productivity applications that scale across cores and for lightly-threaded workloads.

In the PassMark suite, the AMD chip demonstrates particular strength in integer math (93342) and floating point math (55739), which indicates solid performance for scientific and financial computations. The data compression score of 311199 is notably high, suggesting the processor handles archive management and file compression tasks efficiently. The data encryption score of 18838 shows capable security-related processing.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, with no recorded scores, cannot claim a single benchmark win in this dataset. Its specifications suggest it is a desktop processor with a 45-watt TDP, 4 cores, and 8 threads, but the database lacks any measurement of its actual performance. Therefore, every benchmark category in this comparison falls to the AMD processor by default, not because of direct testing but because no counter-evidence exists for the Intel chip.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS also holds a percentile ranking of 87 among all CPUs in the database, placing it well above the Intel Core 3 201TE's percentile of 50. This percentile difference, while not a direct benchmark score, indicates that the AMD processor outperforms a larger fraction of the database's CPU population than the Intel processor does.

The Verdict

The data in the database strongly favors the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS for anyone seeking a processor with verified performance. The AMD chip delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14784 and a single-core score of 1724, with a robust PassMark multi-thread score of 26646. Its average benchmark score is 39603, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs.

The Intel Core 3 201TE presents a different profile: a desktop part with a higher 45-watt TDP, 4 cores, and 8 threads, but no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile of 50 is unsupported by any test data. Users looking for a desktop processor with a specific socket (Intel Socket 1700) or supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory might consider the Intel part based on its specifications, but the database offers no evidence of its performance capabilities.

Strictly from the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the only processor with measurable performance, and it shows strong results across single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Intel Core 3 201TE cannot be recommended based on benchmark scores, as none exist in the database. The AMD processor also has a higher boost clock (5.10 GHz versus 4.60 GHz), more cores (8 versus 4), and more threads (16 versus 8), which aligns with its superior benchmark showing.

FAQ

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 14784 in Cinebench R23 multi-core testing.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Intel Core 3 201TE has an empty benchmark array, meaning no scores are recorded for any workload.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare to the Intel Core 3 201TE in core count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has an average benchmark score of 39603, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 3 201TE's boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It uses 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The processor features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The integrated graphics are Radeon 780M, and the processor uses AMD Socket FP7.

The Intel Core 3 201TE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The die size is 163 mm², and the cache layout differs: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730, and the socket is Intel Socket 1700.

The two processors also differ in their PCIe support. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both support ECC memory. The AMD processor is marked for the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor is a desktop part. The AMD chip's process node is smaller (4 nm versus 10 nm), and its transistor count is far higher (25,000 million versus none listed for Intel).

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and Intel Core 3 201TE differ across several core specifications. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.30 GHz versus 2.90 GHz for Intel, and the AMD boost clock is 5.10 GHz versus 4.60 GHz for Intel. The TDP is also different: 28 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel.

Memory support diverges, with AMD supporting only DDR5 and Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is higher on the AMD chip at 89.6 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s for Intel. The cache sizes differ in capacity and distribution: AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3 shared; Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB L3 shared.

The integrated graphics are distinct: AMD uses Radeon 780M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The sockets are different, with AMD using Socket FP7 and Intel using Socket 1700. PCIe support differs, with AMD providing Gen 4 with 20 lanes and Intel providing Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The market segments are also different, with AMD targeting mobile devices and Intel targeting desktops. The AMD processor was released on 2024-04-15, while the Intel processor was released on 2025-01-12. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a launch MSRP of $134, which can be stated once as a reference point.