AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 3 201E

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 60W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,458
1,271
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
271.5
179
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
14,784
12,613
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,724
1,780
passmark_data_compression
311,199
164,160
passmark_data_encryption
18,838
8,931
passmark_extended_instructions
22,298
11,035
passmark_find_prime_numbers
84
57
passmark_floating_point_math
55,739
33,260
passmark_integer_math
93,342
43,894
passmark_multithread
26,646
14,839
passmark_physics
1,351
1,141
passmark_random_string_sorting
37,922
17,783
passmark_single_thread
3,692
3,482
passmark_singlethread
3,692
3,482
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
5,297
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
747

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core 3 201E

The benchmark database places the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core 3 201E in different performance classes. Across 15 recorded head-to-head tests, AMD wins 14 and Intel wins 1. The AMD part records an average benchmark score of 39603 and sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part averages 19056 and sits at the 73rd percentile. Those averages put AMD near rivals such as the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 at 39485 and the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D at 39768, while Intel sits near the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 and the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039.

Where Each One Wins

The split is clean. AMD wins every multithreaded test in the direct comparison: Cinebench R15 multicore, Cinebench R23 multicore, and PassMark multithread. It also wins every math-oriented test: PassMark integer math, floating point math, extended instructions, and find prime numbers. Data compression, data encryption, random string sorting, physics, and PassMark single-thread all go to AMD as well.

Intel's only win is Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 1780 against AMD's 1724, a margin of 3.1%. That isolated win does not carry over to other single-thread tests. AMD wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 51.7% and PassMark single-thread by 6%. The data indicates that Intel has a narrow advantage in one specific rendering workload, while AMD dominates the broader workload set.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multithreaded workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. It scores 14784 in Cinebench R23 multicore versus 12613 for the Intel Core 3 201E, a 17.2% lead. The gap is larger in PassMark multithread: 26646 versus 14839, a 79.6% lead, and in Cinebench R15 multicore: 2458 versus 1271, a 93.4% lead.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201E win any benchmark?

A: Yes, one. It wins Cinebench R23 single-core with 1780 against AMD's 1724, a 3.1% margin. AMD wins the other single-thread tests, including PassMark single-thread at 3692 versus 3482 and Cinebench R15 single-core at 271.5 versus 179.

Q: How do the two processors compare by average score and percentile?

A: The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 39603 and ranks at the 87th percentile. The Intel part has an average score of 19056 and ranks at the 73rd percentile. AMD's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 at 39485 with a 0.3% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D at 39768 with a -0.4% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 39325 with a 0.7% delta, and the AMD EPYC 4245P at 39215 with a 1% delta. Intel's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039 with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982 with a 0.4% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979 with a 0.4% delta.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: AMD uses 8 cores and 16 threads; Intel uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part also has a higher boost clock of 5.10 versus 4.80, while the Intel part has a higher base clock of 3.60 versus 3.30.

Q: Which platform differences matter?

A: The AMD part is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7 with a TDP of 28, while the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700 with a TDP of 60. AMD supports DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth; Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head record contains 15 entries, with AMD winning 14. The largest AMD margin is PassMark random string sorting: 37922 versus 17783, a 113.2% lead. PassMark integer math is nearly as large at 112.7%, with 93342 versus 43894. PassMark data encryption shows a 110.9% lead, 18838 versus 8931, and PassMark extended instructions shows 102.1%, 22298 versus 11035.

Cinebench R15 multicore gives AMD a 93.4% lead, 2458 versus 1271. PassMark data compression is 89.6%, 311199 versus 164160. PassMark multithread is 79.6%, 26646 versus 14839. PassMark floating point math is 67.6%, 55739 versus 33260. Cinebench R15 single-core is 51.7%, 271.5 versus 179. PassMark find prime numbers is 47.4%, 84 versus 57. PassMark physics is 18.4%, 1351 versus 1141. Cinebench R23 multicore is 17.2%, 14784 versus 12613.

The smallest AMD win is PassMark single-thread at 6%, 3692 versus 3482. The two PassMark single-thread entries in the database record identical values. Intel's only win is Cinebench R23 single-core: 1780 versus 1724, a 3.1% margin. AMD's lead across its 14 wins ranges from 6% to 113.2%.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS | Intel Core 3 201E |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 8000 series | Not recorded |

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base clock | 3.30 | 3.60 |

| Boost clock | 5.10 | 4.80 |

| TDP | 28 | 60 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not recorded |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die size | 178 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2024-04-15 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $134 |

| Part number | 100-000001353(FP7r2),100-000001381(FP7) | SRVTR |

Architecture Differences

The AMD part is built on Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process and integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel part uses the Bartlett Lake codename and a 10 nm Intel process on a 163 mm² die; no transistor count is recorded for it.

Core layout differs sharply. AMD provides 8 cores and 16 threads, with 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel provides 4 cores and 8 threads, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Intel's per-core caches are larger, but AMD has twice the cores and more shared L3.

Memory and I/O features also differ. AMD supports DDR5 with dual-channel bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are different as well: Radeon 780M on AMD versus UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. AMD's mobile segment and TDP of 28 contrast with Intel's desktop segment and TDP of 60.

The Verdict

The recorded data places the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS in a higher performance band. Its 39603 average score and 87th percentile compare with Intel's 19056 and 73rd percentile. The nearest-rival data reinforces the split: AMD's closest rivals average between 39215 and 39768, while Intel's closest rivals average between 18979 and 19047.

In the direct comparison, AMD wins 14 of 15 tests, with margins from 6% in PassMark single-thread to 113.2% in random string sorting. The Intel Core 3 201E holds one measured advantage: Cinebench R23 single-core, by 3.1%. For multithreaded rendering, math, encryption, compression, sorting, and most single-thread workloads, the AMD part is the stronger part in this dataset. The Intel part's only clear measured advantage is the specific Cinebench R23 single-core workload, and even there the margin is narrow.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 PRO 8840HS
3 201E
Core Specs
Cores
8
4 -50.0%
Threads
16
8 -50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
3.6 +9.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.8 -5.9%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
3.6 +9.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.8 -5.9%
Multiplier
33
36 +9.1%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
60 +114.3%
PL1
60 W
PL2
110 W
Configurable TDP
20-30 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Codename
Hawk Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Core 3 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
Die Size
178 mm²
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$134
Part Number
100-000001353(FP7r2),100-000001381(FP7)
SRVTR
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS Details View Core 3 201E Details