AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U wins every recorded benchmark comparison against the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718. The results are consistent across all six Cinebench tests, with the 5875U holding a narrow but uniform advantage in both single-core and multi-core workloads.

In Cinebench R15, the 5875U scores 1421 in multi-core against 1350 for the V2718, a 5.3% lead. The single-core result shows the same pattern: 200 versus 190, also a 5.3% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core gap remains at 5.3% (5922 versus 5626), while the single-core margin tightens slightly to 5.2% (835 versus 794). Cinebench R23 repeats the story: the 5875U posts 14102 multi-core and 1990 single-core, versus 13396 and 1891 for the V2718, with deltas of 5.3% and 5.2% respectively.

The data shows a consistent, almost mechanical difference. The 5875U does not suddenly pull ahead in one specific test; instead, it maintains a steady 5.2% to 5.3% advantage across the entire Cinebench suite. This suggests the performance gap is structural, not workload-dependent. The V2718 never manages a single win in any recorded benchmark.

For context on overall standing, the 5875U sits at the 57th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 3971. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-6900K, which scores 3970, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 0.2% behind at 3977, while the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U and Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 are both 0.3% ahead at 3958 and 3959 respectively. The V2718 holds the 56th percentile with an average score of 3875. Its closest competitor is the Intel Xeon E-2286M at 3822, which is 1.4% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS sits 1.3% ahead at 3924. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE is 0.8% ahead at 3906, and the Intel Core i7-11700T is 0.3% behind at 3864.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a common foundry and process node but diverge in architecture generation. The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses Zen 3 architecture under the codename Cezanne-U, while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the older Zen 2 architecture under the codename Renoir. Both are built on TSMC's 7 nm process, but the transistor counts differ: the 5875U packs 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, whereas the V2718 has 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die.

Cache configuration is a significant differentiator. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, but the shared L3 cache is doubled on the 5875U: 16 MB shared versus only 8 MB shared on the V2718. This larger L3 cache is a direct consequence of the newer Zen 3 architecture, which reworked the core-to-cache topology.

The integrated graphics also differ. The 5875U features Radeon Vega 8, while the V2718 has Radeon Graphics with 448 SP (stream processors). Both support DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus with identical 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 5875U does not support ECC memory, while the V2718 does. PCIe lane allocation differs as well: the 5875U provides Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the V2718 provides Gen 3 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

The market segments are distinct. The 5875U is classified as a mobile processor, released on 2022-04-18. The V2718 is a desktop-class embedded processor, released earlier on 2020-11-09. Both share the same AMD Socket FP6 and have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U wins in every performance category measured. Its 5.3% multi-core advantage in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 indicates better sustained throughput for heavily threaded workloads. The consistent 5.2% to 5.3% single-core lead matters for responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks, where clock speed and architecture efficiency dominate. The 5875U boosts to 4.50 GHz versus 4.15 GHz for the V2718, and its base clock is higher at 2000 MHz versus 1700 MHz. The newer Zen 3 architecture and doubled L3 cache give it a structural edge that shows up in every test.

The V2718 has no benchmark wins to point to, but it does hold advantages in specific hardware capabilities. It supports ECC memory, which the 5875U does not. This is a critical feature for reliability-sensitive embedded or server-like workloads where memory corruption is unacceptable. The V2718 also offers more PCIe lanes: 20 Gen 3 lanes versus 8 Gen 3 lanes on the 5875U. For embedded applications requiring multiple high-speed add-in cards, NVMe drives, or networking controllers, the extra lanes are a tangible benefit. The V2718 also has a lower thermal design point at 10 W versus 15 W for the 5875U, which can simplify cooling in compact or passively cooled systems.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the recorded data.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 5000 series | 2000 series |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | 1700 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.15 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 10 W |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Cezanne-U | Renoir |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) | Ryzen Embedded (Zen 2 (Renoir)) |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 156 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | Radeon Graphics 448SP |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2022-04-18 | 2020-11-09 |

| Part Number | 100-000000581 | 100-000000242 |

Both chips share the same socket (AMD Socket FP6), core count (8), thread count (16), process node (7 nm), foundry (TSMC), L1 cache (64 KB per core), L2 cache (512 KB per core), memory type (DDR4), memory bus (dual-channel), memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s), and unlocked multiplier status (both locked).

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 14102 versus 13396 for the V2718, a 5.3% lead. The same 5.3% margin appears in Cinebench R15 (1421 versus 1350) and Cinebench R20 (5922 versus 5626).

Q: Is there a single-core performance difference?

A: Yes, the 5875U leads by 5.2% to 5.3% across all single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1990 versus 1891. In Cinebench R20, it scores 835 versus 794.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen Embedded V2718 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U does not. This is a key differentiator for reliability-focused embedded applications.

Q: How do their PCIe capabilities compare?

A: The V2718 has 20 Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the 5875U has only 8 Gen 3 lanes (CPU only). The V2718 provides substantially more connectivity for expansion cards and peripherals.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The V2718 has a TDP of 10 W, while the 5875U has a TDP of 15 W. The V2718 is more power-efficient in terms of rated thermal output, which can matter for compact or passively cooled embedded systems.

Q: Which chip has more L3 cache?

A: The 5875U has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 8 MB shared L3 cache found on the V2718. This larger cache is part of its Zen 3 architecture advantage.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy: the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is the faster processor in every measured benchmark. If raw compute throughput is the primary requirement, the 5875U wins outright, with a consistent 5.2% to 5.3% advantage across all Cinebench tests. Its higher clock speeds, newer Zen 3 architecture, and doubled L3 cache deliver measurable gains in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 57th percentile standing and average benchmark score of 3971 confirm it sits slightly above the V2718's 56th percentile and 3875 average.

The V2718, however, is not without purpose. Its ECC memory support and 20 PCIe Gen 3 lanes make it the more appropriate choice for embedded systems where data integrity and expandability matter more than peak benchmark scores. The lower 10 W TDP also gives it an edge in thermally constrained designs. For a compact network appliance, industrial controller, or storage system that needs ECC and many PCIe devices, the V2718's trade-offs are justified.

The choice comes down to workload priorities. For a general-purpose mobile or desktop system where application speed is king, the 5875U is the better pick. For an embedded deployment where reliability features and I/O flexibility outweigh raw performance, the V2718 is the more sensible option. The benchmark data shows no scenario where the V2718 beats the 5875U in compute, but the specification differences define their respective roles clearly.