AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G

CORE STATE Cezanne
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra X9 388H

CORE STATE Panther Lake
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 25W
ARCHITECTURE Panther Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
295,730
361,763
passmark_data_encryption
19,450
28,490
passmark_extended_instructions
20,487
29,943
passmark_find_prime_numbers
58
358
passmark_floating_point_math
50,778
112,550
passmark_integer_math
90,270
90,882
passmark_multithread
23,858
36,811
passmark_physics
1,022
3,226
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,771
44,010
passmark_single_thread
3,366
4,280
passmark_singlethread
3,366
4,280
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,955
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
309.5
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
13,101
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,849
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
18,911
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
2,200.5

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H come from different market segments but land close in aggregate database standing. The AMD part, a Zen 3 desktop processor on AMD Socket AM4, records an average benchmark score of 49196 and sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel part, a Panther Lake mobile processor on Intel BGA 2540, records 44466 and sits at the 88th percentile. In the direct PassMark head-to-head set, the Intel part wins all 11 comparisons.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data includes eleven PassMark tests. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins every one.

| Test | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | Difference |

|---|---|---|---|

| Data compression | 295730 | 361763 | -18.3% |

| Data encryption | 19450 | 28490 | -31.7% |

| Extended instructions | 20487 | 29943 | -31.6% |

| Find prime numbers | 58 | 358 | -83.8% |

| Floating point math | 50778 | 112550 | -54.9% |

| Integer math | 90270 | 90882 | -0.7% |

| Multithread | 23858 | 36811 | -35.2% |

| Physics | 1022 | 3226 | -68.3% |

| Random string sorting | 32771 | 44010 | -25.5% |

| Single thread | 3366 | 4280 | -21.4% |

| Single thread (alternate record) | 3366 | 4280 | -21.4% |

The largest Intel margin is in find prime numbers, where the AMD part scores 58 and the Intel part scores 358, a gap of 83.8%. Physics follows at 68.3%, with scores of 1022 and 3226. Floating point math shows a 54.9% gap, 50778 versus 112550. The multithread test is 35.2% in Intel's favor, 23858 versus 36811. Data encryption, extended instructions, random string sorting, and single-thread performance all favor Intel by margins between 21.4% and 31.7%. The closest result is integer math, where Intel leads by only 0.7%, 90882 versus 90270. The win count is 0 for AMD and 11 for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

Because the head-to-head set is one-sided, the use-case split is defined by workload type. Intel's largest advantages appear in prime number generation, physics, and floating-point math, which are compute-heavy tasks. Intel also leads in multithread by 35.2%, in encryption by 31.7%, and in extended instructions by 31.6%. AMD's only near-even result is integer math, where the Intel score of 90882 is just 0.7% above AMD's 90270.

The aggregate database metrics, however, favor AMD. The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 49196, compared to Intel's 44466, and a 90th percentile versus 88th. The AMD part's nearest rivals in average score are the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 at 49228, the Intel Core i5-14600KF at 49394, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995, and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H at 48698. The AMD part is 0.1% below the Ryzen 9 7900, 0.4% below the Core i5-14600KF, 0.4% above the Core Ultra 5 245, and 1% above the Xeon Gold 5318H.

The Intel part's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573, the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309, and the Intel Core i5-13600 at 44240. The Intel part is 0.2% below the Ryzen 5 7500X3D, 0.3% above the Core i9-13950HX, 0.4% above the Ryzen AI Max 385, and 0.5% above the Core i5-13600.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built around different architectures. AMD uses Zen 3, codename Cezanne, on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors and a 180 mm² die. Intel uses Panther Lake, built on a 3 nm process at Intel; the database does not list transistor count or die size for Intel.

The core configurations differ in kind. AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel has 16 cores and 16 threads. The cache hierarchy also differs. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses Radeon Vega 8, while Intel uses Arc B390. Memory support follows the platform split. AMD supports DDR4 on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel supports LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus with 153.6 GB/s. The PCIe implementation is also different: AMD uses Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 4 CPU lanes. AMD targets the desktop segment through AMD Socket AM4, while Intel targets the mobile segment through Intel BGA 2540.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Intel Core Ultra X9 388H |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 5000 series | Core Ultra Series 3 |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) | Ultra X9 (Panther Lake-H) |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Cezanne | Panther Lake |

| Process node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not available |

| Die size | 180 mm² | Not available |

| Cores | 8 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.80 | 2.10 |

| Boost clock | 4.60 | 5.10 |

| TDP | 65 | 25 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Cache | L1: 64 KB per core, L2: 512 KB per core, L3: 16 MB | L1: 192 KB per core, L2: 3 MB per core, L3: 18 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR4 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | Arc B390 |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2024-09-04 | 2026-01-04 |

| Part number | 100-000001748 | SA4QWQ9EK |

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the recorded PassMark head-to-head?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins all 11 tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G records no wins. The widest margin is in find prime numbers, 358 versus 58, and the narrowest is in integer math, 90882 versus 90270.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The AMD part records 49196 and the 90th percentile. The Intel part records 44466 and the 88th percentile.

Q: What are the core counts and thread counts?

A: The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has 16 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do the memory types and bandwidth compare?

A: AMD supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s. Intel supports LPDDR5X with 153.6 GB/s. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: AMD uses Radeon Vega 8. Intel uses Arc B390.

Q: What are the base and boost clocks?

A: AMD has a base clock of 3.80 and a boost clock of 4.60. Intel has a base clock of 2.10 and a boost clock of 5.10.

The Verdict

The direct benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins every recorded PassMark comparison. It leads by 83.8% in prime number search, 68.3% in physics, 54.9% in floating-point math, 35.2% in multithread, and 21.4% in single-thread. Its smallest lead is 0.7% in integer math.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, by contrast, holds the higher aggregate benchmark score, 49196 versus 44466, and the higher percentile, 90 versus 88. The AMD part also sits within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and within 0.4% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 in average score. The Intel part sits within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and within 0.5% of the Intel Core i5-13600. For workloads represented by the PassMark subtests, the Intel part is the stronger performer. For overall database standing, the AMD part has the higher average score and percentile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 PRO 5755G
Ultra X9 388H
Core Specs
Cores
8
16 +100.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.8
2.1 -44.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.1 +10.9%
Frequency (GHz)
3.8
2.1 -44.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.1 +10.9%
Multiplier
38
21 -44.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
25 -61.5%
PPT
88 W
—
Configurable TDP
—
15-65 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Panther Lake
Codename
Cezanne
Panther Lake
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Ultra X9 (Panther Lake-H)
Process Size
7 nm
3 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
153.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel BGA 2540
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 4 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
—
1600 MHz up to 4 GHz
LP E-Cores
—
4
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
Arc B390
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001748
SA4QWQ9EK
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-BGA
Tj Max
—
100°C
View Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G Details View Core Ultra X9 388H Details