AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G

CORE STATE Cezanne
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 9 273PQE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
295,730
585,752
passmark_data_encryption
19,450
29,636
passmark_extended_instructions
20,487
38,743
passmark_find_prime_numbers
58
198
passmark_floating_point_math
50,778
125,546
passmark_integer_math
90,270
164,629
passmark_multithread
23,858
46,107
passmark_physics
1,022
2,754
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,771
53,167
passmark_single_thread
3,366
4,573
passmark_singlethread
3,366
4,573
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
3,950
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
557
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
16,459
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
2,323
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
39,190
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
5,532

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core 9 273PQE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and the Intel Core 9 273PQE. Across all eleven shared PassMark tests, the Intel processor wins outright, with zero victories for the AMD part. The largest margin appears in the find prime numbers workload, where Intel scores 198 against AMD's 58, a delta of -70.7% from the AMD perspective. This indicates the Intel chip completes this particular arithmetic task more than three times faster.

Floating point math tells a similar story. The Intel Core 9 273PQE posts 125,546, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G manages 50,778, a -59.6% gap. Physics simulation results follow the same pattern, with Intel at 2,754 versus AMD's 1,022, a -62.9% difference. These three workloads, prime numbers, floating point math, and physics, represent the largest proportional leads for Intel, suggesting its advantage grows in computationally intense, math-heavy scenarios.

Data compression is another area of substantial divergence. Intel scores 585,752 compared to AMD's 295,730, a -49.5% delta. This workload benefits from the Intel processor's larger cache and higher core count, and the result confirms that the throughput advantage is not limited to pure arithmetic. Extended instructions also favor Intel heavily, 38,743 versus 20,487, a -47.1% gap, indicating stronger SIMD and specialized instruction performance.

Integer math shows a -45.2% delta, with Intel at 164,629 and AMD at 90,270. The multithread benchmark, which represents overall parallel performance, gives Intel 46,107 against AMD's 23,858, a -48.3% difference. This near-halving of the AMD score in multithreaded work is consistent with the core and thread disparity between the two parts. Data encryption shows a smaller but still significant gap of -34.4%, with Intel at 29,636 and AMD at 19,450.

Random string sorting is the second-smallest margin on the list. Intel records 53,167, AMD records 32,771, a -38.4% delta. The smallest gap of all appears in single-thread performance, where Intel scores 4,573 and AMD scores 3,366, a -26.4% difference. Even in the workload that most favors the AMD architecture, a Zen 3 design with a high 4.60 GHz boost clock, Intel maintains a comfortable lead.

The average benchmark score reinforces the overall picture. The Intel Core 9 273PQE sits at 66,099, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49,196. In terms of percentile ranking against all CPUs, Intel reaches the 93rd percentile, while AMD sits at the 90th. The nearest rivals for each part confirm their respective tiers: AMD's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with an average score of 49,228 and a delta of -0.1%, essentially identical performance. Intel's closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus at 66,159, a -0.1% delta, also a statistical tie. This places both processors in competitive brackets relative to their peers, but the bracket for Intel is substantially higher.

Where Each One Wins

Given that the Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every shared benchmark, the use-case split is straightforward. The Intel part is the superior choice for multi-threaded productivity workloads, as demonstrated by the multithread score of 46,107, which is nearly double the AMD's 23,858. Applications that rely on parallel execution, such as video rendering, scientific computation, and server-side processing, will see a major advantage from the Intel chip. The physics benchmark, at 2,754 versus 1,022, further supports this, as physics simulations often scale with core count and raw FPU throughput.

Single-threaded applications also favor Intel, albeit by a smaller margin. The 26.4% lead in single-thread performance means that everyday responsiveness, legacy software, and lightly threaded games will run faster on the Intel Core 9 273PQE. The boost clock of 5.90 GHz, compared to AMD's 4.60 GHz, is the likely driver behind this result, and the data confirms that higher clock speeds translate into measurable wins in this test.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, despite losing all benchmarks, still occupies a distinct position. Its 65 W TDP, compared to Intel's 125 W, makes it the more power-conscious option, and its 7 nm TSMC process node suggests better thermal efficiency per watt. For workloads that are not performance-critical, or for systems with strict power and cooling limits, the AMD part remains viable. However, the benchmark data offers no workload category, arithmetic, memory-intensive, or single-threaded, where AMD pulls ahead.

The data compression and encryption results also indicate that the Intel chip is better suited for storage-related tasks and secure communication workloads. Data compression at 585,752 versus 295,730 means faster archive creation and database compression. Encryption at 29,636 versus 19,450 points to quicker VPN throughput and disk encryption operations. In every measurable category, the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the recommended processor for performance-oriented builds.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing generations. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core 9 273PQE, by contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, and offers 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz.

Cache layouts differ considerably. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 on the Intel part, more than double that of AMD, helps explain its dominance in data compression and random string sorting, workloads that benefit from caching large datasets.

Memory support also diverges. AMD supports DDR4 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a peak memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a significantly higher peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This bandwidth advantage is critical for memory-intensive benchmarks like data encryption and floating point math, where data movement often becomes the bottleneck.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. AMD provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The newer PCIe standard on the Intel platform allows for faster connectivity to GPUs and NVMe storage, though this is not directly measured in the PassMark suite. ECC memory support is another differentiator: AMD's chip does not support ECC, while Intel's does, making the Intel part more suitable for error-sensitive server or workstation environments.

Integrated graphics also set the two apart. AMD uses Radeon Vega 8, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither is benchmarked in the shared PassMark tests, but their presence affects platform cost and power draw. The AMD processor is marked as a desktop part with a 65 W TDP, while the Intel processor is also desktop-class but rated at 125 W. The AMD chip uses the AM4 socket, while Intel uses Socket 1700, meaning platform choices are entirely separate.

Process node and foundry differences are notable. AMD's 7 nm TSMC process, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, represents a denser, more power-efficient design. Intel's 10 nm process has no listed transistor count or die size in the database, but the higher TDP and larger cache suggest a different tradeoff between power and performance. The AMD part was released in September 2024, while the Intel part is dated March 2026, giving Intel an additional generation of design time.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The Intel Core 9 273PQE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G in every benchmark category recorded, with margins ranging from 26.4% in single-thread work to 70.7% in prime number calculation. For any user prioritizing raw performance, the Intel chip is the correct selection. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, larger caches, higher memory bandwidth, and faster boost clock combine to produce an average score of 66,099, which places it 34.3% above AMD's 49,196.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G retains relevance only in power-constrained scenarios. Its 65 W TDP is roughly half of Intel's 125 W, and its 7 nm process node indicates superior efficiency per watt. For compact desktop builds, low-power servers, or silent workstation configurations, the AMD part offers acceptable performance with significantly lower power draw. However, no benchmark in the database shows AMD winning, so any performance-critical decision must favor Intel.

The nearest rival data places both processors in competitive positions relative to their own peers. AMD's closest rival, the Ryzen 9 7900, scores 49,228, just 0.1% above the 5755G, confirming that the AMD chip is well-matched to its class. Intel's closest rival, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, scores 66,159, only 0.1% above the 273PQE, showing that the Intel chip also sits at the top of its bracket. The gap between the two brackets, however, is substantial and consistent across all tests.

For a buyer choosing between these two specific parts, the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the clear winner. The launch MSRP of the Intel part is $589, and it delivers roughly double the multithreaded performance of the AMD chip. The AMD part has no listed launch MSRP in the database, making direct price comparison impossible, but the performance data alone justifies the conclusion. The Intel chip is faster in every measured metric, and its additional features, including ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5, and DDR5 compatibility, make it the more future-proof platform.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 4,573 in the PassMark single-thread test, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G's 3,366, a 26.4% advantage for Intel.

Q: How large is the multithread performance gap?

A: Intel scores 46,107 in the PassMark multithread test, while AMD scores 23,858, giving Intel a 48.3% lead.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel chip supports up to 89.6 GB/s with DDR5, while the AMD chip supports up to 51.2 GB/s with DDR4 only.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE boosts to 5.90 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G's 4.60 GHz.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66,099, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49,196, a difference of roughly 34%.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Intel Core 9 273PQE |

|----------------|----------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 125 W |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Release Date | 2024-09-04 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $589 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 PRO 5755G
9 273PQE
Core Specs
Cores
8
12 +50.0%
Threads
16
24 +50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.8
3.4 -10.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.9 +28.3%
Frequency (GHz)
3.8
3.4 -10.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.9 +28.3%
Multiplier
38
34 -10.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
36 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
125 +92.3%
PL1
—
253 W
PL2
—
253 W
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
—
Codename
Cezanne
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Core 9 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
—
5.5 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$589
Part Number
100-000001748
SA4Q9
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
—
100°C
View Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G Details View Core 9 273PQE Details