AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clear split between multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scores 658 against the Intel Processor N150's 422.5, a decisive 55.7% advantage for AMD. This is the largest margin in the comparison and reflects the AMD part's ability to leverage simultaneous multithreading. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel Processor N150 takes the win with a score of 153.15 versus 149 for AMD, a 2.7% edge. That is a modest margin, but it is consistent across the recorded data.

The average benchmark scores tell a similar story of near parity. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U posts an average benchmark score of 1041, while the Intel Processor N150 sits at 1025. The delta between the two is only 1.6%, well within the range of their nearest rivals. For context, the AMD part's closest rival, the Intel Core i3-4160T, scores 1043, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Processor N150's closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, scores 1024, a delta of 0.1%. Both processors occupy the same performance tier, with the AMD part ranking in the 29th percentile of all CPUs and the Intel part in the 28th percentile.

Geekbench results were recorded for the AMD part but not for the Intel part in this dataset. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scores 2567 in Geekbench multi-core and 790 in Geekbench single-core. The Intel Processor N150's Cinebench R23 scores are recorded: 2590.5 multi-core and 935 single-core. These cannot be directly compared across different benchmark suites, but they each indicate a capable low-power mobile processor.

The win count is even at one each: AMD wins one head-to-head test, Intel wins one. The decisive factor is workload type. Multi-threaded rendering favors AMD heavily. Single-threaded responsiveness favors Intel slightly.

The Verdict

The data points to a simple conclusion: choose the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U if your workloads are multi-threaded and you need the highest throughput in CPU-bound rendering or compilation tasks. Its 55.7% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core is the single biggest differentiator between these two parts. The Intel Processor N150 is the better pick for single-threaded performance, where it leads by 2.7%, and for situations requiring a dramatically lower power envelope.

However, the average benchmark scores indicate that neither part is a runaway winner. The AMD part's 1041 average is only 1.6% above the Intel part's 1025. Both fall into the same performance class, surrounded by rivals like the Intel Core i3-4160T (1043, -0.2% from AMD) and the Intel Core i7-4558U (1038, 0.3% from AMD). The Intel Processor N150's nearest rivals include the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (1024, 0.1%) and the Intel Core i3-4340 (1026, -0.1%). These deltas are essentially negligible, meaning the recorded performance difference between the two processors is small in absolute terms.

The Intel Processor N150 also distinguishes itself through its 6 watt TDP compared to AMD's 15 watts. That is a 9 watt difference, which in a mobile context can translate to longer battery life and lighter cooling requirements. The AMD part, with its 15 watt TDP, has more thermal headroom for sustained multi-core loads but will require more substantial cooling.

For users who prioritize raw multi-core compute, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is the clear choice from the data. For users who prioritize single-core speed and extreme power efficiency, the Intel Processor N150 is the better fit. Neither part is a universal winner.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U wins in:

• Multi-threaded rendering: 55.7% ahead in Cinebench R15 multi-core.
• Overall average benchmark score: 1041 versus 1025, a 1.6% lead.
• Thread count: 8 threads versus 4 threads, which underpins its multi-core advantage.
• Memory bandwidth potential: dual-channel memory bus versus single-channel on the Intel part.
• Larger L2 cache: 512 KB per core versus 2 MB shared across all four cores on Intel, which affects per-core data locality.

Intel Processor N150 wins in:

• Single-threaded performance: 2.7% ahead in Cinebench R15 single-core.
• Power efficiency: 6 watt TDP versus 15 watts, a 60% reduction in rated power draw.
• Newer Cinebench R23 results: 2590.5 multi-core and 935 single-core, demonstrating current-generation capability.
• L3 cache capacity: 6 MB shared versus 4 MB shared on AMD.
• Memory flexibility: supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, while AMD supports only DDR4.
• Higher memory bandwidth figure: 38.4 GB/s recorded for Intel, no equivalent figure recorded for AMD.

The use-case split is clean. The AMD part suits compact laptops or mini PCs where multi-core performance matters and a 15 watt TDP is acceptable. The Intel part suits fanless or ultra-low-power designs where single-core responsiveness and minimal power draw are priorities.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, by a margin of 55.7% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (658 versus 422.5).

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core benchmarks?

A: The Intel Processor N150, by 2.7% in Cinebench R15 single-core (153.15 versus 149).

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U has an average benchmark score of 1041, while the Intel Processor N150 scores 1025. That is a 1.6% difference in favor of AMD.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores?

A: Yes, both have 4 cores. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U supports 8 threads, while the Intel Processor N150 supports 4 threads.

Q: What are their power ratings?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U has a 15 watt TDP. The Intel Processor N150 has a 6 watt TDP.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U ranks in the 29th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor N150 ranks in the 28th percentile. The difference is one percentage point.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is built on the Zen+ architecture with the codename Picasso, part of the 3000 series. It uses a 12 nm process node from GlobalFoundries and contains 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Processor N150 is built on the Twin Lake architecture with the same codename, and it uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. No transistor count or die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD part has 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part also has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, but its L2 cache is 2 MB shared across all cores, and its L3 cache is 6 MB shared. The AMD layout favors per-core cache access, while the Intel layout provides a larger pool of shared L3.

The AMD part integrates Radeon Vega 10 graphics, while the Intel part integrates UHD Graphics 730. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR4 only, with a dual-channel bus, while Intel supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, with a single-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. Both processors support PCIe Gen 3, though the Intel part specifies 9 lanes from the CPU. Neither part supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The AMD part's generation is listed as Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Picasso)), while the Intel part's generation is listed as Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N). The release dates are far apart: the AMD part was released in April 2019, and the Intel part in November 2024. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1264.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U | Intel Processor N150 |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base clock | 2.30 GHz | 0.10 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.00 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 6 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Architecture | Zen+ | Twin Lake |

| Process node | 12 nm | 10 nm |

| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | Not recorded | 38.4 GB/s |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Vega 10 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Part number | YM370BC4T4MFG | SRPNR |

The base clock difference is notable: the AMD part has a 2.30 GHz base clock, while the Intel part has a 0.10 GHz base clock. The boost clocks are closer, with AMD at 4.00 GHz and Intel at 3.60 GHz. The Intel part's very low base clock is characteristic of an ultra-low-power design, allowing it to idle at minimal frequencies and conserve power, which aligns with its 6 watt TDP.