AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Intel Xeon E-2286G Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Intel Xeon E-2286G are both professional-grade processors, but benchmark results show a clear and consistent pattern. Across the entire Cinebench suite, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2286G in every single test, demonstrating a definitive edge in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Xeon E-2286G, while a capable part, does not manage a single victory in the head-to-head comparisons, making the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 the stronger choice based purely on the data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking finding is the consistency of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s victory. It wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with a lead of 5.1% or more in every test. This is not a narrow win in one specific area; it is a sweeping dominance across the board.

Starting with multi-core performance, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s advantage is clear. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 1259 against the Xeon E-2286G’s 1198, a 5.1% lead. This pattern continues in Cinebench R20 multicore, where the AMD part posts 5246 versus 4993, again a 5.1% delta. The gap persists in the more demanding Cinebench R23 multicore test, with scores of 12491 and 11889, respectively, for another 5.1% advantage. The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide a tangible advantage over the Xeon’s 6 cores and 12 threads in heavily parallelized tasks.

The single-core results are arguably more surprising. While the Xeon E-2286G has a significantly higher base clock of 4.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to the Ryzen’s 3.00 GHz and 3.70 GHz, the AMD processor still pulls ahead. In Cinebench R15 singlecore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 177 versus 168, a 5.4% lead. This trend holds in Cinebench R20 singlecore, with scores of 740 and 704, a 5.1% difference. The final test, Cinebench R23 singlecore, shows the AMD part scoring 1763 against the Intel’s 1678, another 5.1% margin. This suggests that the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s architecture is more efficient in executing single-threaded instructions, overcoming the Xeon’s raw clock speed advantage.

Examining the average benchmark scores places these two in the same tier. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has an average benchmark score of 3613, while the Xeon E-2286G is slightly behind at 3610. Both are listed in each other's nearestRivals, with a deltaPct of only 0.1%, indicating they are extremely close competitors in overall performance. The Xeon E-2286G also has Geekbench scores of 6651 multicore and 1598 singlecore in its records, but there are no corresponding Geekbench results for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 in the data pack, so a direct comparison on that platform cannot be made. However, the Cinebench suite, which is present for both, provides a comprehensive and consistent picture: the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the clear winner.

The Verdict

From the benchmark data, the verdict is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the superior processor. It wins every head-to-head comparison, holding a 5.1% lead in multi-core tests and a 5.1% to 5.4% lead in single-core tests. Anyone looking for a CPU for a desktop workstation should choose the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 over the Intel Xeon E-2286G.

The Intel Xeon E-2286G, despite its higher clock speeds, cannot match the performance of the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. The Xeon’s single-core deficit is particularly noteworthy, as it fails to leverage its 4.90 GHz boost clock to win any of the single-threaded tests. This indicates that the Zen architecture of the AMD processor is more effective at executing instructions per clock cycle. The Xeon E-2286G is also listed as end-of-life, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is still active in production, which makes the Intel part a less forward-looking investment.

The data does not support choosing the Xeon E-2286G on performance grounds. For professional workloads where Cinebench scores are representative, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 offers a consistent and meaningful performance advantage. The verdict is clear: pick the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins in every measurable category. It is the better choice for both multi-threaded and single-threaded applications.

For multi-threaded workloads, such as video rendering, 3D modeling, or compiling large codebases, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s advantage in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests makes it the clear winner. The 5.1% lead in all three tests indicates a robust and consistent edge in parallel processing. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide more raw processing power than the Xeon’s 6 cores and 12 threads.

For single-threaded workloads, like legacy applications or tasks that depend on a single core, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 also wins. Its 5.1% to 5.4% lead in the single-core Cinebench tests is unexpected given the Xeon’s higher clock speeds, but the data is clear. This makes the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 the better choice for users who need a balance of both multi-tasking and responsive single-thread performance.

There is no area where the Intel Xeon E-2286G wins according to the head-to-head benchmark data. While it does have an integrated GPU, the HD Graphics P630, whereas the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has no integrated graphics, this does not translate to a performance win in the CPU benchmarks. The Xeon E-2286G is a capable processor, but the data shows the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the superior choice for all use cases presented.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has better multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is better. It wins all multi-core Cinebench tests: R15 (1259 vs 1198), R20 (5246 vs 4993), and R23 (12491 vs 11889), each with a 5.1% lead over the Intel Xeon E-2286G.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2286G win in any benchmark test?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel Xeon E-2286G wins 0 tests, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins all 6 tests.

Q: Which CPU has a higher single-core score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has higher single-core scores. In Cinebench R15, it scores 177 vs 168 (a 5.4% lead), and in Cinebench R20 and R23, it scores 740 vs 704 and 1763 vs 1678, respectively, for a 5.1% lead in each.

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare between the two?

A: The average benchmark scores are very close. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has an average score of 3613, while the Intel Xeon E-2286G has an average score of 3610. They are listed as nearest rivals with a deltaPct of only 0.1%.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2286G have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E-2286G has integrated graphics, specifically the HD Graphics P630. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 does not have integrated graphics.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a production status of "Active", while the Intel Xeon E-2286G is listed as "End-of-life".

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures, which explains their performance characteristics. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is based on the Zen architecture, codenamed "Summit Ridge", and is manufactured on a 14 nm process by GlobalFoundries. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache.

The Intel Xeon E-2286G is based on the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant, and is manufactured on a 14 nm process by Intel. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Its cache structure is different, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache.

A key difference is the transistor count and die size. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 4,800 million transistors on a 213 mm² die. In contrast, the Intel Xeon E-2286G does not have a listed transistor count, but its die size is significantly smaller at 154 mm². This suggests a denser but less complex design for the Intel part.

The sockets are also incompatible. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel Xeon E-2286G uses the Intel Socket 1151. Both support DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and have a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and both support ECC memory. They also both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Xeon E-2286G includes the HD Graphics P630 integrated GPU, a feature absent from the AMD part. The launch MSRP for the Intel Xeon E-2286G is $450.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has an unlocked multiplier, while the Xeon E-2286G is locked, which allows for more flexible overclocking on the AMD platform. These architectural differences, particularly the higher core count and larger L3 cache of the AMD part, are the likely drivers of its consistent benchmark victory over the higher-clocked Intel Xeon.