AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 sits at the 58th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 3613. This places it in a tightly contested performance tier where a single point separates it from its closest rivals. The data indicates a processor that delivers balanced, mainstream performance rather than segment-leading results, making it a dependable choice for professional desktop workloads that benefit from eight cores and sixteen threads.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s benchmark results paint a picture of consistent multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 12491 in multi-core and 1763 in single-core. The multi-core figure represents the bulk of its compute potential, while the single-core score reveals a more modest level of per-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 5246 multi-core and 740 single-core, and in the older R15 test, it achieves 1259 multi-core and 177 single-core.

Against its nearest rivals, the performance deltas are razor-thin. The Intel Xeon E-2286G posts an average score of 3614, a 0% delta from the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, meaning the two processors are effectively identical in aggregate benchmark performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U scores 3610, trailing by 0.1%, while the Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 achieves 3605, a 0.2% gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E rounds out the group with 3603, sitting 0.3% behind.

These tiny margins indicate that the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is not a performance outlier in either direction. It holds its own against a Xeon workstation chip, a modern mobile processor, and an older server-class part. The average benchmark score of 3613 confirms that no single rival decisively beats it; instead, the entire cluster of CPUs operates within a 11-point range. For users prioritizing predictable multi-core throughput, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 delivers results squarely in line with its peers.

Power and Thermals

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 carries a 65-watt TDP, a figure that places it in a modest power class for an eight-core desktop processor. This TDP level implies that a capable air cooler is sufficient for sustained operation, as the thermal load remains manageable under typical workloads. The 14 nm process node from GlobalFoundries contributes to this efficiency profile, balancing transistor density with power draw.

The 65-watt TDP also positions the processor favorably for compact workstation builds or office environments where noise and heat output are considerations. Unlike high-TDP parts that demand robust liquid cooling or large tower heatsinks, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s thermal requirements are unassuming. Benchmark results indicate that the processor can maintain its performance envelope without exotic cooling solutions, making it a practical fit for standard desktop chassis.

Who Should Consider It

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 targets users who need consistent multi-threaded performance without venturing into high-end workstation pricing tiers. Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12491 indicative of solid throughput for tasks that scale across all 16 threads. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration ensures that multi-threaded applications see meaningful parallelism, though the single-core score of 1763 in R23 suggests that lightly threaded workloads will not achieve standout results.

For office productivity and general desktop use, the processor is more than adequate, but its strengths lie in batch processing and compilation workloads rather than interactive single-thread responsiveness. Gamers should note that the single-core performance, while competent, is not class-leading; the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, but it also will not elevate frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The data supports a recommendation for professionals who run parallel workloads and require a stable, efficient platform with ECC memory support.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, a socket that provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature valuable for workstations that demand data integrity. PCIe connectivity is Gen 3 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, sufficient for a single high-end GPU or multiple NVMe drives via the chipset.

The Zen (Summit Ridge) architecture, built on a 14 nm process with 4,800 million transistors on a 213 mm² die, defines the processor’s capabilities. The cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, enabling overclocking for users who wish to push beyond the 3.00 GHz base and 3.70 GHz boost clocks. The part number YD170BBBM88AE identifies this specific SKU, and production status remains active.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 have?

A: It has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 3.70 GHz, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

Q: Does it support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the TDP?

A: The TDP is 65 watts.

Q: What socket does it use?

A: It uses AMD Socket AM4.

Q: What is its average benchmark score compared to the Intel Xeon E-2286G?

A: The average score is 3613, which is 0% different from the Intel Xeon E-2286G’s 3614.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The split between single-thread and multi-thread performance is stark and defines the processor’s character. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 12491 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 1763, a ratio that highlights strong scaling across the 16 threads. This scaling indicates that the Zen architecture’s core count is the primary asset; applications that can utilize all threads will see substantial throughput gains.

Conversely, the single-core score of 1763 in R23 reveals a more conservative per-thread capability. This limits performance in tasks like spreadsheet recalculation, certain database queries, or legacy software that relies on a single thread. The R15 results mirror this pattern: 1259 multi-core versus 177 single-core, yielding a similar ratio. Users should expect the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 to excel in parallel workloads such as rendering, code compilation, and scientific simulations, while accepting that single-threaded tasks will not showcase its strengths.

How It Compares

Intel Xeon E-2286G: The Xeon E-2286G posts an average score of 3614, a 0% delta from the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. This equivalence means that in aggregate benchmarks, the two processors are interchangeable. The Xeon may offer different platform features, but raw CPU performance is statistically identical.

AMD Ryzen 5 5625U: With an average score of 3610, the Ryzen 5 5625U trails by 0.1%. This mobile-oriented part comes remarkably close to the desktop Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, suggesting that modern efficiency gains have closed the gap between mobile and desktop tiers. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 still leads, but the margin is negligible.

Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3: The Xeon E5-2678 v3 scores 3605, a 0.2% deficit. This older server processor, likely with a higher core count, matches the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 in overall benchmark performance. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700’s newer architecture compensates for any core count disadvantage, resulting in near-identical aggregate scores.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E: The Ryzen 7 2700E achieves 3603, sitting 0.3% behind. This is the largest gap in the rival group, yet it remains within a single percentage point. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 edges out this sibling part, reinforcing its position as a solid mid-tier performer in the AMD lineup.