AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Intel Xeon E-2276G Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2276G and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 are closely matched processors, with average benchmark scores of 3614 and 3613 respectively, resulting in a 0% performance delta between them. Both CPUs sit at the 55th percentile of all processors tested, indicating they occupy nearly identical positions in the overall performance landscape despite their different architectures and market segments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data reveals a consistent pattern: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins every single test in the comparison, though by remarkably narrow margins. Across all six benchmark suites, the AMD processor maintains a lead of approximately 4.3% to 4.5% over the Intel Xeon E-2276G, a gap that remains remarkably stable regardless of workload type or benchmark generation.

In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 1259 against the Xeon's 1205, a 4.3% advantage. The single-core version of the same benchmark shows a slightly larger gap, with the AMD part scoring 177 versus Intel's 169, representing a 4.5% lead. This pattern persists in Cinebench R20, where the multicore scores are 5246 for AMD and 5021 for Intel (4.3% delta), and single-core results are 740 versus 708 (4.3% delta).

The most recent Cinebench R23 results continue the trend. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 achieves 12491 in multicore performance compared to the Xeon E-2276G's 11957, while the single-core scores are 1763 and 1688 respectively. Both R23 deltas sit at 4.3%. Notably, the Geekbench results are not included in the head-to-head comparison, but the average benchmark scores for both processors are within 1 point of each other, suggesting the overall picture remains balanced.

What makes these results particularly interesting is that the Intel Xeon E-2276G has a significantly higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to the AMD's 3.70 GHz, yet it still loses in single-core performance. The data suggests that architectural efficiency and core count play a more significant role than raw clock speed in these workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G has an average benchmark score of 3614, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 3613, resulting in a 0% difference between the two.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 12491, which is 4.3% higher than the Intel Xeon E-2276G's score of 11957.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2276G and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G is marked as end-of-life, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is listed as active in production.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G includes HD Graphics P630, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 does not have integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2276G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process at Intel's foundry. Its die size is 154 mm², and it belongs to the Xeon E-2200 series, targeting the server and workstation market segment. The architecture is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, with a generation designation of "Xeon E (Coffee Lake)."

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 employs the Zen architecture from the 1000 series, also on a 14 nm process but manufactured at GlobalFoundries. Its die is substantially larger at 213 mm² and contains 4,800 million transistors, whereas the Intel chip's transistor count is not specified in the data. The AMD processor uses the Zen (Summit Ridge) codename and targets the desktop market segment.

Cache configurations differ notably between the two. The Intel processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD design offers more cache at every level: 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger cache hierarchy likely contributes to the AMD processor's consistent benchmark advantage.

Both processors support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses and identical 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth. They also share the same PCIe configuration: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses Socket 1151, while the AMD processor uses Socket AM4, making them incompatible with each other's platforms.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows a clear, if narrow, winner: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2276G in every head-to-head test. The margin is consistent at around 4.3% to 4.5% across all Cinebench versions, which indicates this is a genuine architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific anomaly.

However, the overall average benchmark scores tell a slightly different story. With scores of 3614 and 3613, the two processors are statistically tied, differing by only 0.1% at most. This suggests that outside the specific Cinebench tests, the Intel processor may find workloads where its higher clock speeds and different architecture close the gap.

For buyers prioritizing raw multi-threaded performance in rendering or compute workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the data-backed choice. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide 33% more cores than the Intel's 6 cores and 12 threads, and this advantage shows in every multicore test. The Intel Xeon E-2276G, despite being end-of-life, still offers competitive performance with a 4.90 GHz boost clock and integrated graphics support, which could be decisive for systems requiring a GPU without a separate graphics card.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across almost every specification category. The Intel Xeon E-2276G features 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 offers 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks stand at 3.80 GHz for Intel and 3.00 GHz for AMD, with boost clocks of 4.90 GHz and 3.70 GHz respectively. The Intel processor has a TDP of 80 watts, while the AMD part is rated at 65 watts.

Socket compatibility is completely different: the Intel uses Socket 1151, while the AMD uses Socket AM4. The Intel part is not multiplier unlocked, but the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 comes with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Production status also differs, with the Intel Xeon marked as end-of-life and the AMD processor still active.

The Intel Xeon E-2276G includes HD Graphics P630 integrated graphics, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has no integrated graphics. The Intel processor's launch MSRP was $362, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part. The Intel chip has a die size of 154 mm², while the AMD processor measures 213 mm² and contains 4,800 million transistors. Cache configurations differ, with the AMD part providing more L1 (96 KB vs 64 KB per core), L2 (512 KB vs 256 KB per core), and L3 (16 MB vs 12 MB shared) cache.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins in every benchmark category included in the head-to-head comparison. It achieves 4.3% higher scores in Cinebench R15 multicore (1259 vs 1205), R20 multicore (5246 vs 5021), and R23 multicore (12491 vs 11957). The single-core results show the same pattern, with the AMD part ahead by 4.5% in R15 (177 vs 169) and 4.3% in both R20 (740 vs 708) and R23 (1763 vs 1688).

The Intel Xeon E-2276G does not win any of the six recorded head-to-head benchmarks. Its strengths lie elsewhere: the integrated HD Graphics P630 eliminates the need for a separate GPU in basic display scenarios, and its higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz may benefit workloads not captured in the Cinebench suite. The Intel processor also carries the Xeon branding, which typically indicates enhanced validation for server and workstation environments, and its 80-watt TDP, while higher than AMD's 65 watts, still represents a moderate power envelope.

For users choosing between these two, the data suggests the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the stronger performer in rendering and compute tasks, particularly those that scale with core count. The Intel Xeon E-2276G remains a viable option for systems requiring integrated graphics or for environments where the Xeon platform's specific features are necessary, though its end-of-life status may limit future availability.