AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Intel Core i3-13100E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a remarkably consistent picture: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins every single head-to-head comparison, yet the margins are surprisingly narrow given the architectural gap. Across all six Cinebench tests, the AMD part leads by a uniform 6.2% to 6.3% — a pattern that suggests the performance difference stems from a systematic advantage rather than workload-specific strengths.

In multi-core workloads, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 posts a Cinebench R23 score of 12,491 against the Core i3-13100E's 11,710, a 6.3% advantage. The same margin appears in Cinebench R20 (5,246 vs 4,918) and Cinebench R15 (1,259 vs 1,180). What is striking here is that the AMD chip achieves this with eight cores and sixteen threads versus the Intel part's four cores and eight threads — yet the performance gap is only 6.3%. This implies that the Core i3's newer architecture is doing substantial work to compensate for having half the physical cores.

Single-core results tell a similar story. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 leads by 6.2% in Cinebench R23 single-core (1,763 vs 1,653), R20 single-core (740 vs 694), and R15 single-core (177 vs 166). This is the more surprising result: a 2017 Zen part beating a 2023 Raptor Lake chip in single-threaded performance. The data suggests the Core i3's 4.40 GHz boost clock does not translate into faster single-thread execution than the Ryzen's 3.70 GHz boost — a finding that challenges the assumption that higher clocks and a newer microarchitecture automatically win.

The aggregate figures reinforce the head-to-head picture. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 carries an average benchmark score of 3,613, placing it in the 55th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i3-13100E averages 3,668 and sits in the 56th percentile. Despite losing every direct comparison, the Intel part actually has a slightly higher average score and percentile — likely because the Geekbench results are included in its average but not in the head-to-head set. This discrepancy raises a question: does the Intel chip close the gap in Geekbench, a test absent from the head-to-head table? The data alone cannot answer that, but it does show that overall standing is not identical to direct comparison results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from opposite ends of the design spectrum. The Intel Core i3-13100E is built on Raptor Lake architecture, using a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry, with a die size of 163 mm². The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the original Zen microarchitecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a substantially larger die at 213 mm² and 4,800 million transistors. The process node difference alone — 10 nm versus 14 nm — would normally suggest a significant efficiency and density advantage for Intel, yet the benchmark results do not reflect a corresponding performance lead.

Core and thread counts diverge sharply. The Intel part offers 4 cores and 8 threads; the AMD part doubles both to 8 cores and 16 threads. Cache hierarchies also differ: the Core i3 provides 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, while the Ryzen 7 PRO offers 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. At the L3 level, the Intel chip has 12 MB shared, whereas the AMD chip has 16 MB shared — a 33% larger pool that likely helps the Ryzen in multi-threaded scenarios.

Memory support reflects their respective eras. The Core i3-13100E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is limited to DDR4, also dual-channel, with a rated memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The Intel part also brings PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, versus the AMD part's PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes — a generational leap in interconnect speed.

Integrated graphics mark another divide. The Core i3-13100E includes UHD Graphics 730, making it a complete package for systems without a discrete GPU. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has no integrated graphics at all, requiring a separate graphics card. Both processors support ECC memory, which positions them for workstation or server duty. The Intel chip has a locked multiplier; the AMD chip is unlocked for overclocking. Their sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket AM4.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in every head-to-head benchmark?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins all six Cinebench comparisons — R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core — with a consistent 6.2% to 6.3% margin over the Intel Core i3-13100E.

Q: Does the Core i3-13100E have any benchmark advantage at all?

A: In the head-to-head data, no. However, its average benchmark score of 3,668 is higher than the Ryzen's 3,613, and its 56th percentile ranking edges the Ryzen's 55th percentile. This suggests the Intel part performs better in benchmarks outside the six Cinebench tests, such as Geekbench.

Q: How does core count affect the results?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 8 cores and 16 threads versus the Core i3's 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite this 2x core advantage, the Ryzen leads by only about 6.3% in multi-core tests, indicating the Intel architecture's per-core efficiency partially compensates for its lower core count.

Q: Which processor has newer memory support?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports only DDR4. The Intel part also offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity versus the AMD part's PCIe Gen 3.

Q: Can either processor use ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-13100E and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 support ECC memory, making both viable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: Only the Intel Core i3-13100E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-13100E | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| TDP | 60 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | Not specified | 4,800 million |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 213 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 42.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | None |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2017-06-28 |

| Launch MSRP | $480 | Not available |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | SRMFR | YD170BBBM88AE |

The Verdict

The data directs a clear if counterintuitive conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the faster processor in every measured Cinebench workload, despite being six years older, built on an older process, and having a lower boost clock. The consistency of the 6.2%–6.3% margin across all tests indicates a stable performance advantage, not a workload-specific fluke.

That said, the Intel Core i3-13100E holds its own in overall standing. Its average benchmark score of 3,668 exceeds the Ryzen's 3,613, and its 56th percentile versus 55th suggests that in the broader benchmark universe, the Intel chip may actually be the stronger all-round performer. The head-to-head data simply does not include those tests.

The choice between these two depends on what the data emphasizes. For users prioritizing raw Cinebench rendering performance, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the pick — it wins every direct comparison. For users who value modern platform features — DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 5, integrated graphics, and a newer process node — the Core i3-13100E offers capabilities the AMD part cannot match. The Ryzen counters with double the cores, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and a larger L3 cache.

The verdict is not a sweep for either side. The Ryzen wins on benchmark performance; the Intel wins on platform modernity and aggregate score. Neither processor dominates the other across every relevant metric, and the data supports choosing based on workload priorities rather than a single overall winner.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins in every Cinebench scenario recorded: multi-core rendering across R15, R20, and R23, and single-core rendering in the same three tests. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration and 16 MB of L3 cache give it a measurable edge in threaded workloads, while its single-core results — leading by 6.2% — show the older Zen architecture still delivers competitive per-thread performance. Users running Cinebench-style rendering, video encoding, or any multi-threaded compute task should favor the Ryzen based on this data.

The Intel Core i3-13100E wins outside the head-to-head tests. Its higher average benchmark score (3,668 vs 3,613) and better percentile ranking (56th vs 55th) imply it performs relatively better in Geekbench or other benchmarks not included in the direct comparison. Its platform advantages are substantial: DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and integrated UHD Graphics 730 eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems. The 10 nm process and 60 W TDP also suggest better power efficiency, though the data does not include direct power measurements.

The split is clean. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the benchmark winner in every head-to-head test, making it the choice for pure compute performance. The Core i3-13100E is the modern platform winner, offering newer memory, faster PCIe, integrated graphics, and a higher aggregate benchmark score — making it the more versatile foundation for a system where rendering is not the sole priority. Each processor wins where its strengths are measured; the data simply measures different strengths in different places.