AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Intel Core i3-12300T Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data presents a strikingly one-sided picture. Based on the six Cinebench comparisons in the database, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins every single test, taking all six head-to-head matchups. The Intel Core i3-12300T does not register a single win in any of the measured workloads, whether those workloads stress a single core or all available cores.

The use-case split, however, is not about which processor wins a given category, but rather about which processor is better suited for which type of workload despite its losses. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 shows its advantage in multi-threaded scenarios, where its 8 cores and 16 threads allow it to pull ahead of the 4-core, 8-thread Intel part. The Cinebench R23 multicore test shows the AMD part scoring 12,491 against the Intel's 11,118, a difference of 12.3 percent.

The single-core results tell a more nuanced story. While the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 still wins these tests, the margins are nearly identical to the multicore deltas, which is unusual. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD scores 1,763 versus the Intel's 1,569, a 12.4 percent advantage. This suggests that the older Zen architecture, despite its lower boost clock of 3.70 GHz compared to the Intel's 4.20 GHz, still manages to outperform the newer Alder Lake design in this specific workload.

For users focused on lightly threaded applications, the Intel part's higher boost clock does not translate into a win in the recorded data. The database shows no scenario where the Core i3-12300T takes the lead. The closest it comes is in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, where it scores 157 against the AMD's 177, a 12.7 percent gap. Even in the most favorable comparison available, the Intel processor remains behind.

The practical implication is that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the choice for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads according to the recorded measurements. The Intel Core i3-12300T, despite its lower power envelope and newer architecture, does not demonstrate a winning use case in any of the six benchmark tests included in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design eras and philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the Zen architecture, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 4,800 million transistors into a 213 mm² die. The Intel Core i3-12300T uses the Alder Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a smaller 163 mm² die size. Transistor counts for the Intel part are not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part offers 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the AMD processor a 2x advantage in both core and thread counts, which explains its consistent lead in multicore benchmarks.

Cache layouts also differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 provides 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i3-12300T provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has larger L2 caches per core, but the AMD part has a larger L3 pool overall.

Memory support shows another divergence. The AMD processor supports DDR4 memory exclusively, running dual-channel with a recorded memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for reliability-focused builds. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is not supported on the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i3-12300T provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, a generational leap that offers more bandwidth and more lanes for expansion.

Integrated graphics present another distinction. The AMD part has no integrated graphics recorded, meaning a discrete GPU is required. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730, allowing for basic display output without a dedicated graphics card.

Clock speeds reveal an interesting trade-off. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz. The Intel processor has a lower base clock of 2.30 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The Intel part also has a much lower TDP of 35 watts versus the AMD's 65 watts, indicating a more power-efficient design.

The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD processor uses the AM4 socket, while the Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD part carries a 55th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and the Intel part also sits at the 55th percentile, placing them in the same overall performance tier despite their architectural differences.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R15 multicore test opens the comparison with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scoring 1,259 against the Intel Core i3-12300T's 1,120, a 12.4 percent advantage for AMD. The single-core variant of R15 shows a slightly larger gap, with AMD scoring 177 versus Intel's 157, a 12.7 percent lead.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore test has AMD at 5,246 and Intel at 4,669, again a 12.4 percent difference. The single-core R20 test shows AMD at 740 and Intel at 658, a 12.5 percent gap. These margins are remarkably consistent across the R15 and R20 generations, suggesting a stable performance ratio between the two parts.

Cinebench R23, the most recent test in the set, continues the pattern. In multicore, AMD scores 12,491 versus Intel's 11,118, a 12.3 percent delta. In single-core, AMD scores 1,763 versus Intel's 1,569, a 12.4 percent delta. The consistency of these deltas, all falling between 12.3 and 12.7 percent, indicates that the performance relationship between these two processors is uniform across different rendering workloads.

The Intel Core i3-12300T does have additional Geekbench results in the database, scoring 6,782 in multicore and 2,123 in single-core. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 does not have Geekbench results recorded, so a direct comparison in that test is not possible from the available data.

What the data does not show is any workload where the Intel processor wins. Despite its higher boost clock, newer architecture, and lower power consumption, the Core i3-12300T trails in every measured Cinebench test. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 3,613, while the Intel part averages 3,525, a difference of about 2.4 percent across all recorded benchmarks.

The Verdict

The data points clearly toward the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 for users who prioritize raw multi-threaded performance. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration delivers consistent 12 percent advantages over the Intel Core i3-12300T across all Cinebench versions tested. For rendering, video encoding, or any workload that scales with core count, the AMD processor is the stronger choice according to the recorded measurements.

For users who need integrated graphics, the decision flips. The Intel Core i3-12300T includes UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has no integrated graphics recorded. A system built around the Intel part can function without a discrete GPU, which is a meaningful advantage for basic office or HTPC use cases.

Power consumption also favors the Intel part. The Core i3-12300T has a 35 watt TDP compared to the AMD's 65 watts, making it the better option for thermally constrained or energy-conscious builds. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering more flexibility in platform choices, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes versus the AMD's PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

ECC memory support is a point for AMD. The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports ECC memory, which can be critical for workstation or server environments where data integrity is paramount. The Intel part does not support ECC.

The percentile rankings place both at the 55th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that they occupy the same overall performance tier. The average benchmark scores are close, with the AMD at 3,613 and the Intel at 3,525. The Intel Core i3-12300T has a recorded launch MSRP of $97, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins all six head-to-head benchmarks and offers more cores, more threads, ECC support, and an unlocked multiplier. The Intel Core i3-12300T offers integrated graphics, lower power consumption, newer PCIe standards, and dual memory support. The choice depends on whether rendering performance or platform features matter more.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmarks in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests. The Intel Core i3-12300T has zero wins in the recorded comparisons.

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the AMD scores 12,491 versus the Intel's 11,118, a 12.3 percent advantage. Similar margins appear in R15 and R20 multicore tests.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-12300T have any advantages in the data?

A: Yes. It includes UHD Graphics 730, has a lower TDP of 35 watts, supports DDR5 memory, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The AMD part has no integrated graphics and uses PCIe Gen 3.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 leads in single-core tests as well. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1,763 versus the Intel's 1,569, a 12.4 percent difference.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i3-12300T does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has an average benchmark score of 3,613. The Intel Core i3-12300T has an average of 3,525. Both sit at the 55th percentile among all CPUs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Intel Core i3-12300T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.70 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen | Alder Lake |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Die Size | 213 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Transistors | 4,800 million | Not recorded |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $97 |