AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and the Intel Processor 300T. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor records wins in direct comparison tests. This absence of paired measurements means any performance comparison must rely on the individual benchmark results recorded for each processor in the database.

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has a substantial set of recorded measurements. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22,807 in multicore and 2,228 in single-core tests. The Cinebench R15 results show 3,551 points in multicore and 343 points in single-core. PassMark results for the Ryzen 7 9850X3D include 41,318 in multithread, 4,704 in single thread, 123,140 in integer math, 81,998 in floating point math, 39,272 in extended instructions, 22,856 in data encryption, 474,501 in data compression, 49,764 in random string sorting, 4,171 in physics, and 435 in find prime numbers.

The Intel Processor 300T, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its avgBenchmarkScore is 0, and its benchmark array is empty. The percentileVsAllCpus field for the Intel Processor 300T is 50, meaning the database places it at the median of all tested CPUs based on whatever aggregate data exists. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D sits at the 92nd percentile. With no individual workload scores for the Intel part, there are no exact numerical deltas to report between the two in any specific test.

The nearest rival data for the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D provides context for its standing. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58,386. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, which scores 58,323. It trails the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.2% (58,504), leads the Intel Core i9-14900 by 0.5% (58,115), and trails the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 by 0.7% (58,826). These deltas place the Ryzen 7 9850X3D in a tight cluster where a single percentage point separates it from its nearest competitors, which indicates the 8-core part performs at parity with much larger server and desktop processors in aggregate scoring.

The Intel Processor 300T has no nearest rivals recorded, so no comparable delta data exists in the database. The only quantitative anchor for the Intel part is its 50th percentile placement and the fact that it has no average score.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the only one of the two processors with measurable performance records. Its 92nd percentile ranking and 58,386 average benchmark score demonstrate a high-performing desktop CPU, while the Intel Processor 300T sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded workload scores. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D delivers 8 cores and 16 threads, the Intel Processor 300T delivers 2 cores and 4 threads. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock listed. The Ryzen part carries a 120 W TDP, the Intel part a 35 W TDP.

The launch MSRP of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is $499. The launch MSRP of the Intel Processor 300T is $82. The Intel part is a dual-core desktop processor with a locked multiplier, DDR4 and DDR5 support, and UHD Graphics 710 integrated graphics. The AMD part is an unlocked 8-core processor with DDR5 support, Radeon Graphics, and a 96 MB shared L3 cache. For workloads that depend on multi-core throughput, the recorded data supports the AMD processor. The Intel Processor 300T, with no benchmark records, cannot be assessed for any specific workload from this database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58,386. The Intel Processor 300T has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed specifications for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, with no boost clock listed in the database.

Q: What percentile ranking does each processor hold?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor 300T is at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has a TDP of 120 W. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Processor 300T uses Intel Socket 1700. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads; the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks differ: 4.70 GHz for the AMD part versus 3.40 GHz for the Intel part. The AMD processor has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the Intel processor has no boost clock listed. TDP is 120 W for the AMD part and 35 W for the Intel part. The AMD processor is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 8,315 million transistors and a 70.6 mm² die size. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel with a 163 mm² die size and no transistor count listed. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD part and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel part. L3 cache is 96 MB shared on the AMD part and 6 MB shared on the Intel part. Memory support differs: the AMD processor supports DDR5 only, the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not the Intel part. PCIe configurations differ: the AMD part provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes, the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon Graphics on the AMD part, UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel part. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, the Intel multiplier is locked. Release dates differ: 2026-01-28 for the AMD part, 2024-01-07 for the Intel part. Part numbers are 100-000001973 for the AMD part and SRN3K for the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge, belonging to the 9000 series. The Intel Processor 300T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-S. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process node and is fabricated by TSMC. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process node and is fabricated by Intel. The AMD processor has an 8-core, 16-thread design with a 96 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core. The Intel processor has a 2-core, 4-thread design with a 6 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core. Both processors have an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD part includes ECC memory support, a feature absent from the Intel part. The AMD part has a larger PCIe lane count at 24 lanes versus 16 lanes on the Intel part, both Gen 5. The AMD part uses DDR5 memory exclusively with a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD processor belongs to the Ryzen 7 generation of Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) parts, while the Intel processor is categorized as an Intel Processor generation part under Raptor Lake. The AMD part has a 120 W TDP and is positioned for high-throughput desktop workloads, while the Intel part has a 35 W TDP and is positioned as a low-power desktop part. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking support, whereas the Intel processor has a locked multiplier. The AMD processor integrates Radeon Graphics, and the Intel processor integrates UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part's 4 nm TSMC process and 70.6 mm² die size contrast with the Intel part's 10 nm Intel process and 163 mm² die size, reflecting different manufacturing approaches and transistor densities. The AMD processor's 8,315 million transistor count is recorded, while the Intel processor has no transistor count in the database. The production status for both parts is listed as Active. The AMD part was released on 2026-01-28, and the Intel part on 2024-01-07.