AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D
Core i5-14600
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core i5-14600
# AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core i5-14600
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Core i5-14600 represent two fundamentally different approaches to desktop processing. The AMD part uses a 4 nm Zen 5 design with 8 cores, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm Raptor Lake design with 14 cores. Across 15 shared benchmark comparisons, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D takes 10 wins, while the Intel Core i5-14600 takes 5. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 58386, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part averages 44889 and sits in the 89th percentile.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D dominates in compute-heavy, multi-threaded workloads. It wins passmark_multithread with a 15.3% margin, passmark_physics with a 79% margin, and passmark_find_prime_numbers with a massive 180.6% margin. Its 8 cores with 16 threads and 96 MB of shared L3 cache deliver strong results in integer math (5.2% ahead), extended instructions (53% ahead), and data compression (9.2% ahead). The AMD part also wins both single-thread tests in the Passmark suite, showing 12.9% advantages in passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread.
The Intel Core i5-14600 wins in the Cinebench rendering tests, taking cinebench_r23_multicore by 25.1% and cinebench_r23_singlecore by 48.2%. It also wins cinebench_r15_singlecore by 20.8%, along with passmark_data_encryption (8.9% ahead) and passmark_floating_point_math (4.4% ahead). The Intel part uses 14 cores with 20 threads, which explains its strong showing in the multi-core Cinebench tests where the AMD part's 8 cores cannot match the extra physical cores.
The split is clear. For general multi-threaded workloads, simulation physics, prime number calculations, and compression tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D leads. For rendering workloads in Cinebench, encryption, and floating-point math, the Intel Core i5-14600 holds the advantage. The AMD part's 96 MB shared L3 cache appears to help in data-heavy tasks, while the Intel part's higher core count and 24 MB shared L3 cache serve rendering workloads well.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D records an average benchmark score of 58386, compared to 44889 for the Intel Core i5-14600. The AMD part sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits in the 89th percentile.
Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600 wins cinebench_r23_multicore with a score of 30464, which is 25.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D's score of 22807.
Q: Which processor wins in Passmark single-thread performance?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread with a score of 4704, which is 12.9% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600's score of 4167.
Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?
A: The largest gap is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 435 against the Intel Core i5-14600's 155, a 180.6% difference. The Intel part's biggest win is cinebench_r23_singlecore, where it leads by 48.2%.
Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads.
Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?
A: Only the Intel Core i5-14600 supports DDR4 memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Cinebench results reveal a striking pattern. In cinebench_r23_multicore, the Intel Core i5-14600 scores 30464 against the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D's 22807, a 25.1% advantage. The single-core gap is even larger: 4300 versus 2228 in cinebench_r23_singlecore, a 48.2% margin for Intel. However, in the older cinebench_r15_multicore test, the AMD part wins 3551 to 3070, a 15.7% margin. The Intel part wins cinebench_r15_singlecore 433 to 343, a 20.8% margin. These results show the Intel part's strength in the newer Cinebench versions, while the AMD part holds its own in the older multi-core test.
The Passmark suite tells a different story. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins passmark_multithread 41318 to 35848, a 15.3% margin. In passmark_physics, the AMD part scores 4171 against 2330, a 79% advantage. The prime number test shows the largest gap: 435 versus 155, a 180.6% win for AMD. Extended instructions favor AMD by 53% (39272 to 25674). Data compression goes to AMD by 9.2% (474501 to 434620). Integer math favors AMD by 5.2% (123140 to 117078), and random string sorting favors AMD by 3.6% (49764 to 48043).
The Intel Core i5-14600 wins passmark_data_encryption 25082 to 22856, an 8.9% margin. It also wins passmark_floating_point_math 85759 to 81998, a 4.4% margin. In single-thread Passmark tests, the AMD part wins both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread with identical scores of 4704 versus 4167, a 12.9% margin.
The data suggests the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D delivers stronger results across a broader range of Passmark workloads, while the Intel Core i5-14600 excels specifically in Cinebench rendering and floating-point operations. The AMD part's 96 MB shared L3 cache likely contributes to its dominance in data compression, extended instructions, and prime number calculations, where larger working sets benefit from more cache.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: the AMD part runs at 4.70 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 2.70 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the AMD part at 5.60 GHz and the Intel part at 5.20 GHz. The AMD part carries a 120 W TDP, while the Intel part carries a 65 W TDP.
Cache configurations differ significantly. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core for the AMD part, while the Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache difference is stark: the AMD part has 96 MB shared, while the Intel part has 24 MB shared.
Memory support differs. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory.
PCIe configurations differ: the AMD part provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part uses an AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon Graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is unlocked for overclocking, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has a locked multiplier. The AMD part was released on 2026-01-28, while the Intel part was released on 2024-01-07. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $499, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $255.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It contains 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. No transistor count is recorded for the Intel part, but its die size is 257 mm².
The AMD part belongs to the 9000 series and the Ryzen 7 generation, specifically Zen 5 (Granite Ridge). The Intel part belongs to Core 14th Gen and the Core i5 generation, specifically Raptor Lake Refresh. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which explains the AMD part's smaller die size despite fewer cores.
The 96 MB shared L3 cache on the AMD part stands out as a major architectural feature. This is substantially larger than the Intel part's 24 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger cache appears to drive its wins in cache-sensitive workloads like data compression and prime number calculations. The Intel part's 14 cores provide a raw thread count advantage that helps in rendering workloads.
Both processors use dual-channel memory controllers, but the AMD part supports only DDR5 while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part's memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel part. Both support ECC memory.
The Verdict
The benchmark data points to clear use-case separation. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D delivers superior results in multi-threaded Passmark workloads, physics simulations, prime number calculations, extended instruction sets, data compression, integer math, and single-thread Passmark tests. Its 10 wins out of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, combined with a 92nd percentile ranking and an average score of 58386, indicate a processor that handles a broad range of compute tasks with strength.
The Intel Core i5-14600 wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core, Cinebench R15 single-core, data encryption, and floating-point math. Its 14 cores and 20 threads give it a clear advantage in rendering workloads, as shown by the 25.1% margin in cinebench_r23_multicore and the 48.2% margin in cinebench_r23_singlecore. Its 89th percentile ranking and average score of 44889 place it below the AMD part in overall standing.
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D also holds advantages in architectural efficiency with its 4 nm process and 96 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14600 counters with a lower 65 W TDP, a lower launch MSRP of $255, and support for DDR4 memory. The AMD part's 120 W TDP and $499 launch MSRP reflect its higher-end positioning.
For workloads centered on simulation, compression, integer math, and general multi-threaded compute, the data favors the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D. For rendering, encryption, and floating-point math, the Intel Core i5-14600 proves competitive. The choice between them depends on which benchmark suite matches the intended workload, but the recorded measurements show the AMD part winning the majority of direct comparisons.