AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core i5-14500HX Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

CORE STATE Granite Ridge
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.7 Base / 5.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 120W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14500HX

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-HX
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.6 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
3,551
2,442
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
343
344
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
22,807
24,234
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,228
3,421
passmark_data_compression
474,501
333,851
passmark_data_encryption
22,856
19,502
passmark_extended_instructions
39,272
20,019
passmark_find_prime_numbers
435
130
passmark_floating_point_math
81,998
69,442
passmark_integer_math
123,140
95,584
passmark_multithread
41,318
28,508
passmark_physics
4,171
1,911
passmark_random_string_sorting
49,764
36,219
passmark_single_thread
4,704
3,629
passmark_singlethread
4,704
3,629
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,178
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,436
geekbench_multicore
N/A
10,171
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,129

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core i5-14500HX

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Core i5-14500HX target entirely different market segments, yet their benchmark collision reveals a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD part, a desktop flagship built on Zen 5, dominates the majority of recorded workloads, while the Intel mobile processor counters with superior results in specific Cinebench tests. Out of 15 shared benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D claims 12 wins, leaving the Intel Core i5-14500HX with 3 wins. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 58386, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel chip averages 35094 and sits in the 84th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D delivers its most decisive victories in computational stress tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 3551 against 2442 for Intel, a margin of 45.4%. PassMark physics shows an even larger gap, with AMD at 4171 and Intel at 1911, a difference of 118.3%. The most extreme outlier is PassMark find prime numbers, where AMD records 435 versus Intel's 130, meaning AMD finishes 234.6% ahead. These results indicate that the AMD architecture handles raw mathematical workloads and physics simulations with substantially greater efficiency.

PassMark extended instructions highlights the architectural gulf between the two. AMD scores 39272, while Intel manages 20019, a 96.2% advantage. This near-doubling of performance in AVX and similar instruction sets suggests that the Zen 5 core design extracts significantly more throughput from vectorized code. Integer math follows the same trend, with AMD at 123140 versus Intel's 95584, a 28.8% lead. Floating-point math also favors AMD, 81998 to 69442, a 18.1% margin.

Memory-related and data-intensive tasks consistently favor AMD. PassMark data compression shows AMD at 474501 against Intel's 333851, a 42.1% advantage. Random string sorting has AMD ahead by 37.4%, scoring 49764 versus 36219. Data encryption favors AMD by 17.2%, with scores of 22856 and 19502 respectively. The PassMark multi-thread test confirms the overall pattern, AMD scoring 41318 against 28508, a 44.9% lead. Even single-threaded PassMark tests show AMD ahead, 4704 versus 3629, a 29.6% margin.

Intel's wins are concentrated in Cinebench R23 and the single-core variant of Cinebench R15. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 24234 against AMD's 22807, a 5.9% advantage. The R23 single-core result is more pronounced, Intel at 3421 versus AMD at 2228, a 34.9% lead. Cinebench R15 single-core is nearly identical, Intel at 344 and AMD at 343, a 0.3% margin. These results suggest that Intel's Raptor Lake cores hold an advantage in certain lightly threaded rendering workloads, despite losing the broader single-thread PassMark comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D records an average benchmark score of 58386, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX averages 35094. AMD also holds a higher percentile ranking at 92 compared to Intel's 84.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: Intel wins this test with a score of 24234 against AMD's 22807, a delta of 5.9%. This is one of only three benchmark wins for Intel in the head-to-head comparison.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap appears in PassMark find prime numbers, where AMD scores 435 and Intel scores 130, giving AMD a 234.6% advantage. This is the most extreme delta recorded across all shared tests.

Q: Which processor performs better in data compression?

A: AMD leads PassMark data compression with a score of 474501, compared to Intel's 333851. This represents a 42.1% advantage for the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the two processors are nearly tied?

A: Cinebench R15 single-core is the closest result, with Intel scoring 344 and AMD scoring 343, a difference of only 0.3%. This remains a win for Intel, but the margin is negligible.

Q: How many benchmark wins does each processor claim?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins 12 of the 15 shared benchmarks. The Intel Core i5-14500HX wins 3, all of which are Cinebench tests.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload type. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the superior processor for the vast majority of measured tasks, including data compression, encryption, integer and floating-point math, physics, and multi-threaded PassMark tests. Its wins span 12 out of 15 benchmarks, with margins ranging from 17.2% to 234.6%. The Intel Core i5-14500HX should be selected only when Cinebench R23 performance is the priority, particularly the single-core variant where it leads by 34.9%.

The AMD processor's 92nd percentile ranking versus Intel's 84th percentile reinforces its overall standing. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M with an average score of 58323 (0.1% lower) and the Intel Core i9-14900 at 58115 (0.5% lower), placing it in strong company. The Intel Core i5-14500HX, by contrast, sits near the Intel Core i9-12900HX at 35003 (0.3% lower) and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 (0.5% higher).

For desktop users running multi-threaded productivity, data processing, or physics-based simulations, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the data-backed choice. For mobile users whose workflows depend on Cinebench rendering scores, the Intel Core i5-14500HX offers a specific, measurable advantage in that narrow domain.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in core configuration. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX uses 14 cores and 20 threads. Despite having fewer cores, AMD wins the majority of multi-threaded benchmarks. Clock speeds also diverge sharply: AMD's base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost of 5.60 GHz, whereas Intel operates at a 2.60 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost.

Thermal design power reflects their different market positions. The AMD desktop part carries a TDP of 120, while the Intel mobile chip is rated at 55. Socket compatibility differs as well, with AMD using AMD Socket AM5 and Intel using Intel BGA 1964. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no comparable figure recorded for Intel.

PCIe lane counts differ, with AMD offering 24 Gen 5 lanes and Intel offering 16 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon Graphics, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $499, while no launch MSRP is recorded for Intel. Both processors have unlocked multipliers, and both support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is built on Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, part of the 9000 series. It uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of Core 14th Gen. Its process node is 10 nm, produced by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm² and no transistor count recorded.

Cache hierarchies reveal a major difference in L3 capacity. The AMD processor has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, while Intel has 24 MB of shared L3. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. L2 cache differs, with AMD at 1 MB per core and Intel at 2 MB per core. The AMD processor's large L3 allocation likely contributes to its strong performance in data-heavy PassMark tests.

Release timing also differs. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D was released on 2026-01-28, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX was released on 2024-01-07. The AMD part number is 100-000001973, and the Intel part number is SRMXJ. Process node advantages for AMD (4 nm versus 10 nm) and the larger L3 cache are the most significant architectural differentiators.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins in data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating-point math, integer math, multi-thread PassMark, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread PassMark. These wins span both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests, indicating broad architectural superiority. The 234.6% lead in prime number finding and 118.3% lead in physics make AMD the clear choice for mathematical computation, scientific simulation, and data processing workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14500HX wins in Cinebench R15 single-core, Cinebench R23 single-core, and Cinebench R23 multi-core. The R23 single-core win by 34.9% is substantial, suggesting that Intel's Raptor Lake cores excel in certain rendering workloads despite losing the PassMark single-thread test. The R23 multi-core win by 5.9% indicates that Intel's higher core count can overcome AMD's per-core efficiency in this specific benchmark.

The use-case split is therefore clear. AMD dominates general-purpose computing, data manipulation, and physics-based tasks. Intel wins specifically in Cinebench rendering scenarios, making it the preferable option for users whose primary benchmark is Cinebench R23, especially in single-core mode. The 14-core Intel processor also offers a higher thread count for parallel rendering tasks, though this advantage does not translate to wins in most other multi-threaded tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D remains the overall performance leader based on the recorded data.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 9850X3D
i5-14500HX
Core Specs
Cores
8
14 +75.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.7
2.6 -44.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.6
4.9 -12.5%
Frequency (GHz)
4.7
2.6 -44.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.6
4.9 -12.5%
Multiplier
47
26 -44.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
96 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
120
55 -54.2%
PL1
—
55 W
PL2
—
157 W
PPT
162 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Granite Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))
Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,315 million
—
Die Size
70.6 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel BGA 1964
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
1900 MHz up to 3.7 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$499
—
Part Number
100-000001973
SRMXJ
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 7 9850X3D Details View Core i5-14500HX Details