AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core 3 100U Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

CORE STATE Granite Ridge
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.7 Base / 5.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 120W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 3 100U

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-U
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.2 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 10 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
3,551
1,070
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
343
150
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
22,807
10,624
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,228
1,499
passmark_data_compression
474,501
136,497
passmark_data_encryption
22,856
8,128
passmark_extended_instructions
39,272
7,894
passmark_find_prime_numbers
435
52
passmark_floating_point_math
81,998
28,322
passmark_integer_math
123,140
39,580
passmark_multithread
41,318
12,522
passmark_physics
4,171
876
passmark_random_string_sorting
49,764
15,191
passmark_single_thread
4,704
3,506
passmark_singlethread
4,704
3,506
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
4,462
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
629

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Intel Core 3 100U

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data leaves no ambiguity: the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the Intel Core 3 100U. The widest margin appears in the passmark_find_prime_numbers test, where the AMD part scores 435 versus 52 for Intel, a delta of 736.5%. That is not a small gap; it is a categorical difference in raw integer iteration capability.

Multi-threaded workloads show similarly decisive results. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD processor scores 3551 against Intel's 1070, a 231.9% advantage. Cinebench R23 multi-core follows the same pattern: 22807 versus 10624, a 114.7% lead. The PassMark multi-thread test records 41318 for AMD and 12522 for Intel, a 230% difference. These numbers indicate that the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D delivers more than double the throughput in several heavily parallel tasks.

Single-thread performance is closer but still favors AMD. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 343 versus 150, a 128.7% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core records 2228 versus 1499, a 48.6% advantage. PassMark single-thread scores are 4704 and 3506, a 34.2% gap. The single-thread deltas are smaller than the multi-thread ones, but they remain substantial, suggesting that the AMD architecture's higher base and boost clocks contribute directly to per-core efficiency.

The specialized PassMark tests reinforce the overall picture. Data compression scores 474501 for AMD versus 136497 for Intel, a 247.6% difference. Data encryption records 22856 versus 8128, a 181.2% lead. Extended instructions show 39272 versus 7894, a 397.5% margin. Floating-point math delivers 81998 versus 28322, a 189.5% difference. Integer math posts 123140 versus 39580, a 211.1% lead. Random string sorting yields 49764 versus 15191, a 227.6% gap. Physics simulation records 4171 versus 876, a 376.1% advantage. Every single metric points in the same direction, with no counterexample in the database.

The average benchmark scores place the AMD part at 58386 and the Intel part at 16148. That is a 3.6x difference in the aggregate. The percentile rankings reflect this: AMD sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while Intel sits at the 70th percentile. For context, the AMD part's nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M at 58323 (0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon w5-2545 at 58504 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900 at 58115 (0.5% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 at 58826 (-0.7% delta). The Intel Core 3 100U, by contrast, sits near the Intel Core i7-10850H at 16204 (-0.3% delta), the Intel Core i5-10600KF at 16228 (-0.5% delta), the Intel Core i7-1260U at 16320 (-1.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H at 16341 (-1.2% delta). The AMD part competes with desktop server and high-end desktop chips, while the Intel part aligns with older mobile and mid-range desktop processors from several generations prior.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 22807 versus 10624 for the Intel Core 3 100U, a 114.7% lead. In PassMark multi-thread, the scores are 41318 versus 12522, a 230% difference.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The AMD part leads in every single-thread test. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 2228 versus 1499, a 48.6% advantage. PassMark single-thread shows 4704 versus 3506, a 34.2% lead. The smallest single-thread delta in the database is that 34.2% PassMark result.

Q: What do the passmark_find_prime_numbers scores indicate?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 435, while the Intel Core 3 100U scores 52. That is a delta of 736.5%, the largest margin among all recorded head-to-head tests. This test stresses repeated integer operations, and the AMD part's raw throughput is dramatically higher.

Q: How do the two processors compare in data compression and encryption?

A: In data compression, AMD scores 474501 versus 136497 for Intel, a 247.6% lead. In data encryption, AMD scores 22856 versus 8128, a 181.2% advantage. Both tests show AMD delivering more than double the performance of Intel.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58386, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 100U has an average score of 16148, placing it at the 70th percentile.

Q: Are there any tests where the Intel Core 3 100U wins?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark list contains 15 tests, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins all 15. The Intel part records zero wins in the database.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear division of roles. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is designed for workloads that demand maximum throughput: multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and physics simulation. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22807 and PassMark multi-thread score of 41318 place it in the company of desktop server processors like the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and the Intel Core i9-14900. The Intel Core 3 100U, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10624 and PassMark multi-thread score of 12522, aligns more closely with older mobile chips such as the Intel Core i7-10850H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H.

For single-thread tasks, the AMD part still leads, but the margin is smaller. The 34.2% PassMark single-thread gap and the 48.6% Cinebench R23 single-core gap show that the Intel part is not wholly outclassed in lightly threaded work, but it remains behind. The AMD part's base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz provide a foundation for that lead, while the Intel part's base clock of 1.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz explain its lower single-thread scores.

Given the 15-to-0 win record, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the only choice for any benchmark-driven selection. The Intel Core 3 100U's 15-watt TDP and mobile socket suggest a different intent: low-power portable systems. But the benchmark data shows that intent does not translate into competitive performance against the AMD part. The AMD part's 120-watt TDP and desktop socket indicate a performance-first design, and the numbers confirm that design goal. The Intel part's 70th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of all CPUs, while the AMD part's 92nd percentile places it near the top.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100U has 6 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 4.70 GHz versus 1.20 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.60 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. TDP is 120 watts versus 15 watts. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1744, a soldered mobile socket.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, plus ECC memory support. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database, and it lacks ECC support. PCIe lanes differ: the AMD part provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics differ: the AMD part includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 64EU. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, the Intel part does not. Part numbers are 100-000001973 for AMD and SRMYL for Intel. The AMD part's launch MSRP is $499, while the Intel part's launch MSRP is $426.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 100U uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-U, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part has 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, while the Intel part has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

Cache structures differ significantly. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache is the big differentiator: the AMD part has 96 MB shared L3, while the Intel part has 10 MB shared L3. That 9.6x difference in L3 capacity aligns with the AMD part's larger performance margins in data-heavy tests like compression and encryption.

The AMD part is a desktop processor with a 120-watt TDP, while the Intel part is a mobile processor with a 15-watt TDP. The AMD part's release date is recorded as 2026-01-28, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-01-07. Both are marked as Active in production status. The AMD part belongs to the 9000 series, while the Intel part has no series field filled.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D wins every benchmark category in the database, but the magnitude of the win varies by workload type. The largest margins appear in compute-heavy integer and floating-point tasks. The passmark_find_prime_numbers test shows a 736.5% lead, and passmark_extended_instructions shows a 397.5% lead. These are tasks that stress raw execution resources, and the AMD part's higher clocks and larger cache clearly benefit.

The physics simulation test shows a 376.1% lead, indicating the AMD part handles complex multi-body calculations far faster. Data compression and encryption show leads of 247.6% and 181.2%, respectively, which are consistent with the 96 MB L3 cache versus 10 MB L3 cache. Larger cache means more data resident on-chip, reducing memory access penalties.

Multi-threaded rendering tests show leads of 231.9% (Cinebench R15) and 114.7% (Cinebench R23). The PassMark multi-thread test shows a 230% lead. These tests benefit from the AMD part's 16 threads versus the Intel part's 8 threads, plus the higher base and boost clocks. The AMD part's 8 cores with 16 threads simply out-provision the Intel part's 6 cores with 8 threads.

The smallest wins for the AMD part are in single-thread tests. PassMark single-thread shows a 34.2% lead, and Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 48.6% lead. These still favor AMD, but the gap narrows, suggesting the Intel part's Raptor Lake cores are not drastically behind in per-thread efficiency. The Intel part's boost clock of 4.70 GHz is close to the AMD part's base clock of 4.70 GHz, which explains why the single-thread deltas are the smallest in the dataset.

The Intel Core 3 100U has no recorded wins. Its strengths, if any, would have to come from its lower 15-watt TDP and mobile socket, which are outside the benchmark scope. Within the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the clear performer across all 15 head-to-head tests, with the largest margins in integer-heavy and cache-sensitive workloads.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 9850X3D
3 100U
Core Specs
Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Threads
16
8 -50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.7
1.2 -74.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.6
4.7 -16.1%
Frequency (GHz)
4.7
1.2 -74.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.6
4.7 -16.1%
Multiplier
47
12 -74.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
96 MB (shared)
10 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
120
15 -87.5%
PL1
15 W
PL2
55 W
PPT
162 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Granite Ridge
Raptor Lake-U
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-U)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,315 million
Die Size
70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
900 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
UHD Graphics 64EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$499
$426
Part Number
100-000001973
SRMYL
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Ryzen 7 9850X3D Details View Core 3 100U Details