AMD Ryzen 7 9700F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H shows a clear split across the PassMark test suite, with the AMD part taking 8 of 11 head-to-head comparisons. The largest margin comes in integer math, where the Ryzen 7 9700F scores 120,788 against the Intel part's 62,070, a lead of 94.6%. That result demonstrates a substantial advantage in tasks driven by integer throughput, which often correlates with general productivity workloads.

Data compression also favors the AMD processor heavily. The Ryzen 7 9700F records 421,988 in PassMark data compression versus 280,340 for the Core Ultra 5 336H, a 50.5% gap. Extended instruction performance follows a similar pattern: 33,688 for AMD versus 24,542 for Intel, a 37.3% delta. Random string sorting shows the Ryzen 7 9700F ahead by 33.4% (45,890 versus 34,402), and multithread performance gives AMD a 27.8% advantage (36,470 versus 28,545).

Single-thread results are also decisive. The Ryzen 7 9700F posts 4,691 in PassMark single thread, while the Core Ultra 5 336H manages 4,013, putting AMD ahead by 16.9%. Encryption is nearly a tie, with AMD edging out a 0.9% win (21,488 versus 21,291), which suggests the two processors have comparable cryptographic throughput despite their architectural differences.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H claims three wins, and its most striking victory is in prime number finding. It scores 299 against 183 for AMD, a 38.8% margin that indicates the Intel part handles this specific algorithmic pattern considerably better. Physics simulation also goes to Intel: 2,682 versus 2,122, a 20.9% lead. Floating point math shows a narrower Intel advantage, 82,415 versus 77,955, a 5.4% delta.

The overall PassMark average benchmark score reinforces the split: the Ryzen 7 9700F averages 69,996, while the Core Ultra 5 336H averages 34,485. That places the AMD chip at the 94th percentile among all CPUs in the database, compared to the 84th percentile for the Intel chip. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% higher average), Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.2% lower), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% higher), and Intel Core i7-14700K (0.9% higher). The Intel mobile part sits near the Intel Core i7-13700HX (0.2% lower), Intel Core i5-13450HX (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (0.7% higher), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.8% higher).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 4,691 in PassMark single thread, which is 16.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 4,013.

Q: How does the multithread performance compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F delivers 36,470 in PassMark multithread, a 27.8% advantage over the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 28,545.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the Intel part wins?

A: Yes. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins in prime number finding (299 versus 183, a 38.8% lead), physics simulation (2,682 versus 2,122, a 20.9% lead), and floating point math (82,415 versus 77,955, a 5.4% lead).

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69,996, placing it at the 94th percentile. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H averages 34,485, at the 84th percentile.

Q: How do the processors compare in data encryption?

A: They are nearly identical. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 21,488, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 21,291, a difference of only 0.9% in favor of AMD.

Q: Which processor has a larger cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 18 MB of shared L3 cache. However, the Intel part has larger per-core L1 (192 KB versus 80 KB) and L2 (2.5 MB versus 1 MB) caches.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop chip built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It uses AMD Socket AM5 and integrates 8 cores with 16 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a mobile processor based on Panther Lake, fabricated on Intel's own 3 nm process, and uses Intel BGA 2540. It has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning it offers more physical cores but no simultaneous multithreading, while the AMD part uses 8 cores with 16 threads.

Core counts alone do not explain the benchmark outcomes. The Ryzen 7 9700F's higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 4.60 GHz for the Intel chip, combined with a base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 1.90 GHz, helps explain its strong single-thread and integer results. The Intel part's lower TDP of 25 watts contrasts sharply with the AMD chip's 65 watt TDP, reflecting the mobile target of the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. The AMD processor uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. Larger per-core caches on the Intel side may contribute to its wins in prime number finding and physics simulation, while the larger shared L3 on the AMD side may benefit workloads that reuse data across cores.

Memory support also differs. Both support DDR5 and dual-channel memory buses, but the Intel part adds LPDDR5X support and shows a higher memory bandwidth figure of 115.2 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s for AMD. The AMD chip supports ECC memory; the Intel chip does not. PCIe lanes also differ: the AMD processor provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part includes integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has no integrated graphics.

Process node and foundry details further separate the two. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Intel chip uses a 3 nm Intel process, but the database records no transistor count or die size for it. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier and a part number of 100-000001902; the Intel processor is locked, with part number SA4RD. Release dates differ as well: the Ryzen 7 9700F launched on 2025-09-15, and the Core Ultra 5 336H on 2026-01-04.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F as the stronger overall performer in this comparison. Its average benchmark score of 69,996 is roughly double the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 34,485, and it holds the higher percentile ranking at 94 versus 84. For workloads centered on integer math, data compression, multithreaded execution, and single-thread responsiveness, the AMD part delivers decisive advantages: 94.6% in integer math, 50.5% in data compression, 27.8% in multithread, and 16.9% in single-thread.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is not without merit. Its wins in prime number finding (38.8% ahead), physics (20.9% ahead), and floating point math (5.4% ahead) show that specific algorithmic patterns can favor the Intel architecture. These results suggest the Intel chip handles certain math-heavy or simulation-style tasks with greater efficiency, despite its lower overall average.

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop processor with a 65 watt TDP, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a mobile processor with a 25 watt TDP. That power envelope difference is a key context for interpreting the scores. The Intel part achieves competitive results in several tests while drawing far less power, which matters for portable systems. The AMD part, by contrast, uses its larger power budget to deliver higher peak performance in most measured categories.

For users selecting a processor strictly on measured performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the clear choice based on the database records. It wins the majority of head-to-head benchmarks, has a higher average score, and ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H remains relevant for scenarios where the 25 watt TDP and integrated graphics are priorities, but its benchmark profile shows a lower overall performance ceiling.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 9700F | Intel Core Ultra 5 336H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | 9000 series | Core Ultra Series 3 |

| Cores | 8 | 16 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 25 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Panther Lake |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 lanes | Gen 5, 12 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | N/A | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2025-09-15 | 2026-01-04 |

| Launch MSRP | $289 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part number | 100-000001902 | SA4RD |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F dominates in integer-heavy and throughput-oriented workloads. Its 94.6% advantage in integer math makes it the preferred option for general computation, spreadsheet-style number crunching, and any application that relies on integer operations. The 50.5% lead in data compression points to advantages in file archiving and data transfer tasks. The 33.4% margin in random string sorting also favors AMD for data manipulation and text processing workloads.

Multithreaded applications benefit from the Ryzen 7 9700F's 27.8% lead in PassMark multithread. Video rendering, batch processing, and parallel compilation workloads would align with this result. The 16.9% single-thread advantage reinforces AMD's position for lightly threaded applications such as many desktop productivity tools and legacy software. The 37.3% extended instructions lead suggests AMD also holds an advantage in workloads using advanced instruction sets.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins in prime number finding with a 38.8% margin, which indicates an edge in algorithms that involve modular arithmetic or primality testing. Its 20.9% physics lead points to advantages in physics simulation and related computational physics tasks. The 5.4% floating point math win, while smaller, still shows Intel handling floating-point-heavy calculations with slightly better efficiency.

The market segments clarify the intended use cases. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop processor, and its benchmark wins align with desktop productivity and content creation scenarios. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a mobile processor with a 25 watt TDP and integrated graphics, suited for portable systems where power consumption and graphics output matter. The recorded data does not suggest the Intel part can match the AMD part in overall throughput, but it does confirm targeted wins in specific computational patterns.