AMD Ryzen 7 9700F vs Intel Core 9 273PE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Core 9 273PE are two desktop processors that target different strengths, and the benchmark data confirms a clear split. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F dominates in single-threaded performance and specialized instruction workloads, while the Intel Core 9 273PE takes the lead in raw multi-threaded throughput and math-heavy operations. The head-to-head results show the Intel chip wins 6 of the 11 recorded comparisons, but the AMD chip’s victories are often by larger margins, particularly where per-core efficiency matters.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the clear winner for single-thread-bound tasks. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4691 is 28.5% higher than the Intel Core 9 273PE’s 3650, a massive gap that makes the AMD part the better choice for applications that rely on one or two cores. The data also shows a 36.8% advantage in extended instructions (33688 vs 24630), indicating superior performance in workloads using modern CPU instruction sets like AVX-512. Data compression also favors AMD, with a 4% lead (421988 vs 405885), and random string sorting is 1.8% faster (45890 vs 45098).

The Intel Core 9 273PE wins where core count and parallelism matter. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it produces higher scores in integer math (139410 vs 120788, a 13.4% lead) and floating-point math (107884 vs 77955, a 27.7% lead). The physics benchmark shows the largest gap in Intel’s favor at 32% (3120 vs 2122), suggesting a strong advantage in simulated physics calculations. The multithread score is nearly a tie, but Intel still edges ahead by 0.9% (36810 vs 36470), and it also wins in prime number finding (203 vs 183, a 9.9% lead) and data encryption (22719 vs 21488, a 5.4% lead).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 4691 in PassMark single-thread, which is 28.5% ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PE’s 3650.

Q: Which processor wins in multithreaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE records a PassMark multithread score of 36810, slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F’s 36470, a 0.9% difference.

Q: How do the two compare in floating-point math?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE is significantly stronger, scoring 107884 versus the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F’s 77955, a 27.7% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: Both processors have a 65 W TDP, so they are rated for the same thermal design power.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 9 273PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest victory for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is in extended instructions, where it scores 33688 compared to the Intel Core 9 273PE’s 24630, a 36.8% margin. This indicates a substantial advantage in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets, often found in scientific computing and media encoding. The single-thread test is another dominant win for AMD, with 4691 versus 3650, a 28.5% gap that confirms its per-core performance superiority.

The Intel Core 9 273PE’s biggest win is in the physics benchmark, scoring 3120 versus 2122, a 32% lead. This suggests a strong performance in physics simulations, which often scale well with core count. Floating-point math is also a major Intel win at 27.7% (107884 vs 77955), and integer math shows a 13.4% advantage (139410 vs 120788). The data encryption test gives Intel a 5.4% lead (22719 vs 21488), and prime number finding shows Intel ahead by 9.9% (203 vs 183).

The multithread score is the closest comparison, with Intel’s 36810 barely edging out AMD’s 36470, a 0.9% difference. This near-tie suggests that despite the core count gap, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F’s higher per-core efficiency nearly compensates. Data compression is a narrow AMD win at 4% (421988 vs 405885), and random string sorting is an even tighter AMD victory at 1.8% (45890 vs 45098). Overall, the head-to-head data shows 5 wins for AMD and 6 for Intel, but the magnitude of AMD’s wins in single-thread and extended instructions is more pronounced than most of Intel’s victories.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ significantly: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks also differ, with AMD at 3.80 GHz and Intel at 2.30 GHz, but the Intel part boosts higher to 5.70 GHz versus AMD’s 5.50 GHz. Both are rated at 65 W TDP, but they use different sockets: AMD uses Socket AM5, while Intel uses Socket 1700.

Cache configuration differs in L2 and L3. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has 1 MB of L2 per core and 32 MB of shared L3, whereas the Intel Core 9 273PE has 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. Memory support also differs: AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is identical at 89.6 GB/s for both, and both support ECC memory.

PCIe lane counts differ, with AMD offering Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only) and Intel offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core 9 273PE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has no integrated graphics. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. The release dates differ as well, with AMD launching on 2025-09-15 and Intel on 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP for the AMD is $289, and for the Intel it is $549. The process nodes are different, with AMD using 4 nm from TSMC and Intel using 10 nm from its own foundry.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge, part of the 9000 series. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC and contains 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Intel Core 9 273PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process node from Intel. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The cache hierarchy shows different strategies. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core, but the Intel part doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core versus AMD’s 1 MB, and it also has a larger shared L3 at 36 MB versus AMD’s 32 MB. The Intel part’s higher core count (12 vs 8) and larger total cache likely contribute to its wins in math-heavy workloads, while AMD’s Zen 5 architecture appears to deliver higher single-thread efficiency despite fewer cores.

The Intel Core 9 273PE’s inclusion of UHD Graphics 730 means it can output video without a discrete GPU, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F requires a separate graphics card. The AMD part’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, while the Intel part is locked. The Intel part’s support for DDR4 alongside DDR5 gives it platform flexibility, while AMD is restricted to DDR5.

The Verdict

The data suggests the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the stronger choice for applications that prize single-core speed and modern instruction set efficiency. Its 28.5% lead in single-thread and 36.8% lead in extended instructions are decisive, and it also wins in data compression and string sorting. This makes it well suited for general desktop responsiveness, older games, and workloads that are not fully parallelized.

The Intel Core 9 273PE is the better pick for multi-threaded number crunching and physics simulations. Its 32% win in physics and 27.7% win in floating-point math, combined with a 13.4% lead in integer math, show that its 12 cores and 24 threads translate into real performance gains in parallel workloads. Its multithread score is also slightly higher, confirming an edge in heavily threaded tasks.

The choice depends on the workload profile. For users prioritizing single-thread performance and advanced instruction support, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has a clear advantage. For those running multi-threaded compute or simulation-focused applications, the Intel Core 9 273PE’s higher core count and math performance make it the data-driven selection. The 65 W TDP on both parts means power consumption is not a differentiator, and the near-tie in multithread scores indicates that AMD’s efficiency nearly offsets Intel’s core advantage.